> no arnsel
> no liverpool
> no barca
instead we got miami auckland and some gay bird

>>149505334 (OP)
CL > WC > CWC

these teams sucked hard enough to NOT win the CL, better luck next time

>>149505334 (OP)
Club World Cup is for Champions League winners (with some additional spots since FIFA blowed up the competition, ranked according to the CL performance in the last 4 years).
>Arslel, Liverpoo
did they win the CL? No? But Chelslel and Man City did, so no ticket for you.
>Barca
close call - Atletico Madrid had the same match points in the ranking and similar exits, but reached the QF an additional time (Barca had an additional group stage exit). 6 points difference for Atleti. Sorry Barca, no ticket for you. Play better in the CL, okay?
>Miami
host spot, could be a fisher's team of Iceland if they ever host it there.
>auckland
best team from Oceania (well--- I hope that FIFA does not allow penguin teams from Antartica, but you never know).
>gay bird
sorry, but Tuntenham didn't play in this tournament.

>>149505367
>CL > WL
kys

>>149505367
WC > CL > Euro > EPL > Europa > Nations League > Gold Cup > CWC

>>149505334 (OP)
why did you mentioned arsenal next to liverpool and barca?

>>149507625
WL is not a thing, retard.
>>149508782
No. WC is full of shitters just like the CWC. CL is the top of the top, therefore, the best football competition.

>>149505334 (OP)
Liverpool was shit before this last year and wouldn’t have any reason to be in arsenal has won fuck all for well over half a decade

pajeets and their obsession with farca and premier league shitters are so annoying
your precious pajeet teams suck hard, that's why they're out, deal with it

>>149510688
>that's why they're out
it's not, it's because uefa put an abritrary rule where leagues in europe can only have 2 teams. there are about 10 PL teams better than juventus who are in it for some reason

>>149510852
how about you fuck off? Champions League is already fucked since 29 out of 36 spots get filled automatically every year.
Let some other teams play.

>>149511121
if we don't care about sporting meritocracy how about you fuck off and let my 3rd division team play in this tournament

>>149511255
Meritocracy was killed when people decided to have the bigger leagues send 9+ teams to all the competitions.

When you monopolize almost all the money in 5 leagues, it turns out they dominate.

>>149511372
the spots are guaranteed to the best performing leagues in the coefficient which are earned through performances, the definition of meritocracy.

>>149505334 (OP)
The criticism should be more that Salzburg and even Porto and Benfica were there

>>149511400
>completely ignores my point
I accept your concession.

>>149511419
your point was addressed and dismissed because you don't seem to know what meritocracy means.

your other point was "we're poor". yeah, no argument there.

>>149511372
Why are people from small leagues so stupid? We don't need the CL to have way more money than you and to dominate your teams.

>>149511453
When you change the rules to favor certain leagues, then it's not meritocracy. You think people that are born rich compete just as hard as you pakis from the ghetto to succeed in life?
>>149511464
You don't need the CWC either, yet you're still begging for more spots.

>>149511419
Yeah turns the likes Young Boys and Dinamo Zagreb didn't do anything when they qualified. The implication is that we need more big league teams, not less.

>>149511488
Who's begging? I'm not poor like a Romanian

>>149511509
They did historically. Teams from Greece, Yugoslavia and Romania got to CL finals in the past, some of them even won it. Do you think that's likely to happen now when one of the big teams is worth more than entire 1st leagues from these countries?
>>149511607
Pimping out underaged girls must be really profitable, Ahmed Khan.

>Teams from Greece, Yugoslavia and Romania got to CL finals in the past
because the european cup wasn't a serious competition and handicapped the best leagues from sending more teams. the reason the richest teams are the richest teams is because they come from the richest countries in europe, they'd still dominate you without outside investment because well, you're romanian. your people choose to live in shop doorways in england over staying there

>>149511696
Yeah they basically never won, we won way more than them and the gap is way bigger than it ever was now because of TV and player movement. Way to not understand modern football though, it's only been like this for the last 3 decades

>>149511834
>handicapped the best leagues from sending more teams
So unless your teams are 1/4 of all the teams in the tournament, that means you're less likely to win it and therefore not meritocratic.
Like I said, I accept your concession.
>>149511878
They did win and got to tons of finals. Even Sweden managed a CL final. Now their best players are all poached and their league is shit.
I know you're satisfied with it cause it worked out in your favor and I don't expect you to ever change your mind, but you should also understand why people want to cap your plastic league as well.

>>149511696
>Do you think that's likely to happen now when one of the big teams is worth more than entire 1st leagues from these countries?

No, but having a path for those teams to get there is important for the health and dream of the sport.

Football is for more than making money for the corrupt fucks at UEFA, FIFA or the owners of the big clubs.

Even in SA - there are teams better than the Argentinian ones that were left behind because of the limit on Brazillian teams, and I'm fine with that. Argentinan fans deserve something to cheer for as well. The continent benefits from everyone getting to enjoy the hype.

Stop crying and play harder to qualify for the next Cup with the slots allotted to your confederation.

>>149511969
I don't follow your argument at all. The sport is more than about making money, so FIFA should prioritize money by allowing more big teams?

>>149511939
>therefore not meritocratic.
you really should just google the word if you don't know what it means. no leagues in europe are given CL spots, they are earned on the field.

>>149508887
>WC is full of shitters just like the CWC. CL is the top of the top, therefore, the best football competition.
Here's your tournament free of shitters, bro.

>>149511939
Lol they won fuck all don't try it

>>149512078
You're in the coping stage right now. I repeat:
>I know you're satisfied with it cause it worked out in your favor and I don't expect you to ever change your mind, but you should also understand why people want to cap your plastic league as well.

>>149512026
what are you saying Eastern Europeans are shitters? nobody tell the Romanian

>>149512100
Yeah they won fuck all

Italy England Germany Spain Portugal and Netherlands won titles, other nations were shit

>muh finals
yeah and we had more of those too

>>149512100
your retarded logic can be used against you. you argue against actually sending all the best teams because smaller leagues need representation but how is it fair on the rest of the austrian teams that salzburg get club world cup money which allows them to dominate further which would also be the case for all the smaller teams

>>149512213
You picked a bad example since Salzburg doesn't dominate the Austrian league at all these past two years at least.

I never asked for equity or anything of the sort and I know it's impossible anyway. I just find it cringe to see British posters complain about how they don't have enough spots at every competition when the rules have already been written to benefit you as much as possible. You want to turn everything into Premier League & Friends.

>>149505334 (OP)
Please stop using CWC I can't take that acronym seriously