>>40876625
those are bad dreams...
ironically some of the worst dreams I've had were lucid dreams. thankfully they typically ended after not-too-long. ofc that usually led to waking up with sleep-paralysis with a different horror-sponsored scene to mentally panic through until regaining the physical ability to make even slight body movements...

um yeah.
overall would recommend though.

If people are worried about 'protecting the kids', would love to see some support in setting up some actual protection that prevents 'harmful targeted media advertisements' at minors(or at least ~12-). Tv commercials shouldn't be throwing in psychopathic horror promotions in between drake&josh and mylittleprincess episodes airing right after school. I get not wanting kids to grow up terrified of the nightly-moon, but if we can't see girls who happen to not be wearing a shirt for a clean, sanitized no-nonsense scene, in the name of -~'protecting muh-le children'~-, restricting psyopped media whose foundation is created with the sole purpose to cause terror and inflict horror-inducing panic by slipping psyopped media to young children in their "safespots", should be considered a relatively small ask.

This may be a hot take, but I'm starting to wonder if a movie depicting a (mild, vanilla, tasteful) embrace between a couple of (idk, let's say ~14-15 year olds) is far less damaging to those involved in the scene, is borderline tedious to the viewers, and -at this moment in society- is spiritually 'healthier' compared to the current horror-ops paradigm.

Not saying we have to completely eradicate the spookyfrens' shows, or even restrict them to the degree that we currently forbid 'tame/innocent/neutral' scenes in media, I just think it's a wild observation that almost seems poetic, but it's mostly an unfortunate and unnecessary circumstance that's done a lot of hidden-harm with delayed damage internally to conceivably continue on manifesting negative effects externally onto others.