Well /sp/? Let's settle this chess related debate.

women are dumber and weaker than men and there's nothing wrong with that
women give birth to men who build nations, that's their job

>>149546626 (OP)
There shouldn't be women's chess and men's chess, it should be open to everyone and the best should win. Chess isn't a physical sport but a mental one.

>>149546891
>Chess isn't a physical sport but a mental one.
How many obese chess champions can you list?

>>149546921
your mom

>>149546626 (OP)
the pool of men playing chess is much bigger than the pool of women playing chess so statistically great chess players are usually men

womenbros...trannies are absolutely DESTROYING us in every competition

how do we cope???

not a sport

>>149546999
Explain cooking.

>>149547042
Right now in 2025 cooking is seen as right wing nazi, no women under 30 are cooking

>>149546626 (OP)
Women and girls are less intelligent than men. Men are just objectively better at chess, look at the world rankings and ELO scores. A troon has a huge advantage here.

>>149546921
magnus carlsen's face looks like it belongs on someone weighing 200kg

>>149546626 (OP)
the whole point of a women's division is flawed anyway
i doubt I would ever see a woman be ranked highest in the open fide rankings

>>149548796
women's divisions exist for the same reason youth divisions are a thing.

>>149546626 (OP)
men are smarter in the extremes, it is know, doesnt mean any professional chess woman would not wipe the average rating, but still trans people should compete in the 'open' category

>>149548808
There’s not really a youth division in high level chess, chess child prodigies regularly beat adults in chess tournaments, Magnus beat Kasparov when he was 13, in 2024 the world champion was a 17 year old Indian.

>>149546626 (OP)
The separation of men and women in chess tournaments already implies this though

it's because men are simply more autistic and prone to be obsessive which helps in chess

>>149546626 (OP)
there's this known phenomenon in chess where women play worse when they know they're playing a man

>>149546626 (OP)
But Queen's gambit inspired a lot of children female players...

>twittercap op
KILL YOURSELF

>>149546891
based pedro

>>149546626 (OP)
Does anyone else find this whole thing hilarious?

>>149546626 (OP)
If there were no differences then we wouldn't have separate leagues in the first place.

>>149546921
>highly intelligent people are rarely obese
woah...

>>149546921
Obesity is associated with increased inflammation, which can impair cognitive function and intellectual reasoning. This trend is evident in e-sports, where top performers are often leaner individuals. The same applies to chess. While chess is not a physical sport, obese individuals may face disadvantages due to physiological and biochemical factors.

>>149546999
This.

>>149549142
Funnies thing is that it was inspired by a male player

>>149546891
It is open to everyone and women face men regularly at lower level tournaments. However they also had to make a separate women's circuit and women's grandmaster title because women are objectively worse at chess than men.

>>149546626 (OP)
I can give you the easy and real explanation. Women's and kid's tournaments are made to improve popularity about the sport in categories with less players. That's why they're there. Trannies are not women so they don't belong there. If you want more female chess players, you don't let men win their tournaments.

>>149546891
>Chess isn't a physical sport but a mental one.
Yes, hence why men have a massive advantage. I feel like this isn't talked about enough.

Did you know that men and women both have an average IQ of 100, hence they are of equal intelligence, on average at least. Then how come when you talk to a woman they are always totally fuckin retarded? Have you ever tried to explain something to a woman? Like, a """smart""" woman who always did well at school and maybe has pretty high qualifications or something? It's crazy, they can only agree and remember stuff, never really understand. So what gives?

Well there are different parts of an IQ test, and men and women score differently on average. So the tests are calibrated so that the average will always be the same for men and women. Women are better at language by a small margin, and men are better at everything else, sometimes by a big margin. IQ tests are weighted so that the language portion is massively disproportionate to the final result, so much so that IQ test results are basically useless for their intended purpose as a general overview of multifaceted intelligence.

To cut a long story short, they have to rig the test to make it seem like women are as smart as men, when actually men outperform women by quite a lot.

As a side note, this is also why Jews score higher than whites and Asians on average, they tend to do better on the language portion.

>>149555194
In an actual, objective is tests, mean score higher than women on average.

>>149546891
>There shouldn't be women's chess and men's chess
men's chess doesn't exist. all tournaments are open to everyone. women have their own special needs tournaments though.

>>149546921
nepo is a fat fuck

>germans

>>149555287
Yes. You will often hear that men have more outliers on both ends than women, and women tend to be closer to the average. Which is true in the rigged test, but when un-rigged you see that the lower outliers are about the same, it's only at the top end that there are more men. I mean you can see it right there on the chart, which I will not ask for a source on because I have already decided it is true and don't need further convincing.

>>149555287
*men

>>149548796
so you do understand why a women's division exists.

>>149555411
Here’s the paper:

https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-handbook-of-the-international-psychology-of-women/sex-gender-and-intelligence/162037156813E98AE48EF68DB5FA184B

>>149546626 (OP)
they are
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_chess_grandmasters
over 2000 chess grandmasters all time less than 50 are female

>>149555462
50 DEI grandmasters

>>149549335
Go back.

>>149549142
How long did they stick with it?

>>149546774
>women are dumber
>There is no statistically significant difference between the average IQ scores of men and women

>>149555510
Lies
ALL LIES

>>149555514
it isn't, you are just brainwashed by delusional /pol/tards spewing utter nonsense 24/7. Ironically enough you were duped by some of the dumbest idiots on the internet that made you proclaim women are dumb.

>>149555510
Yet there are way way less female chess grandmasters. Why is that?

>>149546626 (OP)
Women are less intelligent. That have a smaller brain zones focused on producing intellect
Most of small people have big heads, like literally. foreheads big. They need a caps of bigger than standard size, like I do

>>149546626 (OP)
Those evil fuckers are trying to steal my win.

>>149555552
>smart people
Fixed the typo

>>149555552
Truth

>terminally online losers discuss their perceived superiority on a Yakutian hungry hungry hippo meta discussion blog

>>149555194
>Did you know that men and women both have an average IQ of 100, hence they are of equal intelligence, on average at least. Then how come when you talk to a woman they are always totally fuckin retarded? Have you ever tried to explain something to a woman? Like, a """smart""" woman who always did well at school and maybe has pretty high qualifications or something? It's crazy, they can only agree and remember stuff, never really understand.
Exactly. If you really see women as equals you're in for a lot of frustration and disappointment until you admit to yourself that they are mentally retarded.

>>149555510
There is however a difference in the IQ distribution.
More women are centered around the mean - meaning more of them are midwits.
Compared to women there are more men geniuses and more retarded mem ( Men have a flatter bell curve for IQ distribution)

>>149555551
Because there are less women playing chess than there are men playing chess. So obviously there will be less women GMs to reflect that.

>>149555640
While true, there isn't a significant difference.

>terminally online losers discuss their perceived superiority on a Yakutian hungry hungry hippo meta discussion blog

>>149555661
There is a notable difference especially at the tail ends of the curve.

1. d4

>>149546626 (OP)
women and girls are less intelligent than men

If women are such stupid and simple creatures surely /sp/ doesnt have trouble talking to them or enjoying sexual intercourse on the regular

>>149555411
>which I will not ask for a source on because I have already decided it is true and don't need further convincing.
Kek

>>149546774
>>149555194
Proficiency in chess doesn't primarily track with intelligence. Yeah you can't be a drooling retard and good at chess, but the most important traits for a chess player are dedication and a good memory.

I see no evidence women are lacking in those, therefore they should be made to play with men by their own demand, even if that results in their being uncompetitive.

>>149555640
>More women are centered around the mean - meaning more of them are midwits.
Not true, see >>149555287

>>149555733
I wish you a very happy retrograde ejaculation

>>149555762
The bell curves there literally prove my point

>>149555657
there are far more women who cook yet most best chefs in the world are men. why is that?
there are far more women who sew yet most elite fashion designers are men. why is that?
you can go on and on. you're just coping hard.

>>149555807
Literally patriarchy to be completely honest with you buddy

>>149555799
The top of men’s bell curve is to the right of women’s, men on a weave have a higher IQ than women.

>>149555824
That's not what you quoted, but regardless saying only your IQ test is right needs some proof

Reminder that the highest IQ ever recorded was a womans. When it happened all the Mensa-losers began spiralling and saying that obviously the scales MUST be false! The chick just replied that she always thought IQ was a dumb measure and people shouldnt care as much about it, which sent the mensafags into full damage control mode. In the end the only people caring about IQ are the dorks who have literally nothing else going for them.
>Oh I have a very high IQ
>surely you must be very successful then
>...

Women divisions in chess are supposed to grow the sport among females. Trannies still are males biologically, and the women division is easier - why should a man be allowed to play in an easier division? It doesn’t matter (for now) that there’s a supposed intelligence gap, the performance gap being real is undeniable, and that’s why the women division exists. You should not be allowed to switch divisions based on personal feelings and (hollow) societal approval, not if it endangers the purpose of women divisions, which is protecting biological females and allowing them to perform well in a protected environment. Women‘s gyms also don’t primarily exist for performance reasons, but for the protected environment - and many women don’t want trannies there

>>149555807
I don't know, Anon. I don't really know anything about cooking or the fashion industry, so I can't really tell how people end up at the top in these businesses.

>>149555850
>why should a man be allowed to play in an easier division?
Women can play in men’s(open) divisions. And who do you think funds the women’s divisions? It’s the men’s divisions. If women want more women to get into chess, then why don’t they use their own money to fund their divisions?

And what’s even worse, women’s divisions use the same titles as men’s, only those titles are rated lower. A woman’s international master is rated 2200 elo and above, while the real international master is rated 2400 elo and above. In the real ratings ranking, an international master is higher than a FIDE master, while in actuality, a man who’s rated FIDE master is actually higher rated an a woman’s international master.

Why did women’s chess adopt identical titles as open chess while changing the elo required to attain those titles? Purely because of sponsorship. Companies who don’t know any better will think a woman’s grandmaster is more impressive a title than it actually is, so they give the women’s divisions more sponsorship, on top of the funding the women’s division already gets from the open division.

>>149555917
>If women want more women to get into chess,
It's not specifically women who want this, it's basically all people who care about and organize chess in a competitive environment. So they decided to use some of that funding to organize woman-only tournaments, titles, etc.
Stop trying to turn this into some kind of gender war, it's just a thing that everyone (who cares about the subject) is mostly fine with.

>>149555551
Because women are much less likely to develop incel level autistic fixations over formulaic contrived games due to their ability to have sex regularly

>>149546626 (OP)
>trans girl
No such thing. There's only boys and girls, men and womn, males and females.

Fuck off with that delusional bullshit.

>>149546626 (OP)
>doesn't assume women and girls are less intelligent than men

No "assumption" about it, it's simple fact when it comes to chess.

Since 2000, there have been 1325 people to earn the rating of grandmaster in chess, which is the highest rank available. Only 36 have been women, which is like 2.7% of the grandmaster population.

This is just another example of a shitty, delusional male that can't compete against men, pretending to be a women in order to placate his ego by competing against and defeating inferior women.

Queers and trannies are all human cancer.

>>149546626 (OP)
if she is so bright, why is she asking for the answer?

>>149546626 (OP)
I stand by my rule for all transgender athletes: let them compete as women if they want, but if they win, they clearly have too much testosterone and need to be banned. If you want to be a woman that badly, play like a woman, and that means losing.

incel thread lol

>>149556253
Hope she sees this, simp

>>149555451
>paywall
Nice way to keep anyone from being able to examine it for methodological errors.

>>149546626 (OP)
Why is there a division in the first place? Doesn't having a mens league and a womens already answer the question if men are better?

>>149557255
Because there are very few women playing chess and they wanted to get more women into playing it.

>>149546626 (OP)
What was Bobby Fischer's opinion on women's chess?

How I could redpill my wife on hating trannies?
She's somewhat lefty but her iq isn't low

>>149557768
Redpill her on hating Jews first

>>149557768
put her in an online bubble (rather than having her stay in the real world where you basically never interact with them)

>>149549142
I liked the Fishgirl but all it made me want to do was pills.

>>149557255
there is no men's league.