ITT high iq plays, all sports welcome
I'll start with a classic

>>149969085
Imagine being the Groom's friend, thinking you were the best man then you find out about this guy.

>>149967750 (OP)
Still don't know if based or KWAB

>>149973609
based for sure, the 2 just happens to cut off the angle near-perfectly, if pele places it any further to the right it hits him
maybe he could've tried near post but I think the 2 has that covered too if he slides in for it, though not the easiest to tell from this angle

>>149973609

>>149975810
just a bit of banter mate

>>149967750 (OP)

ITS TORRES

>>149975810
Why does this keep on happening in that sport?

>>149977148
why did they do that?

>>149978315
why do you care?

>>149978315
broken string after receiving a smash

>>149969085
based

>>149978279
roid abuse
>>149978687
roid abuse 2.0

>>149978929
>teabagged him too in the process
based

>>149977148

>>149977129

>>149973469
wat

>>149985686
sweet hit
>>149978969
is the right chicken making the left one hatch the right's egg?

>>149976932
>b-b-but... we're just doing time-wasting passes in our side of the field, you're not supposed to heckin challenge the ball!
>ACK

>>149985116
w a t

>>149986700
Is knocking down the posts like that legal? What happened?

>>149987055
it is legal, it's called mankading. It's frowned upon because it's not in 'the spirit of the game'. It's honestly the batman's fault, he shouldn't walk too soon.

>>149978918
>>149978957
lost
>>149983111
that field seems extremely dangerous

>>149987710
wrong board faggot, take that retarded shit to /pol/

>>149987889
I'd be so hyper-focused on 'do not miss DO NOT MISS' that I'd bloot it straight into row ZZ lol

>>149987889
this is considered high IQ in your country?

>>149986824
No, every chicken community naturally evolves to have an old "queen of the coop" that teaches the youngsters,here left chicken was being retarded

>>149976932
Fucking good match that one

>>149978918
kek

>>149987251
KWAB award

>>149985686
how the fuck...?

>>149988372
oh I'm sorry this is more your IQ no doubt

>>149987204
>batman
ain't you some joker

>>149978918
lmao thats legal?

>>149968623
Who got the card?

>>149990137
>how...?
TAS tools

>>149996750
no one, that's why it's high IQ, you can't card two players at once

>>149978918
Lol wtf, this is just like a 10 year old playing Ridge Racer or something. Is there not a penalty for doing this? Jfl...

>>149987784
>How all cyclists act on the road every single day

>>149996951
That looks extremely hard, I mean with hands it's easy but doing it with your nose and shoulders or whatever the equivalent is, lol...

>>149997317
not really, to elephants their noses are literally their hands, retard.

>>149993224
Ura my king..

>>149992612
best kit

>>149997035
Still one of my favourites. Barca looked so deflated then this.

>>149967750 (OP)
That's just low IQ goalkeeping. He's running the wrong way while the ball is already going towards goal.

>>149990808
ToT

>>149996951
hehehhehe he looks very proud at the end with his flapping ears and all

>>149996951
Why did he do it?

>>149975810
The gook couldn't handel the BCC (big Cavendish Cock)

>>150002913
Perfectly balanced,
as all things should be

>>149973609
You are the KWAB

>>149987986
What's the high IQ play here exactly?

>>150006312
Nothing
People are using this thread as a regular webm thread

>>149969085
Kek

>>150006557
LOL

>>150000550
>That's just low IQ goalkeeping.
in a given context IQ is a zero sum game therefore Fabio Aurelio had high IQ

>>149996750
what card?

>>150000550
You don't even know how football is played.

>>150007855
*soccer

>>150006988
funny but also low IQ by the defenders

>>150006493
so apparently this is not legal
what a gay rule

>>150010470
they literally called the goal back, it was disallowed

>>150010498
anon read what I said again

>>149985116
Wasn't the first hit a fair ball? Looked like it hit inside the line?

>>150010524
I thought there might be a chance that because the webm was posted you might have thought that goal counted but in general the move isn't legal

>>149969085
>>149976013
>>149978929 + >>149982903


best in thread

>>149967750 (OP)
Lol Satan is all the sports players. Cmon dude look at their names. Hes named messy, like after a messy pussy. Satan names most of the celebrities after sex because he gaurentees all the visitors to this world are incelibate using magic. He fucking mutilates their faces as children and fasts them into anorexia. He kills their parents so he can raise them using magic. Thats where the word bastard comes from like a sheep baahing. Dude he’s so crazy he literally rapes them every day for 100 years and crushes their cocks between a cinderblock.

>>150010818
must watch

>>150010862
perro garcha

>>150010951
Trying too hard anon, you can't just pretend that you are an unhinged schizo like that it has to come from the heart... or after taking some LSD.

>>150010951
Even your real name is Satanrabhat Devilheet

>>150006312
Nothing. It's the most obvious thing to do there.

>>149996951
this is how civilization starts

>>149975810
no penalty btw

>>150010818
Great webm, saved

>>149976903
Underrated

>>149987055
It's like in baseball if a baserunner is taking too big a lead and gets picked off

>>149978918
Based Hans just fucking with the others

>>150014477
Right but pick-offs are routine in baseball. Turns out (as far as I could tell) that they're very rare in cricket and considered unsportsmanlike lol

>>150010818
beautiful

>>150015764

>>150015764
>filename

>>149987055
The non-striker batter typically takes a few steps forward as the ball is being bowled, which gives them a bit of a head start if they have to run. If they are over the line then the bowler can do what that guy did, and the batter is out. But it is so common that it is considered kind of bad form to try to get the batter out like that.

Typically it is expected that if the bowler sees the batter doing that too much, they will mention it to them rather than try to get them out right away. After warning them then they are fair game. Well sort of, even after warning it is quite contentious to get a batter out like that, because the advantage they get by doing it is insignificant. If they get them out doing that without giving any warning then that usually causes a big fuss, because technically you can do it but it isn't usually done.

It is the stupidest fucking bullshit in all cricket, maybe it is insignificant CHEATING but it is still cheating. Of course you try to WIN the game, I absolute can't stand the 'spirit of the game' faggotry around cricket. If anything a run should not even count if the off-strike batter has crossed the line before the ball is bowled. Is it not contrary to the spirit of the game to try to steal 1/10th of a run every single fucking ball that gets bowled? I am as mad as that batter right now but for the opposite reason.

>>149995344
No you're not allowed to do that, the guy probably got a penalty. Although in that case the penalty was likely worth it to get rid of two of his rivals, so if he did it on purpose it was still pretty high IQ.

>>149985686
dayum....

>>149978918
It's so perfect...the slow approach and precise tap u have to say it's deliberate and then the scoot away along the curve while they both spun out
And it's bonus points because it was all so.harmless and not a big crash

>>150002913
trying to point to the exit "get me out off here"

>>150021508
All of these "it's legal but frowned upon" ebic unspoken rules are pure fucking cancer. You just know faggots will intentionally give you every opportunity to be le bad guy just so they have a good excuse to chimp out

>>150021833
That's all to do with cricket (and other sport from the UK) being taken over by the upper classes back in the 19th century. They were competitive enough prior to that point in time, that people would die while playing (including cricket - noted example is a batsman trying to bat the ball a second time in the same bowl and bashing open someone's brains in the process). The the upper classes brought in the Corinthian ideal of unpaid, amateur sport - we don't need elaborate rules because we're gentlemen doing it for the love of sport. When these sports turned professional they became competitive again, and rules had to be tightened. "Mankading" is still legal however, but like the Kiwi said there's an expectation you'll be polite about it. That's all a holdover from the 19th century.

>>149978315
his racket broke so he took her racket since he is more valuable.

>>149997169
You can, when there's an altercation there can even be cards for the whole team

>>149975810
Shouldn't this be a ban directly? You're endangering another person in a no contact sport

>>150006423
To be honest, I am very impressed at how many clips have been posted that I haven’t seen before.

>>150006570
Ah yes, the tits gambit

>>150022058
That's pretty cool. I'd probably be all over cricket if it wasn't swarmed by indians

>>150016428
>kicks the ball out of bounds
>thinks he can play it again
wtf

Vasco da Gama, the most SOULful club in Brazil
Last week news come out that they were stealing power from the electricity supply in the street for their headquarters, whose official name is "THE DUNGEON"
Before that the big news was that their star player was drinking piss and being sodomized by his girlfriend
Last game they played, one of their vice presidents ambushed an annoying twitter poster after the game to beat him up
I love the Brazilian League

>>150022141
Track cycling can be all over the place. The Korean starting moving up and was over the line, and wasn't looking where he was going.

>>150022201
Holy sovl. Will me buying a jersey be a gay larp or respected and make me an honorary Brazilian? I have traded nudes with over 20 brazilian women at this point if that matters

>>150022277
>traded nudes with over 20 brazilian women
I got 40+ step up son

>>150022234
kek WTF

>>150022277
it's a fine choice for a jersey. Vasco is very popular team with a nice history, but they're ultra shit currently so it's not the kind of team that'll make you look like a plastic fans

>>150000550
Overrated post

>>149987251
I honestly don't understand how Pepe lives with himself

>>150021833
Broadly the idea is that the act gains only a very small advantage, whereas taking someone's wicket is like a really big thing to happen in a cricket game. The punishment doesn't fit the crime, so to speak. Also it would hold up the game a lot if it started to become a common thing, especially if they weren't always succeeding. Like let's say you have a close match, it might be worthwhile for the bowler to do that every few balls, just in case. If this started to happen they would likely have to make some new rules, some repercussions for doing it but failing, something like that. It's a lot of shit that no one really wants to deal with, so there is a sort of a gentleman's agreement that you ignore it unless it becomes particularly egregious.

I still think it's fucking dumb and gay though, this is professional sport. How about a gentleman's agreement to not cheat. Just stay behind the line and you can't get out, it's really really simple. Most cricket fans agree with this and don't have sympathy when it happens, but there's always a few spirit of the game spergs out there.

>>149997565
well obviously not literally, brainlet

>>150022192
?
it was pretty obvious what he was trying to do, don't know if he got away with it though

>>150023212
he just got a yellow card

>>150023212
>it was pretty obvious what he was trying to do
which is what exactly

>>150023357
delay the game and prevent the attacking team from putting the ball back into play before he was back in front of his net
within the context of this thread, "high iq" really just means gamesmanship

>>150023365
Oh damn. The other anon said he only got a yellow, so I guess it did work afterall.

>>150023357
The attacking player wanted to take the throw-in as quickly as possible, before the opposing defenders could get back in position. But when the goalie threw the other ball back onto the pitch, that bought his team some time because someone would have to go and get the ball, because you can’t have two balls in play at once.

>>150023395
>you can’t have two balls in play at once.
Yes you can. It's the ref who decides whether or not to stop the game when a foreign object is present.
If he snatches the unfair ball quickly (or sees that it's going into an irrelevant part of the pitch) he can let the game continue no problem

Behold: the 5000 IQ play that solved football

>>149975810
>>150022251
How does anybody even take this "sport" seriously?

>>149977148
if i was pickleball i would killmyself

>>150025028
lmao

>>150001452
this

>>150022225
now, i'm very stupid, but i thought one of the rules of the game was that the ball had to bounce after being bowled, before it was in play

>>150021542
>cheating is high iq
I'm so tired of this meme

>>149969085
Kek. I don't get why EVERYONE at events like this takes a photo. Everyone else is already taking photos

>>150025028
Give me one reason why they don't do this in professional football

>>149987784
Cry harder brown kikesucking nigger

>>149987675
How is being faster high iq?

>>149968623
Captain Tsubasa defending

>>150021682
Agreed - it was downright genteel.

>>150025028
I kneel

>>150029728
That's not high IQ - that's just great

>>150029550
anon who posted it is lower iq so everything else, what's happening in the video included, is high iq in comparison

>*Naruto-rides to victory in you're way*
Heh.... nothing personnel, kid....

>>150010470
Only goals propelled into the net by a stick count.

>>150030252
I don't have it but this with the MoS music and voice-over is kino

>>150030518
>leaf doesn't even know the rules of his country's national sport
Goal counts as long as you don't knock it in intentionally with your body. If it's accidental, or you can play it off well enough that it appears to be accidental, good goal.

>>150030570
I said propelled. If the puck hits you and goes in, that's good but you can't add momentum

>>149989308
What sport even is this?

>>150030252
Is this the meta and I just didn't know, or did he just solve cycling?

>>150022234
KKKKKKKKKK

>>149967750 (OP)
>high iq
A direct shot on goal is not high-IQ. This is just massive tunnel vision by the goalkeeper + defense, paying more attention to the potential receivers than to where the ball is.

>>149969085

>>149975810

>>150031536
It's huge game awareness, like zlatan with the Sweden bicycle kick

>>150031622
I can't watch ice sports like this I'm always afraid someone will get slices to death

>>150031634
>It's huge game awareness
It's literally one of two options in that situation. All he had to be aware of was that the keeper left an opening while weighing those two options.

>>150031649
what about snow sports?

>>150022254
FINALLY the world starts listening to our suggestions about multiball.

>>150029728
This is my favorite webm of all time.

>>150031724
Perfidious Albion

>>150031688
They're fine snow is fluffy and soft and comfy

>>150031686
Not true because everyone was expecting the long ball In to his teammates
He stepped out of the programming and saw the reality of the situation and no one else did

>>149987251

>>149968623

>>150031794
>everyone was expecting
No one cares what "everyone" expects when you're the one who gets to decide.
Lots of free kicks in that position are on-goal.

>>150031885
>women

>>150031991
holy shit i just realized that i posted the wrong file

>>150031633
this isn't as funny without the commentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJ6n1F_Qk6c

>>150015764
>>150015794
okay, this is taking the skipping leg day thing too far

>>150022277
w-where do you find said women

>>150031767
Crashing in style.

>>150027174
That is a legal delivery. The ball doesn't have to hit the pitch before the batter receives the ball, although that is the most common form of delivery you would see in cricket.

These deliveries are known as full tosses, generally aimed between knee and waist height. They're not usually the most controlled deliveries as you see from the webm, and often result in runs being scored. They are often the result of a bowler making an error in his placement, but are sometimes intentional as well.

A delivery above waist height that does not hit the pitch before reaching the batsman is called a beamer and IS illegal. The bowler will be warned and a 'no ball' called, requiring it to be delivered again and a run being credited to the batting team.

A slight variation is a delivery called a yorker that looks like a full toss but pitches right at the batters toes. A hard ball to deliver accurately, and often the delivery most bowlers will be aiming for when they accidentally bowl a full toss as seen in the webm.

>>150031973
>Lots of free kicks in that position are on-goal.
then post your top10 goals similar to that

>>150033049
>similar to that
Are you fucking retarded or something? A direct free-kick does not equate to a whole defense fucking up like this.

If you just want examples for direct free-kick goals in general, there's countless of those. Here's literally the first video that came up in a google search:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXZNtZMsNq0
Just 50 from within the last year, but more than enough to illustrate the point. Select your own favourites.

>>149978279
It doesn't keep happening you idiot, the video is just on a loop.

>>150033136

>>150027174
It's not legal to hit the ball twice off one delivery in cricket rules so I wonder what happened after the clip finishes. The boundary should not count, I don't know if the batsman gets punished beyond that though.

>>150033096
>A direct free-kick does not equate to a whole defense fucking up like this.
Then he was indeed high iq

>>150025028
Why is he wearing a different kit from everyone else?

>>149976903
lol based
fuck the rules if someone disses you

>>150031706
This is incredible, but I’m pretty sure he just got lucky for the second half.

>>150033136
Fucking lmao

I predict this is going to become a meme response that we see hundreds of times from now on.

>>150033136
heh

>>150032029
>teammates do nothing
was this premeditated?

>>150032643
Interpals of course

>>150033290
>other people around me being stupid means I'm smart
Great logic, Dracula.

>>150035412
Those all look like they work in PR.

>>150033441
Because he's the keeper

>>150036397
That's how it works, yes
For example in this conversation my iq is 195

>>150029728
good god they broadcast this school game

>>150030252
wait... why don't they all do it?

>>150031122
>>150037073
banned in any serious competition

>>150030252
for me it's the guy on the scooter who does a double take, then immediately says fuck ya I'm going to try this out

>>150037040
>That's how it works, yes
Ignorance is bliss. In your case, ignorance also is high-IQ.

>>150033278
It did count as it wasn't intentional

and England won

>>150031633
>Dork

>>150006557
Fucking kek
Also Long Island mentioned

>>150022234

>>150037040
Kek
LETS GO ROMANIA RALLY

>>149967750 (OP)
It was extremely weird positioning by the d idk I guess you might have been st00pid to not do it but then again you still had to do it. It's like giving Ritalin to a maths major
They say this in the Englands maths