>>17981324
>Historically, is a multicultural society better than a homogeneous one?
They have advantages and disadvantages, but generally as a rule of thumb they are often more difficult to govern and have more inequality when there isn't either a strong and impartial centralized authority or dynamic federal system. Probably the best example of a dynamic, federal multiethnic state would be the Persians, who pretty much pioneered the concept of a federated empire and state structure. But then you have more conventional and recent examples like Russian Empire/USSR, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottomans that are the former, which usually balkanize and fall apart violently whenever said authority grows corrupt, weak, or falls due to war or revolution.

>>17981336
>Singapore is living proof that societies function effectively only when they are heterogenous
Singapore is a highly authoritarian city-state ruled by an impartial, centralized authority with a commerce-based economy. That's effective on a city-level, but for a national level you most often end up with cold, relatively incompetent, corrupt authoritarian regimes like post-Soviet Russia or a lot of the Arab dictators (Sisi in Egypt or the Gulf Arabs being good contemproary examples).

>>212257505
What was “benevolent” about America’s actions during WWII that sets it apart from other countries? If you people knew the tiniest bit of history, you would know that this is normal behavior.

Where did all the Iranian posters go? I liked seeing them and hearing what they have to say about us but about two weeks ago they just disappeared all of a sudden. Did their country put harsher bans on 4chan or something?