>>17970717
>>17970794
1. that commandment is about not making a image or idol and then worshipping it
2. An image of Jesus is an image of the Son of God, not God the Father Himself and using it in a casual way is obviously not the same as worshipping it
3. Jesus was the physical fulfillment/example of the spirit of the law and the old covenant and the new covenant through Jesus' sacrifice and his example overwrite it: Jesus says that the two greatest commandments to be followed above all else that guarantee you are saved if you have faith in Him are
>to serve and love God with your whole heart, mind and soul
>to love others
therefore I don't think you would be damned by casually posting a pic of Jesus

>All of the very few images of the old law were tied very closely to the sacrificial system which was abolished in Christ, and there is no command under the new covenant to create any image. Therefore, all religious images are forbidden.
the fact that you are approaching the new covenant in this legalistic technical way and pronouncing that anons must be damned if they fail to follow some inferred technicality of the law is Pharisee-tier and the opposite of what Jesus meant or intended and would mean the majority of humanity post-first century isn't saved
in fact, it would even mean that literally the very first Christians including the disciples themselves wouldn't be saved considering that they were drawing religious images on the walls of LITERALLY ST PETER THE DISCIPLES HOUSE according to archaeological evidence