>>24546469
>b-but w-we c-compiled the books (and included non-inspired trash because we can't even spiritually discern it's not inspired and isn't the voice of the Good Shepherd because you're in a false religion that attaches works to salvation because you're self-righteous Pharisees)
>therefore idolatry is okay
Cathodox and the various Alexandrian priest cults are literally for NPCs who want some "experts" to trust instead of trusting God.

The notion of trusting God for accurate interpretation is so foreign to you because you're not even saved and not indwelt with the holy Spirit of God and because you want to be ruled over by a man instead of being ruled by God alone. The Bible says God has made me a priest and king, part of the royal priesthood; you bow to pictures and kiss them because you're an idolatrous fool who trusts in man and man's traditions instead of God and His Word. You don't even quote Scripture to make arguments, you just post fedora-tier quips like some furfag atheist or sodomite jew.

Also, Psalms 115:4-8.

>>211916257
>>211916365
And no, the Cathocult didn't write or create or compose or whatever the Bible. If they did, they wouldn't have included books which condemn their cult and they wouldn't have spent centuries burning manuscripts and burning Christians for owning a bible or translating it.

>>22845681
>>22845683
And no, the Cathocult didn't write or create or compose or whatever the Bible. If they did, they wouldn't have included books which condemn their cult and they wouldn't have spent centuries burning manuscripts and burning Christians for owning a bible or translating it.

>>24476377
The Bible was complete long before the Catholic cult was created in the 4th century by an ecumenical council comprised entirely of heretics by a pagan emperor who wanted to use religion for power, which is why Catholicism has always been full of paganism.