>>95913550Well, that's a darn shame, because I find little fairy faggots to be pretty boring. Especially because in many fantasy settings, these critters exist right next to actual Tolkien (rather D&D) elves without any problem, since they tend to occupy different niches with some overlap.
Also, his elves were never better at everything, and even being superhuman can be somewhat questionable. A lot of the superhuman traits come from the Silmarillion where you can have other astonishing feats performed by humans.
They also don't tend to be the bestest at everything, like dwarves outsmithing them (in certain areas, like armor), or Turin being able to wear a heavy helmet that no elf could wear. There are other aspects, like no elf is actually good at anything by default, they have to learn everything from scratch. Whereas Tolkien noted that humans can have an instinctual "knack" for things. That's completely beyond his elves. There is also minor things like humans being the superior at husbandry and breeding horses and livestock.
A lot of their supposed superiority is ultimately the result of them learning, training, devoting themselves, improving.
And, as mentioned in some other post, this is completely missing the narrative purpose of his elves, why they are like this. You can dislike how he writes them (and apparently, you haven't read enough), but you have to acknowledge how he's thorough and consistent with his themes and how his elves play into them, and what purpose they fulfill. They are like this because there is a reason.
>>95913573Is there no place for a race like in a setting? Is there no past in a setting?
>Meanwhile, not codifying them into concrete creaturesNobody is codifying anything, you are free to write your elves exactly how you want.
>depending on what the story and setting needAnd often, you want a magical ancient race in your setting. What's the problem with that?