>>95820745 (OP)
Regular races don't do it for me, I always pick weird or unusual.
Whether it's kobolds, tinker rats, (fantasy) robots, or even a sapient slime, I would pick them over the human/dorf/elf any day.
Also, all this fairy posting makes me want to pick one for a giggle next time I find myself a game.
Not for that size difference fetish stuff β the idea of being a pint-sized terror flitting around the battlefield poking out eyes with a tiny magic rapier has me stoked.
Especially if I'd otherwise pretend to be sweet and innocent. Love this kind of contrast and expectation subversion.
>>95852408
Excessive association with some fetish stuff, to the point of being nigh-inseparable from it.
I.e. fairies and the various cum jar/vore/unbirth/what have you. Or halflings and noncery. Anthros and degenerate furfaggotry.
This makes ME feel like the weird one for wanting to play an alien space %insert_species% character as an actual alien, and not everyone's favorite exotic lay.
>having races that are inherently evil instead of just having abnormal moralities
I kinda agree, and kinda disagree. Inherently evil usually means being either born of evil (i.e. demons) or having been corrupted by it to the point of being part-demon (i.e. gnolls in some settings).
Moral relativism may fall victim to ontological good/evil beings and races. You'd need to deconstruct this to make way for "alternative morality", otherwise it all will boil down to siding with either the God, or the Devil.