>>41338796
>On Science
The thing about science is that, is an endevour that is only concerned in descriptions and assigning labels to usual patterns on the experience, but is not concerned with explanations, even less with solutions (Solutions falls in the field of engineering, something that you actually can apply in manifestation as you reverse engineer the mechanism). The current definition of the scientific field nowadays for this site is some herald that have a magic pill certified by some elevated committee or some bizarre arbitrary process accompanied by retarded buzzwords that seems "smart" because you can't make sense of them. So when some easily impressionable person come across this board and find a "scientific explanation" to magic, he opens agape is mouth and start to drill that way, despite not working or being useless, or at least putting 6x the effort on something that should be the most comfortable and easiest thing you could do. Manifestation is the same as plain living, you just select a different experience and intent to it while detaching from the current one. You only do what you love, and you has been doing this since you became aware of existing.
>They just can't harness there is a subjective, not measurable truth out there, as the color of something, that is just some light wavelengths reflected, is for a blind person.
Relevant posts:
https://old.reddit.com/r/Glitch_in_the_Matrix/comments/46x5dv/ct_precognitive_dreams/
https://old.reddit.com/r/Glitch_in_the_Matrix/comments/35f95y/meta_the_realness_of_explanations/
https://old.reddit.com/r/Glitch_in_the_Matrix/comments/2kvdfc/darkroom_vision_chef_hats_dreams/

Everyone who is actually doing the work of practicing this stuff, all the way down, should be able to explain themselves. Not to "proof" (How do you proof things in a subjective reality?) but to explain in a way that add ups to the common sense. That's when you know that it's the real deal: For the worth of their ideas.