Hasn't gone far enough. FURTHER AND HARDER

>>512214217
>>512213374

Everyone universally recognizes Congress' authority in the revocation of citizenhip from Confederate leaders. Congress has this power.

But some fat fuck justices in Afroyim v. Rusk (1967), a 5-4 decision, unilaterally waved a magic wand and declared that Congress must first ask pretty please to revoke citizenship from anyone.
I am not joking. That's literally the decision.
>Afroyim v Rusk tl;dr - Congress attempted to revoke Afroyim's citizenship because he voted in an ISRAELI election. That would hurt his feelings so ergo, Congress can never revoke citizenship again.

Just 9 years earlier, in Perez v. Brownell (1958), the Court upheld that Congress could revoke citizenship for acts like voting in foreign elections — because those acts evidenced a breach of national allegiance.

The Court in Afroyim reversed this based not on constitutional text, but on a broad reinterpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Perez lost his citizenship because he voted in a Mexican election, but our entire constitution got "rewritten" by 5 justices because they wouldn't revoke the citizenship of an ISRAELI.

You literally lost your country over 1 Jew. And don't get me started on United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the Supreme Court Case that guaranteed birthright citizenship to literally every single anchor baby today.