Hypothesis: westerners (meaning predominantly western whites) have reached the highest level of self-awareness of all the peoples, meaning they have gone the farthest in uncovering their own (individual and collective) mental processes. In their pursuit of higher moral advancement, they have gone the furthest in alienating themselves from the primitive drives an individual and collective may have, thus going farthest in making sure their actions do not harm other humans, the rest of nature and the ecosystem. You may argue that in the west, most people does not care and is selfish, but arguably the degree of neglect in other cultures is much higher, and no other cultures except rich Europeans is obsessed with the preservation of nature and recycling. Point being, most non-western cultures are still relatively more "natural", meaning in they are relatively more true to their original, wild, animalistic instincts, while more westerners are self-reflective on their larger place in nature and as a consequence, alienated from primitive drives under the excuse that this is "higher morals".

Where this is most obvious is territorialism. Territorialism is widely expressed in nature, with all species fighting within-species and across species for land and resources. Among humans, Westerners do not believe that pretending on their borders, or even expanding them is moral. This is excused as primitive and backwards. Such a process entails violence against others, and violence is unacceptable. Non-westerns, for the larger part, are not concerned by this. They believe it is justified to expand their borders at the expense of others, and particularly right now, this is observed in internet currents of non-westerners advocating and pushing for white replacement. Progressive whites are still negligent of this. They (naively) believe that by welcoming foreigners to their society, the foreigners will progress to their level of self-awareness and adopt the same culture of mutual tolerance. It is clear that if the current trend continues, whites will be forced to resort to defend their territories and resources, or they will lose access to these resources, or even their lives. What is still blocking them, is the degree of alienation from the primitive drives imposed on them by psychological advancement.

Thus, what the westerns must do now, is integrate their violent drives into their conscious self-awareness. Instead of dismissing it as primitive, they will need to accept it as part of them, this time not as unconscious primitives (which is how they expressed this violence in the past), but as conscious, modern humans.

Assess if this is likely to happen, and what the consequences of such a process would be?