>>723447852
deriseviley referring to a gay libtard artist who writes a comic that ends with suicide as a tranny is not a stretch of the imagination. following your freudian logic it's obvious that your post stems as an adhoc projection of your homosexual grooming fetish. of course, that's not true. you're just saying "no u" because that first post offended you via a schmittian friend enemy relation to all trannykind in any context because you're a libtard cuck