Removal edition

>To make cards, download MSE for free from here:
http://magicseteditor.boards.net/
>OR
>Mobile users might have an easier time signing up here:
https://mtg.design/
https://mtgcardsmith.com/

>Stitch cards together with
http://old.photojoiner.net/

>Hi-Res MSE Templates
https://pastebin.com/2AFqrY68

>Mechanics doc (For the making of color pie appropriate cards)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgaKCOzyqM48dFdKRXpxTDRJelRGWVZabFhUU0RMcEE

>Color Pie mechanics
https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/making-magic/mechanical-color-pie-2021-10-18

>Read this before you post cards for the first time, or as a refresher for returning cardmakers
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jn1J1Mj-EvxMxca8aSRBDj766rSN8oSQgLMOXs10BUM

>Design articles by Wizards
http://pastebin.com/Ly8pw7BR

>Primer: NWO and Redflagging
http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/community-forums/creativity/custom-card-creation/578926-primer-nwo-redflagging

>Q: Can there be a sixth color?
A: http://pastebin.com/kNAgwj7i

>Q: What's the difference between multicolor and hybrid?
A: http://pastebin.com/yBnGki1C

>Q: What is precedence?
A: http://pastebin.com/pGxMLwc7

>Q: How can I proxy my cards for testing?
A: <https://pastebin.com/9Xj1xLdM //> https://mtgprint.cardtrader.com

>Art sources
http://www.artstation.com/
https://www.deviantart.com/
https://cgsociety.org/
http://fantasygallery.net/
http://grognard.booru.org/
https://stablediffusionweb.com/#demo
https://deepai.org/

>/ccg/ sets
http://pastebin.com/hsVAbnMj
(/ccg/ collab set in development)

Previous >>95570681

Thread challenge: Design a removal spell that costs 4 or more mana.

>>95742019 (OP)
>Thread challenge: Design a removal spell that costs 4 or more mana.
This is probably garbage, but it's a start.

>>95744797
Why four mana?

keeping it simple this time

>>95742019 (OP)
>Thread challenge: Design a removal spell that costs 4 or more mana.
Too hard to cast probably.

>>95742019 (OP)
>Thread challenge: Design a removal spell that costs 4 or more mana.
Done.

>>95742019 (OP) (OP)
>Thread challenge: Design a removal spell that costs 4 or more mana.
Pic related, though that was already designed

Hopefully before end of thread I will have a new set to channel the challenge into

>>95747076
You probably want to change the ability to:
>Other Toy creatures (you control) have toxic 1

Otherwise you effectively have a toxic 3 drop 2

>>95748818
That might be too much value for a single card - it's a 2x1 at worst, 4x1 at best

See Assassin's Strike for reference - same cost, sorcery speed, no rebound.

>>95746048
because the thread challenge was four mana

though honestly I can see it being both more and less depending on the kind of deck it's going into,

>>95742019 (OP)
>Thread challenge: Design a removal spell that costs 4 or more mana.
i thought of the name before anything else on the card

>>95752187
Damnation
Day of Judgement

I have no idea if this is a thing already or not, but I thought it was cool.

Working on ideas for new sets.

>>95757645
neat ideas

>>95757645
nice montage

>>95766199
I think this 1930 Noir-Great Depression set could work and it would be a good challenge. Which border looks better for a more contemporary set? Innistrad Double Feature or Japanese Mystical Archive?

>>95742019 (OP)
>Thread challenge: Design a removal spell that costs 4 or more mana.
Designed this to be a finisher, but it technically counts as removal too.

>>95753640
How long are you intending for the exiled cards to be able to be cast? Way it's written now, you'd have to do it right after casting that. If that's the intention, it's terrible, especially since you have to pay for them too, even if it's any mana. Should probably make it at least until the end of your next turn.

Also, minor thing, but it should say library, not deck. Otherwise, neat idea.

>>95770387
Well-connected Agent is a bit hard to grok on first read, and Travelling Con Man shouldn't be blue, but overall these all seem pretty well designed, and it's a sweet set idea.

In terms of border, I'd go with Innistrad, but that's just because I feel like the Japanese Archive design looks better only for special releases of cards, not for a full set. Go with what you like best though.

Question for an idea I had related to Mutate:

How SHOULD I word something like this: “Target creature gains a Brightness counter. (Creatures with a Brightness counter aren’t Human/ lose the human creature type and cannot gain the human creature type/etc)” ?

>>95772134
I was actually thinking 'one per turn until you run out of spells', but ended up cutting that out.

Otherwise, they're meant to stay indefinitely.

>>95772596
nice

This needs to exist now that blood moon is in

>>95772994
What's the proper phrasing for them sticking around forever anyways?

>>95772340
I think (Creatures with Brightness counters on them lose the Human creature type and can't have or gain the Human creature type.) works just fine.

>>95772596
>>95776837
For that, you want "Each player looks at the top three cards of their library, then puts one on top of their library and exiles the rest. You may cast those spells for as long as they remain exiled, and you may spend mana as though it were mana of any colour to cast them."

In that case, it's probably a bit much for its current cost, especially in multiplayer formats. I'd change it to 2UU at minimum.

>Handmaiden
Absolutely love the idea, but I don't know if it could be mono-White as is, and certainly should be rare regardless.

>>95774661
Very slightly bothered by the second ability not costing 7 to match Urza's Factory, but I get it's meant to be usable off three other Forges. 10/10 otherwise.

i want cards that enable bluffing, gambits, and overall messing mentally with your opponent

>>95778549
Thanks.

I'm thinking I should actually swap handmaidens effect to 'casts a spell that isn't theirs', since it's meant as a counter to Tantalizing Glimpse but kind of doesn't.

>>95778614
Mind games are always fun...

>>95772134
Innistrad Double Feature looks really good on this . One thing I hadn't considered before is that I don't trust makeplayingcards to cut borderless cards correctly, so I am going to stick with double feature. It's a shame that these borders aren't complete in cardconjurer.
I am just spitballing cards at this stage, just having fun.

dunno, cards

>>95786195
>Kitana as mono black
Surprising, with her wind theme I'd have pinned her as having some white and/or blue.

Shao needs some serious rephrasing but the concept of a card that punishes you so severely for not losing life is interesting. I get the sense that these are meant to reflect an older era's creature power level, but even then with such a steep drawback I think you could get away with costing Shao very aggressively, like 2 CMC or even less. After all he has no built in way to cause you to lose life, which makes you very vulnerable if any piece of your engine is disrupted.

I do like the flavor of Shao very easily causing you to lose the game though. To my mind it's the consequence of failing him.

>>95786222
Yeah this is MK2 era Kitana, so she's still under Kahn's control and brainwashing.
I initially had Kahn at 4BBB instead, but felt like that made him too easy to get out with a Dark Ritual. Perhaps 3BBBB?

And yeah, I was out for a while, I'm still catching up with modern ideas of power creep and power level.

Kitana with regenerate is a deliberate flavor choice tho. I kind of want to make the cards feel a bit like mid-90s Magic.

>>95786195
Finally a reason to use Greed!

Saw a meme, decided to make a card out of it.

>>95747076
>made a toy Commander
>in a color identity with exactly 2 toys

Don't feel like going through the hassle of generating a card and looking for art and stuff, but what do you think of:

>Persistent Disobedience
>BB
>Enchantment - Aura
>Enchant target creature.
>At the beginning of it's controller's upkeep, enchanted creature phases out until the next end step.

Like a slightly nerfed Oubliette.
I think it could create some really interesting situations. It's not quite removal, the player still has it for blocking and instant speed abilities or triggers, but they're not getting the full value out of it.
Because an aura phases out with a creature, sorcery speed enchantment removal on the player's own turn won't help them.
It doesn't blink so no way to abuse ETBs
And I think in niche cases someone might even play it on their own creature if it has symmetrical effects, or good stats with a big downside that they can avoid with this

>>95793451
Flavor-wise, I think it is too wishy-washy for black, it seems like something white would do; but I like the general idea: see picket line.

>>95793387
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Just out of curiosity, would anybody be willing to sort the greek gods by mtg color?

>>95797869
Zeus: Red, White, & Black.
Hera: Green & White
Poseidon: Blue & Red
Demeter: Green, White and Red
Apollo: Green & Red
Artemis: Green
Ares: Red, White & Black
Athena: Blue, Red & White
Hephaestus: Blue & Red
Aphrodite: Red & Green
Hermes: Blue & Black
Hestia: Red, Green, & White.
Dionysus: Black and Red
Hades: White, Black & Green

>>95799583
Hmm. A bit too much multicolor for my tastes, but that just means I can pick and choose within those limits.

Thank you.

>>95794308
I did think about white, but because the closest existing card was black I stuck with that. I can see it being compared to any of the dozens of white cards that suppress abilities and attacks/blocks though

I like Picket Line but I do wonder if 0/6 is too big for 3CMC and a decent effect. I assume you're going for the idea that because it's a wall made of multiple people it should be bigger, but I think 0/4 would still be reasonable. White has a couple fogs to prevent battle damage if you're really worried that it having to block will get it run over
I can also imagine a world where the card is bant (mostly so we dip into blue, but green unity too, and avoid black sac engines) and maybe has a steal effect like:
>At the beginning of their upkeep, each opponent chooses a creature they control. While you control Picket Line, you control target creature, it cannot attack or block, and its activated abilities can't be activated.
>Picket Line gets +0/+1 for each creature you control but do not own.

There's definitely so much design space for phasing out as removal though. I have Oubliette in a hatebears deck in Commander and people just aren't prepared for it.

Kitana improved.
Shao Kahn improved and made clearer.
Mileena added.

>>95801277
aaaand I just saw that "destroy target nonland permanent your opponent controls" should be either

>target nonland permanent you don't control
or
>target nonland permanent under another player's control

another Touhou card
being a Dōsojin (guardian statues often represented as married couples), Nareko had to have the soulbond ability

>>95794308
>>95800863
In fact I actually liked the bant idea so much I decided to design it

The topic of green removal comes up a lot these days, given that the color is effectively dead because it can't interact with anything and REALLY can't interact with uber-FIRE trash like Screaming Nemesis.

I've been fiddling with the concept for a while. Banisher-Priest like abilities with the flavor of eating things, etc. But I'm settling on pic related.

Green can already kill things with Flying. Stretching that out (a lot) you could find a world where Green can destroy things conditionally on whether they have abilities at all. Maybe it's pushing the color too far, but I feel that the savage wisdom of simplicity being able to dodge green's removal makes a lot of sense.

>>95805900
I would say that card is too cheap for what it does.
This was my attempt, having the barest amount of green alternate costs as a way to push players to include more green in their decks.

>>95806276
>I would say that card is too cheap for what it does.
Every other color has largely unconditional, or at least barely conditional, 1cmc removal and basically universal 2cmc removal.

There's no reason real reason green specifically should be totally gimped in its ability to interact. 2cmc is THE standard for the price of interaction.

>>95806285
Green can make mana of of any color the easiest of all the colors, so it has access to all that other removal with ease.

>>95806383
That's not how it works.

>>95806398
it really is when it comes down to it

>>95806470
Red getting treasure tokens does not mean Fatal Push is within red's color identity.

Also, in my endless search to find the right lands that will help slow down this particular format (As much as I hate named tokens) I've eventually leaned into this design.

It's only a very small drawback in theory, but I think the potential self-sabotage of giving an artifact to an opponent playing an artifact deck is also significant.

>>95805900
Green is supposed to have worse interaction to compensate for having better creatures and ramp.
I think you could do something with expanding greens ability to destroy specific types of creatures, but this is so broad it's on the level of black cards like go for the throat, possibly better depending on the environment.

not sure if this is the correct wording

>>95809035
>Green is supposed to have worse interaction to compensate for having better creatures and ramp.
>I think you could do something with expanding greens ability to destroy specific types of creatures, but this is so broad it's on the level of black cards like go for the throat, possibly better depending on the environment.
Yeah I feel that. I'm considering "Target creature with flying or haste." or something similar.

>>95812687
Needs "Enchant creature" text.

"Enchanted creature gains..." not "has..."

And typically this is worded "Whenever a player casts a spell or activates an ability..." unless you specifically want to include copied spells for some weird reason that will completely break the game. But also, Flagbearer is a white effect and worded differently.

cards

Just had an idea to make this. Everything besides the effect is still tentative. But I wonder how will the effect work if both players have this card on the battlefield. Will it loop?

New card. Whaddaya think?

Too good maybe. 3/2?
Made it because Wizards are cowards when it comes to FFXI

Gold mana - "mana of any color" (specifically)
Interaction - whole new thing
Denied - also a whole new thing

>>95814961
That's retarded.

>>95814116
>CMC 3/3 with ward 3 indestructible and haste
Are you on crack? Even ignoring the attack trigger, that's incredibly busted.

>but you have to control a nontoken artifact!
Well thank god there are no 0, 1, or 2 CMC artifact cards that see regular play in eternal formats.

>>95813847
The art reminds me of Cardcaptors and that makes me happy :)

But in all seriousness, fairly believable card. If they printed something like it I really wouldn't be surprised. There is one big problem though.
I get that you're basically trying to make all combat benefit you, but I think for balance reasons it should still only be your own creatures that gain lifelink. There's too many shenanigans you could do with goad or forcing blockers that would very quickly make your life higher than wizards has previously printed cards to do.

Also I think you should be less worried about what happens if there are two of these on the field and more worried about what happens if your opponent swings at your face. I think because it's a hard replace effect (i.e. instead) some bullshit happens with the way the effect interacts and you may just be immortal.
Not certain, but me and my friends ran into a similar question in a redacted cube. Something about it being a state based action instead of a trigger??? I have no fucking idea.

>>95815543
My first thought when making the card is "I want to make something that give other creatures keyword as a cycle," and started with White. Then I want to make the opponent's creatures one to be less beneficial or riskier to use. I'll post the others later when I get back to work.

I actually didn't think of how the effects make you immortal lol. But I realized that the card is a kill-on-sight card so I tried to make it has less stats and hard to cast.

Maybe I should just make it only buffs the other White (or other color) creatures, or separate the replacement effect to another card.

>>95816325
How about instead of you stealing lifelink you just have
>if you would gain life, gain twice that much life instead.
It’s obviously not as powerful, but you’re still getting the bigger advantage
Or just
>Id an opponent would gain life they lose that much life instead.
That might actually be good because it’ll end a game quicker

>>95813847
>>95816659
Ah right. I think I should try to avoid effects that prolongs the game.
Here are the others but I'll tweak later on.

>>95821208
I would redo pretty much all of them to be honest.
I think you're very close to being in the design space Wizards would actually print, but I think they all need tweaking in ways that change what you intended.

>red
I think this is closest to printable.
It should probably just be reworded to:
>Whenever a creature attacks you, if that creature entered this turn...
You don't need "opponent controls" or "if you're the defending player" if "you" is in there. It's not possible for creatures you control to attack you.
I also think Spirit of Volderox should probably be the thing to deal the damage. Mechanically, creatures can do damage to their own controllers (see Rakdos Charm) but there's a big advantage to you controlling the source of the damage: you can multiply the damage with any number of pre-existing red cards, and get triggers from you dealing the damage.

>blue
I don't think defender is the best keyword for blue.
Archetype of Imagination is a very similar blue card that gives all your creatures flying and prevents creatures your opponents control from having flying.
If you want to stick to altering creatures on the field, I would maybe go with giving flying and an effect that says creatures your opponents control cannot block creatures you control with flying. It's flavorful in the sense that as the blue player, your creatures know how to use this magical flight they've been gifted but your opponents are clumsy and uncoordinated. It will also close out a game, making all your shit unblockable.
Otherwise, flash is extremely blue. Maybe give all cards in hand flash, but opponents casting spells on your turn draws you cards?

Part 1 of 2

>>95821208
>>95824885
Part 2 of 2

>black
I think this is fine except for the 2nd effect being so incredibly white. If it was orzhov I'd say it's perfect, perhaps even a little overcosted at 7, honestly. On a creature, I feel like an effect like the one you have could be 5 or 6 without it being broken, especially as a 5/1. Any ping of damage would take it out.
I think to make it more black you could stick Dictate of Erebos on there.
>Whenever a creature you control dies, each opponent sacrifices a creature.
Remember, in black you don't really care about your stuff dying, usually it's good for you. Black players are going to have so many triggers from things dying or from how many creatures they have in grave. I don't think protection is the right effect for black.
And again, for closing out games, this will end em real quick. Damned if they block, damned if they don't- exactly what black wants.

>green
Funnily enough I think this is a more black effect than the one you had on black. I also don't think it fits with the trample effect very well.
Personally, I think the simplest solution here is just to make it an Overrun effect. Either give all your creatures something like +5/+5, or +X/+X where X is the number of creatures you control.
That's more or less Craterhoof Behemoth's effect, and so I would understand if you think that's a little boring.
Green leans into token generation a lot, so maybe you could go with
>Whenever a creature you control does combat damage to another player, create X 3/3 beast creature tokens where X is equal to the damage dealt
It's a slightly slower effect, but it would stop you getting punished by an attack in response as you'd have a bunch of blockers to stack and prevent trample damage hitting you.

Lucha set?

>>95806586
Treasure tokens being one-and-done means it is far far more difficult for Red to have access to other colors' shit with them. Meanwhile drop one Birds of Paradise and you can consistently cast Lightning Bolt, Brainstorm, Fatal Push, whatever the fuck you want until it gets removed.

How is it?

>>95827541
Technically doesn't work since "pay up to 5" means they can pay 0 and regenerate it.
Wording aside, a creature like this wouldn't really create fun play patterns (see: Child of Alara) even if it's thematic.

>>95824885
>>95824892
Thank you for your input. I'll try to explain my thought process.

>Red
Like I said before, I want to make opponents' creatures to be a riskier to use, that's why I want to make the other creatures that deals damage since higher power equals higher risk (but I guess I can use X as attacking creature's power instead, but make Spirit of Volderox as the dealer). And in Commander, this will make opponents creatures to avoid the controlling player and hit each other instead.

>Blue
That's definitely better. I just want to make use of Defender more lol. Otherwise, your flying effect is pretty much similar to what I thought before, something like "Super Flying" for own creatures.

>Black
Yeah the other effect feels a bit forced and quite difficult to think of. Dying trigger is definitely better.

>Green
My reference is pic related, but kinda reversed. But this is also the hardest for me to think of. I thought about some land synergies before, maybe I'll try to aim that.

The first thought is basically giving all other creatures keywords, but then I want to give some negative effects to the opponents'. Some of your suggestions are positive effects to the controlling player so your "keyword" is better, but I think I still want to come up with negative effects version (this might also limit my thought process so I didn't think of other ideas...)

>>95828943
There is an interesting design space if you wanted to play with defender.
More recently Wizards has printed keyword counters effects. Like Vraska Joins up in OTJ puts a deathtouch counter on every creature you control, Gift of the Viper puts a deathtouch and reach counter on target creature.

I think it would be really interesting to have a cycle of cards that put a keyword counter on everything.
The neat thing about it is it doesn't require anything to be active on the field for it to persist, and new creatures coming down won't be affected.

The reason I think of this is because you say you wanted to play with defender. I think putting defender on your opponents stuff is a very white effect rather than blue. I'm thinking of Dog Umbra, Guard Duty etc. And everything on the field having defender is going to slow a game right down.
But dishing out defender counters instead would be a way for you to distribute the effect to the whole board without locking the game down too long.

>>95833157
Yeah, printable. Not really much to say. I don't know why you want to play cloak, but this is fine.

>>95834542
I like facedown shenenigans mostly, and "cloak a card" sounds really snazzy

what is the current card with the most keywords on it?

Challenge: Make a custom card that couldn't be printed in the real game not due to power level, but due to rules weirdness

>>95842523
>>95826271 made me think of this. how would this possibly be worded?

>>95840200
The eldrazi from foundations?

>>95844041
Unfortunately artifacts are insanely busted and a 0 do-nothing is still essentially a free Cloud Key for artifact decks

>>95848574
bro? your darksteel relic?

>Spent about a month trying to get vehicles to work with Myriad for a Twisted Metal themed deck
>Its impossible to get Myraid to work with vehicles.
The problem is, tokens enter as a vehicle from Myriad, so even if they are turned into creatures through an enchantment or something, they will not enter attacking because the effect is applied after the token enters.

Few questions before I present it to my Pod.
>Will the first line this cause tokens made with Myraid to enter attacking?
>Is it worded appropriately?
>Does it seem balanced?
>Any other recommendations for a Twisted metal themed deck?
The last line is pure flavor, so I wouldn't be heartbroken axing it.

>>95848840
It should work as intended.
>Does it seem balanced?
Looks extremely weak to me. To do *anything*, you need at least:
>Calypso (that isn't summoning sick)
>One untapped pilot
>Another pilot to sacrifice
>A third creature to crew your vehicle
>And a Vehicle
And even then, you're choosing not to attack with four creatures for the benefit of getting to attack with three.
You obviously want to build up a larger board than that and try to kill all your opponents in one go, but the setup seems astronomical. Doing OTKs is also a pretty repetitive gameplan for a commander.

The last ability seems like it'd be a lot of fun. A player dying usually implies that someone is going off in some way, so it's nice that it gives the other players a way to find an answer. It's not really a great fit for a commander that's based on killing all your enemies at the same time though.

I'm thinking about making something really annoying

>Whenever a player chooses a target, they flip a coin. if the result is heads, the target is no longer considered valid.

>>95849884
There's an instant that does that. Your version should probably either counter the spell, or allow you to take control of it and choose new targets. Otherwise it just becomes a game of them naming a valid target, losing the toss, and having to repeat the process over and over again. That could easily happen 4 or more times without needing to be ridiculously unlucky.
I might also suggest that it gains counters each time it blocks a target, and sacs itself when it has enough counters.

>>95849520
My plan was to add equipment & cheat equip cost to make a voltron equp that swings at the weakest player while slinging 3/4 copies of an ETB vehicle at everyone else for things like draw or burn damage. The vehicles keep Myriad, so unless someone has artifact removal, could probably swing it out each turn. It feels fragile though.

Origionally, I wanted to 'Equip rockets and missiles' to the vehicles to keep on theme and made me think about how I could make Vehicle Equipment viable. I seen Cyberman Squadron and it took me down a rabbit hole to making this card.

>>95850620
>You flip X coins where X is the number of Y counters on *creature*, if any are heads, sacrifice this creature.
Hold on, going full retard

>>95851185
No I meant:
>Whenever a player casts a spell that targets one or more permanents, flip a coin. If heads, gain control of the spell, you may choose new targets for the spell.
>Each time you gain control of a spell with this effect put a [insert set-relevant name here] counter on [this card]. When [this card] has 3 or more [set-relevant name] counters on it, sacrifice it.

if you were to add the reminder text of one of the Devour abilities, which one would it be? Or would you prefer not to have ANY reminder text at all?

>>95854308
I'd have the full text on the first one and then a shorter colloquial one that explains the difference on the second. Something like "you may sacrifice spirits for three counters each"

Coffee is equipment.

>>95873239

>>95873239
>>95873245
Card Notes/Additional Rulings:
1. [A creature that 'can't die' cannot be sacrificed as a cost.]
2. [Destined creatures are permanently legendary unless they change zones]
3. [If you complete the Dark Tower dungeon and haven't cast the exiled card from 'The Unfound Door' room you will still be able to cast it if you can manage to re-enter The Dark Tower later on.]

>>95850620
Doesn't casting a spell at an unvalid target fizzle the spell?

>>95873245
The alternate win condition is absurd and impossible. You can't make more then one creature destined without completing the tower five times, and if you have five creatures you kept alive through 25 upkeeps having given them exalted, battle cry and shroud, you should have already won the game long, long ago.

>>95873631
looping the enter shouldn't bee too hard for a combo deck to pull off

Too good? Or not good enough?

I put the "Warlocks of the Cave" text in the bottom right of cards just because I don't like leaving the space blank.

I put the "Warlocks of the Cave" text in the bottom right of cards just because I don't like leaving the space blank.

>>95757645
>Performer
While designing a deckbuilding game, I found that Performers / Bards / Artists work well when they display cards to other players. Which cards they display and how they display them are their metaphorical performance, and the key to their flavor is nailing those details in connection with the card name.

In your card, she's a starlet and she's displaying via discard. But what is she displaying? What would a starlet display? What would she gain from that display?

Start with "When you discard an instant or sorcery card this way, create a Treasure token." Replace the condition and payoff to suit your set, slot, and thematic needs.

it's a card

>>95879578
>snow mana
>not a snow permanent

Thoughts?

>>95880366
download MSE

Did anyone else feel obliged to make custom cards for their deck after any of the Universes Beyond sets failed to make their ideal deck with their ideal franchise or is it just me? Mr. House fans got shafted so hard, I would rather literally custom proxy my whole deck than play a bunch of D and Dork cards with him.

>>95880104
yeah it's something different
i'm funny like that

I've finished reading Buzzati's Sixty Stories, maybe I'll make cards themed around them

>>95880366
The additional main phase clause is only needed when a sorcery in the second main phase gives you another attack.

>>95881015
I agree with your sentiment

>>95881015
What are you on, Mr House literally was the perfect card.

>>95883225
Inescapable Doom can have a much, much more forgiving Suspend cost and still be a fair card. Suspend 7 is completely absurd.

>>95880104
far be it a card doesn't rigidly follow WOTC design rules

>>95757645
"Open the Gates" is already a card. Perhaps try "Break Down the Gates"

Is there a way to create rules text loyalty symbols that are >9 in MSE a la Ichormoon Gauntlet?

I only see 0-9 and X as options for M15 Mainframe.

Made a proxy of Khimari from the Final Fantasy set. Seeing as Monoco is also a blue mage I thought it fitting.

>>95889276

How goeth thine sets?

>>95892851
I just received the copy of my set+expansion I ordered from MPC. I am happy with the result.

Anyone here designed cards for extremely high power cubes? I'm talking vintage level cards, maybe even higher