Thread 95897233

Characters, Scenes, Landscapes etc.

>>95900209
This is a good one!

>>95897233 (OP)
Last thread we head iconics from Frazetta, Caldwell and other giants, now we instantly had puckee commisions and basic bitch digital art.
Why couldn't we just let the old thread die gracefully?

bumperino

>>95903491
And this last one isn't really fantasy, but I like how it captures the imposing size of the pyramid. people at bottom for reference.

Doomping Adrian Smith's Conan concept art

>>95903815
wait I meant to post this one

>>95901880
link to the last thread? I need some for my campaign.

>>95903830
It's still in the catalog, if you look for 10/10 fantasy art

>>95901880
The old thread also had some puckee slop too, the fag can't help himself but spam his slop

>>95903815
Why is there so much utterly bizarre fanart of Dragonball characters doing things like this?

>>95907112
It's bound to happen when you have an IP that is as mega popular as Dragon Ball, with the addition of all of the ridiculousness like a group of people named after vegetables and a doctor and his creations called Bippity, Boppity, and Buu, among other crazy shit. The setting itself lends towards ridiculous things, so why not fanart?

>>95904754
It's just easy trolling.

Anyone got some dwarf stuff? It can Be characters, landscapes or anything really.

>>95910312
>>95910315

>>95910319
>>95910312

>>95910321
>>95910312

>>95910312
>>95910327

>>95910312
>>95910331

>>95910333
>>95910312

>>95910335
>>95910312

>>95910337
>>95910312

>>95910312
>>95910338

>>95910312
>>95910341

>>95910354
>>95910312

>>95910359
>>95910312

>>95910360
>>95910312

>>95910364
>>95910312

>>95903491
Ka Nama Kaa Lajerama!

>>95901880
This shit always happens. People will start with or make something cool and then dullards have to spam it into the ground in an avalanche of crap by making everything a borderline general.

>>95911251
Nope

>>95897233 (OP)
Generally what makes a fantasy art 10/10 in the opinions of those around here?

I'm addicted to the ridiculously huge structures/cities of Dark Souls 3's setting. But I understand not everyone likes it.

>>95901880
holy, you weren't kidding. Man what a contrast between threads

Ascalon load screen from Guild Wars

Dry Top load screen from Guild Wars 2

>>95922121
>>95922140
the GW artwork has always been great

>>95900209
Newfags can't triforce

>>95920728
>"Generally what makes a fantasy art 10/10 in the opinions of those around here?"
1) Graphically: minimally pleasing
2) Logically: coherent scene
3) Innovatively: more or less unique situation more or less specific to the world represented (natural phenomenon, social activity, animal behaviour, etc.)

I'm alright with huge structures if it makes some sense inworld. But the trope eventually gets old by itself.

>enter 10/10 art thread
>most art is mid
many such cases

>>95927041
Enlighten us on what is 10/10 art then oh sage bumper

>>95928125
What the fuck happened to that? Who fucked around with Parkinson's painting and made that abomination?

>>95897233 (OP)
This town needs a giant funicular for portaging boats past the waterfall

>>95926576
Realism?

>>95935264
It looks like a stream in the mountains that for whatever reason has pooled into a waterfall. There probably isn't much upstream, but apparently they still have sailboats and triremes.

>10/10 art
more like 10/10 of the first 10 posts are generic looking crap

>>95897267
that's not fantasy!
bears are real animals, dummy!

>>95920728
ARTdragon PEAK

>>95938133
Bending your suspension of disbelief without breaking it is important to it being 10/10 FANTASY. Slavish adherence to realism is fagballs.

>>95941953
It's a GUY in a SUIT they're not real fuck you

>>95920728
It's about style. >>95911251 is just some bloke standing around but it has so much more style than >>95906643 which feels comparatively tryhard.
>I spent 10 minutes or rewriting to sum up my art pleb tastes, but in the end it boils down to "If I like it, I like it."
lol

>>95942545
>comparatively tryhard
NTA but by that logic >>95911251 feel comparatively lazier and less inspired than >>95906643 which tried to inspire an epic battle at every level of detail.

>my tastes are objectively superior to yours

>>95943428
I suppose, but I guess it's subjective. >>95906643 has a lot of action going on sure, but I find the aesthetics and posing to be pretty lame and milquetoast (very Warhammery to me).

>MY tastes are objectively superior to YOURS

>>95949574
I can understand why you'd not be surprised since the pic is obviously using tropes that are almost overused by now.
But the quality of the art and attention to details remains, without going overboard with colors or pointlessly flashy effect.

>>MY tastes are objectively superior to YOURS
Only by criteria that are meaningless, while mine are infinitely relevant.

>>95927041
>>95941411
>complains
>contributes nothing
They're not sending their best.

>>95942539
kek

>>95952054
ORANGE TRANSPARENT CHAINSAW!

>>95897233 (OP)
The bridges are built like dams. Especially that one on the left, its extremities are filled like a dam but it's simply a bridge. That means they wasted a shit ton of concrete for no reason. Just because the artist drew a dam and opened holes into it to turn it into a bridge. It bothers me, 4/10 art.

>>95955308
It's a form of power projection. The kingdom is wealthy enough that it can dedicate the resources to purely aesthetic overbuilding. if you can't appreciate that level of fuck you I'm rich, you're too poor to allowed an opinion.

>>95952054
>pic
....that's a lego ads isn't it?

>>95957535
kek

>>95955693
I'm hoping that they're using all that water flow to produce magical power for something. That'd be neat (and spillways are necessary in dams).

>>95909407
>"For Ilene!"
Gets me every time, man. Every. Time.