>>95918202>there's no way rpgnet didn'tAh yes you must suck your RPG.NET god off.
Sadly these are their professional reviews.
>>95918404>I google searched the phrase,You mean you managed to not see the URL in the picture?
https://wiki.rpg.net/index.php/FATALReviewRebuttal
>>95918599Lets see this cringe in action keep in mind these are the retards idiots to this day keep on parroting. Pure cringe and failure at comedy.
Sartin: He's not joking, people, and I wasn't, either. Those of you wondering what the most ass-tastic RPG of all time would look like - the one whose suck factor will forever demolish all challengers and tower over the ages with all the majesty of a homeless, mindless, drooling, shit-obsessed, impotent moron standing on a mountain of used Dragon Ball Z condoms - can finally die in peace.
The arguments are over. Anyone who says anything else is the worst RPG ever will...well, I'll inject kerosene into my bladder, piss on them, and then set them on fire. This game sucks THAT much.
Godfuckingdammit. We're hardly four words into the review, and already the game has dragged me down to its level.
So, why is it so bad?
'Cause it's the Necronomicon of role-playing games. Not in the cool way, where it's a source of occult knowledge with a terrible, terrible price. It's the Necronomicon in the sense that if you leave a printed copy on your shelf with other RPGs, then the other RPGs will be clustered around the dead, violated body of one of its own in the morning. The copy of FATAL will most likely be down at the station in the Sex Crimes interrogation room, trying its best to put on an innocent face and failing miserably.
YIKES! CRINGE! Imagine not bullying these retards for their retardation.
And this LGBT+ rainbow is in their logo see
https://forum.rpg.net/index.php