>>95820745 (OP)Regular races don't do it for me, I always pick weird or unusual.
Whether it's kobolds, tinker rats, (fantasy) robots, or even a sapient slime, I would pick them over the human/dorf/elf any day.
Also, all this fairy posting makes me want to pick one for a giggle next time I find myself a game.
Not for that size difference fetish stuff โ the idea of being a pint-sized terror flitting around the battlefield poking out eyes with a tiny magic rapier has me stoked.
Especially if I'd otherwise pretend to be sweet and innocent. Love this kind of contrast and expectation subversion.
>>95852408Excessive association with some fetish stuff, to the point of being nigh-inseparable from it.
I.e. fairies and the various cum jar/vore/unbirth/what have you. Or halflings and noncery. Anthros and degenerate furfaggotry.
This makes ME feel like the weird one for wanting to play an alien space %insert_species% character as an actual alien, and not everyone's favorite exotic lay.
>having races that are inherently evil instead of just having abnormal moralitiesI kinda agree, and kinda disagree. Inherently evil usually means being either born of evil (i.e. demons) or having been corrupted by it to the point of being part-demon (i.e. gnolls in some settings).
Moral relativism may fall victim to ontological good/evil beings and races. You'd need to deconstruct this to make way for "alternative morality", otherwise it all will boil down to siding with either the God, or the Devil.