>>96829282
That's a very convoluted reasoning and a gross generalisation done in really bad faith. Using Ai slop pics just speaks that the author doesn't have drawing skills nor the money to hire an artist, making stuff up about how they don't have faith in their written work (like shitty quippy "marvel" dialogue would) is dishonest

I think you are letting your disdain for AI cloud your judgement rather than being objective.

>>96829277
no, its not the same at all, a written document is not like a kitchen/house and usage of AI does not spread like bacteria and roaches. An AI pic is not proof at all that the text has been written using AI, you are being paranoid

>inexcusable for 40k homebrew
I agree with that. I was refering to stuff that doesn't exist, such as a new game made from scratch


It is impossible that both of you cannot be intelligent enough to think of good uses of AI