>>24795526
>Was he right ?
Not empirically

>Is Liberal Democracy the ultimate Human System
Democracy is what happens when you take cultural aspects out of politics. Liberalism is what happens when cultural elements exalting individuality become core economical and political tenets. Essentially, the notion that individuals have natural rights including property only really makes sense in the context of anglo-saxon exploring the world. Notably, the idea that property rights must be upheld only makes sense when there's enough for everyone, which made sense in a quasi-libertarian expansionnist power like the early USA. The rest is christian prots stuff.

>will we never see something better?
Yeah, probably some form of state-managed capitalism through democracy in the west (aka democratic socialism).

>>24806059
>>24810104
>exporting liberal models is now deemed impossible due to cultural resilience
>capitalism is increasingly being critiqued and is only upheld because "it just works"
>politics become polarized, delving into non-liberal ideologies
>liberal countries stagnate economically while the third world is catching up
>demographies are fucked
>the last man that fukuyama talks about is increasingly becoming reality
lol

>>24810140
>but voting once every few years or even a few times a year obviously isn't the highest possible amount of involvement
A big argument he advances for liberalism is that individual rights also allow for people to express themselves freely. So even if you can't vote, you can still write angry tweets and go protest against immigrants. Meaning you don't have to do the revolution to make things change.

>>24809992
Retard the idea of democracy is that certain things can't be decided individually because they concern us all. The majority has power in this situation only because it has de facto the power to enforce it.

>Democracy legitimizes even something like gang rape
Only if you consent to the democracy in the first place

>anarcho-capitalism
well that explains it...

>>24811029
>Iran is crumbling
get on with your time gramps, now it's afghanistan that represents the religious reaction !

>china's pop
Anon they're 1.5 billion, I think they have a bit of time before they get seriously fucked

>Middle east
Only the oil countries, which are slowling running out of oil too

>Maduro
?

>Russia
Anon they've been engaging in a war with the west through Ukraine and have managed to hold economically, ideologically, militarily and politically. In fact, even if they lost the way, they would probably still come out victorious ideologically.

>MAGA
They absolutely are not what are you even talking about ? Even Drumpf is willing to buy company stocks in order to fully assert his nationalist tendencies

>technocrats will grovel to the ruling party
This hasn't been the case. In fact, it's been quite the opposite

>Literally there is no reason at all to think that liberalism won’t win out in the end.
Refer to the beginning of my post