>>213782294
Oh, and you entirely ignore actually countering my point about there being functional limits on legitimacy. You are visibly choosing to just throw logical fallacies/inaccuracies at me in order to preserve your previous schema of meaning. It was fun at first, but youve collapsed into reactionary defensiveness. And I'm being character limited. Take care! Try actually reading the traditional Hume->Kant->Hegel line before shouting literally famous inaccuracies about him on a Mongolian basket weaving forum, you clearly would like to take yourself seriously.