>>724189130
Anyone who liked good games already fucked off anon, and you dont get that. There's no audience for a post Bungie Halo game that doesn't play like Halo.
4 was a Reach Call of Duty clone and it died relatively quick after Launch, there were playlists with hundreds of players 6 months in meanwhile 3 and Reach went on to stay highly populated.
5 was entirely new game that barely resembled legacy Halo and it was a commercial failure because the same exact thing that happened to 4 happened to 5.
Infinite was all smoke and mirrors despite them trying to sell everyone on the whole "return to form" but it was just Halo 5/4 gameplay with some legacy sounds/osts thrown in there and it also had a bunch of other problems like no post launch content, missing features, 3 gametypes and all the cosmetics were locked behind paywalls so you couldn't even colour your spartan dark orange.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that they have failed to make their own version of Halo but in spite of that they still do not want to commit to making a proper 1:1 Halo game. Imagine if they grabbed Halo 3, added some QOL improvements, the same game-play, bigger sandbox, updated graphics, more maps, forge, firefight? That would be fucking amazing but they dont want to do that because that entire studio is what the other anon said a "poisoned well" and the only way to fix this shit is to close their studio down and whore out the IP like games workshop does with 40k because atleast they get good games every now and then.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUC24yAP7So

>game developer from Sony respects old halo more than microsoft and 343
lol

>>527303257
Its a mystery