>>103731494
I don't see any scams, someone ought to pop your bubble before you suffocate from the smell of your own farts.
Every other source says that women have an adam's apple, and even when a layman's definition of adam's apple is limited to a degree of visibility, they still make an exception for a significant amount of biological women who still develop an adam's apple due to hormonal factors.
You could have easily resolved your misunderstanding with the very same Google search you used to create this absurd attempt at a dunk against me for quoting the "wrong" person, most likely because sperging about identity politics is all you're good at.