>>95815806
Rich people won't drag you along a truck, fine. But they will order you chemically castrated, or hung for sodomy, or given a patch and sent to camps to systematically be killed. Instead of
>I hate that guy because he makes me uncomfortable
It's
>Here's a fifty-page essay I use to rationalize my discomfort and turn it into a legal basis for oppression which will become actual law
Rich people will do literally everything they blame poor people for, and they'll also do it on a massive scale, except they won't get their hands dirty personally, because that's beneath them.
>How come it was the rich who launched the revolt against the institutions of slavery?
Because the law answered to them. Again, opinions are for people with free time. You might as well ask why they only started caring after centuries. After all, they had the chance to implement it during the American Revolution, but they didn't.
Additionally, people paid to get out of Union service (and have done so to get out of other military service for the causes they "champion"). It cost $300 and was called the Conscription Act.
When people in charge of the system claim about systemic problems, I feel very little sympathy.
>Are you just saying whatever pops up in your head in the moment and you're reacting against whoever is speaking in a mindless, childish oppositional defiance behavioral pattern?
Do I think that people who saw 80% of their own countrymen as unworthy of marriage (that's not racism it's "nobility", btw) as more prejudiced than people who are literally just trying to stay alive? Yes, I do.
Social ills almost always flow from the top down rather than the bottom up, because if they were actually a problem for the ruling elite, that elite would have gone out of their way to fix them. Moreover, the elite have regularly and consistently chosen to erect totally legal means by which to punish people for having Wrong Opinions or Wrong Qualities.
They 'care' when it benefits them. That's all.
