← Home ← Back to /sp/

Thread 149837634

33 posts 4 images /sp/
Anonymous United Kingdom No.149837634 [Report] >>149837743 >>149837833 >>149838254 >>149838255 >>149838502 >>149840295 >>149841048 >>149841125 >>149841356 >>149841491 >>149843759
>CWC that had billions pumped in by Saudis got less than half the viewership of a random womens game
>the match even included one of the Big Six

The CWC was an awful failure
Anonymous United Kingdom No.149837685 [Report] >>149837730
Only counts channel 4 viewers. DAZN had way more
Anonymous United Kingdom No.149837730 [Report] >>149844424
>>149837685
Wasn't on channel 4
No one watches dazn
Anonymous Australia No.149837743 [Report]
>>149837634 (OP)
women’s game numbers are fake
Anonymous United Kingdom No.149837816 [Report]
It was an England v Wales game so there was obviously going to be more UK viewers than normal. Also 2.9 million isn't a lot.
Anonymous Russian Federation No.149837833 [Report] >>149837918 >>149838244 >>149838400
>>149837634 (OP)
How is statistics collected and how can normal people outside of system trust it?
Anonymous United Kingdom No.149837918 [Report] >>149838047
>>149837833
https://www.barb.co.uk/about-us/how-we-do-what-we-do/
Don't know where the OP pic got the info from but this is the lot where most tv view data comes from.

I always thought a lot of it was estimated based on the channels overall viewing share but I don't actually know and I can't be bothered to read it, but in which case a BBC shown event (the womens game) will be higher than a Channel 5 one (the CWC final).

If you look at the by week data the last week that is published on this website is for the last week of June and the womens game would place 17th on the "most watched" list for that week.
https://www.barb.co.uk/viewing-data/most-viewed-programmes/
Anonymous United Kingdom No.149838047 [Report]
>>149837918
Historically, they used to have people keeping diaries of what they watched (I did one for radio once) and Nielsen boxes which monitor your viewing habits. I don’t know if that’s still how they do it, though, and I’m not going to click your link because I’m lazy.
Anonymous Sweden No.149838090 [Report]
Only brazilians watched that shit
Anonymous Germany No.149838221 [Report]
Our women's game also had millions of viewers. Nobody watched CWC. That doesn't mean people generally care about women's football but it means they don't care about cwc at all.
Anonymous United Kingdom No.149838244 [Report] >>149838328
>>149837833
It's collected by a 3rd party organisation who advertisers use to decide where to advertise and how much to spend, so its fairly reliable
Anonymous United Kingdom No.149838254 [Report] >>149838385 >>149838747
>>149837634 (OP)
Did people on 4chan think the "we don't care" thing was a meme or something? Unironically the club world cup had 0 interest in the UK, nobody talked about it. Even hardcore football fans in my office spent time talking about transfers and shit instead
Anonymous Romania No.149838255 [Report] >>149838287 >>149843395
>>149837634 (OP)
Those women will all fuck you for defending their honor on 4chan
Anonymous United Kingdom No.149838287 [Report]
>>149838255
>reading comprehension

I'm not saying womens football is good, im saying the CWC is so irrelevant it got less than half the viewership.
Anonymous Canada No.149838328 [Report]
>>149838244
>fairly reliable
maybe on planet retard
Anonymous Germany No.149838385 [Report]
>>149838254
Sudacas talked themselves into believing we merely said it as a cope due to our supposedly unearned arrogance being supposedly shattered by the brave performance of South American teams or something.
Anonymous Germany No.149838400 [Report] >>149841469
>>149837833
>facts dont care about your feelings niggas when facts hurt their feelings
Anonymous Romania No.149838502 [Report]
>>149837634 (OP)
Fax I didn't watch it
If I didn't watch it nobody else did
Anonymous United Kingdom No.149838515 [Report]
what even is this comparison?

if it was Chelsea in the womens Champions League final vs real Chelsea in the CWC who do you think would win the ratings?

it's England. and England are basically the best team in the world for women right now.
Anonymous Germany No.149838747 [Report]
>>149838254
yes, non-Europeans unironically thought we only said it as a pre-emptive cope
Anonymous United States No.149840295 [Report]
>>149837634 (OP)
Both are slop tournaments that should have 0 views
Anonymous Austria No.149840770 [Report]
don't care
Anonymous Germany No.149841048 [Report]
>>149837634 (OP)
fact is that CWC games were actually enjoyable to watch
Anonymous United Kingdom No.149841125 [Report]
>>149837634 (OP)
Women's euros is on satellite tv. For fair comparison see: men's euros ratings.
Anonymous Japan No.149841356 [Report] >>149843416
>>149837634 (OP)
>the match even included one of the Big Six
Doesn't Chelsea have no fans?
Anonymous Japan No.149841469 [Report]
>>149838400
Literally nothing wrong with requesting the sources for the facts being brought up.
Anonymous United Kingdom No.149841491 [Report]
>>149837634 (OP)
Haven't watched any, so there
Anonymous United Kingdom No.149843395 [Report]
>>149838255
>women footballs
>fucking men
Anonymous United Kingdom No.149843416 [Report] >>149848861
>>149841356
they have tons of plastic fans all across the south east. Big six is more of a “football success” rather than >how many supporters
Anonymous Brazil No.149843759 [Report]
>>149837634 (OP)
it's crazy how much thirdies care but white people don't lol
Anonymous United States No.149844424 [Report] >>149844721
>>149837730
It was literally free on the app.
Anonymous United Kingdom No.149844721 [Report]
>>149844424
No one's making a dazn account to watch cwc matches
Anonymous Japan No.149848861 [Report]
>>149843416
>Big six is more of a “football success” rather than >how many supporters
I thought it was income (which correlates to success, vaguely), but yeah that's the issue. Some fans have huge income because of their large fandoms (Liverpool, Arsenal, Man Utd, Spurs) while others because of their foreign investments (Chelsea, Man City).