Thread 96136146 - /tg/ [Archived: 16 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/20/2025, 7:14:48 AM No.96136146
1322357809845
1322357809845
md5: 5f98bdb84276adfd0119d31d19f1a1c5🔍
What kind of rules do your games have about female armor?
Replies: >>96136150 >>96136193 >>96138209 >>96138256 >>96138611 >>96138738 >>96138962 >>96138997 >>96139100 >>96139146 >>96139562 >>96139636 >>96139731 >>96139758 >>96139769 >>96140122 >>96141498 >>96142481 >>96144339 >>96144575 >>96144603 >>96146157 >>96146428 >>96146484 >>96152273 >>96158649
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 7:17:41 AM No.96136150
>>96136146 (OP)
wether realistic or bikink chainmail, I like it and use them all
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 7:23:58 AM No.96136171
1610307945543
1610307945543
md5: df28faa223852ef453fd3a256652ee5f🔍
Boob Plate gives +4 strength when worn by a woman.

Chainmail bikini gives +4 strength and doubles exceptional strength if worn by a woman.
Replies: >>96140099 >>96151617
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 7:30:21 AM No.96136187
The rule at my table is that women can't wear ANYTHING and then we jerk off each other under the table pretending it's a woman who jerks us off
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 7:32:02 AM No.96136193
>>96136146 (OP)
Rule of Cool. Eception is ars magica. where the idea of female armor is riddiculed except by the fey, who give no fucks about biological limits or metalurgy.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 7:35:30 AM No.96136203
>cheesecake thread
:)
>cheesecake thread with an annoying premise guaranteed to spiral into shitposting
:(
Replies: >>96138186
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 3:44:36 PM No.96138186
>>96136203
This has always been a funny debate because, if we're being honest, the idea of female warriors is so ridiculous that the armour they wear is completely irrelevant. It's like letting slip you have a dragon for a wife and then going into detail about lingerie she wears. Yes it's ridiculous that a dragon would wear lingerie, but the more pertinent question is how did you marry and fuck a dragon?
Replies: >>96138209 >>96138634 >>96138773 >>96138919 >>96140676 >>96140699
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 3:48:02 PM No.96138209
>>96136146 (OP)
Same as male armor. Armor is armor.
>>96138186
>how did you marry and fuck a dragon
Donkey.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 3:58:31 PM No.96138256
>>96136146 (OP)
The less, the better.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 4:49:32 PM No.96138611
Queen's Blade Unlimited
Queen's Blade Unlimited
md5: d7bcb387b7574a68ac94a5995c521214🔍
>>96136146 (OP)
Regardless of how skimpy or covering thier armor is, we're using hardcore ecchi rules so a knight wearing armor that completely hides her figure will still be a fanservicey gal because that armor will crumble to pieces wherever it is hit.
Replies: >>96138923
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 4:52:07 PM No.96138634
>>96138186
didn't the romans have issues for thinking that way?
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 5:08:05 PM No.96138738
>>96136146 (OP)
You need to properly enchant the female to wear her as an armor, but once you do, a female armor is as good as steel armor for protection and adds to your Charisma score for people who can see you wearing her.
Also, if you don't amputate her arms and legs, she can still be used as a beast of burden, at the cost of weighting somewhat more.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 5:11:21 PM No.96138773
>>96138186
It's always been a funny debate because retarded people like you who don't know anything keep saying stupid things.
Replies: >>96142855
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 5:30:24 PM No.96138919
>>96138186
Nah, I can suspend disbelief for female warriors the same way I can for wizards and dragons. Chainmail bikinis and over the top boobplate on the other hand, break it.
I think it's probably just because I don't like the aesthetic. It's the same for those ridiculous anime-style giant swords.
Replies: >>96138963 >>96140420
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 5:30:45 PM No.96138923
>>96138611
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 5:37:27 PM No.96138962
Aasimar_01
Aasimar_01
md5: 00ce1c06e1a6f8ecea22aa924eb79fb2🔍
>>96136146 (OP)
If it's a light hearted noblebright fantasy setting, less is more, though if it's a Joan of Arc type she can be heavily armored as long as it's vaguely form fitting.

If it's "serious" or grim fantasy, none because women aren't capable of standing up to men in a fight and no one in their right mind would waste time on making armor for a woman who's just going to get her thinner bones crushed forever by the first glancing polearm blow to the hip.
Replies: >>96138974 >>96144200
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 5:37:30 PM No.96138963
>>96138919
If you have to suspend disbelief for something that existed then you are probably not smart enough to be in this hobby.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 5:39:22 PM No.96138974
>>96138962
>t. retarded child who is not capable of fighting anything man or woman.
Replies: >>96146053
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 5:42:47 PM No.96138997
>>96136146 (OP)
Depends on what system. Which is?
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 5:54:52 PM No.96139053
7c0c40002c1cdd5888ca8fb16561a7625a7e47167fe0603f7ebddc579faf7ab9
>anti-boob fanatics will decry this because it bulges outwards
Replies: >>96139066 >>96139991 >>96144206
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 5:57:22 PM No.96139066
>>96139053
There's a subset of people who approve boob armor if its for men.
Replies: >>96139991
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 6:05:03 PM No.96139100
>>96136146 (OP)
None.
If a player wants a character to look sexy or the opposite, they can, within the general parameters of the setting.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 6:13:19 PM No.96139146
>>96136146 (OP)
Hot chicks are immune to crits, ugly ones are always crit hits.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 7:06:09 PM No.96139562
IMG_1612
IMG_1612
md5: ebdbad7fc0657cde462e80a1237f4670🔍
>>96136146 (OP)
No clothes at all. The more nude they are, the stronger.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 7:15:20 PM No.96139636
Heavy
Heavy
md5: 155cc68529b0b6cbe3e972d0d31bd9fc🔍
>>96136146 (OP)
Similar to male armor really - basic variants of armor have some leeway in size of the wearer can be re-issued or looted without much difficulty. Best armor is always custom fit made for body of one specific person.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 7:26:55 PM No.96139731
clothed sexier than naked
clothed sexier than naked
md5: 59d96958b81eca226cc808aef16d26be🔍
>>96136146 (OP)
Clothes are sexier than naked so correctly coordinating your character's fashion gets you charisma boosts.
Replies: >>96140105
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 7:30:06 PM No.96139758
>>96136146 (OP)
nice pic, thanks op, your thread is shit tho
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 7:31:23 PM No.96139769
>>96136146 (OP)
I just use the Bulletproof nudity cinematic rules. And they all max their sex appeal and erotic arts skills.
As always GURPS has the best rules.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 8:06:53 PM No.96139991
>>96139053
The boob WEDGE is infinitely superior, because it diverts the blow away, rather than guiding it directly into the sternum.
>>96139066
>for men
>men
Anon, that's a woman.
Replies: >>96140017 >>96140354 >>96141463 >>96144582
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 8:12:36 PM No.96140017
>>96139991
Man boobs is a thing. If you look in a mirror you may see some.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 8:29:30 PM No.96140099
>>96136171
Thought she was wearing a Vault suit from the thumbnail.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 8:30:31 PM No.96140105
>>96139731
Is that fucking Guntribe?
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 8:32:26 PM No.96140122
849375454
849375454
md5: 5185ab23c3ee1adc4038754186b8babf🔍
>>96136146 (OP)
female armor works just the same as male armor, no matter how revealing or impractical. No one will ever point out the local flaws, they just go with it
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 9:16:25 PM No.96140354
>>96139991
>Anon, that's a woman.
yeah, but you didn't see people complaining when they didn't know Samus was a woman, they though
>woah, what a cool manly armor! I want one like that!
Replies: >>96140765
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 9:27:16 PM No.96140420
>>96138919
Dragons and wizards existing is reflected in the setting and its societies in a reasonable way most of the time. Female warriors never are.
Replies: >>96140676 >>96140699 >>96140732 >>96141980
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 10:12:40 PM No.96140676
Nuremberg_chronicles_-_f_19v_1
Nuremberg_chronicles_-_f_19v_1
md5: ade9c10158d2ebf605d107938f841a55🔍
>>96138186
>>96140420
Female warriors were part of medieval folktales, there are illustrations of amazons and tales of their queendom in medieval chronicles. I think they fit medieval fantasy just fine.
Replies: >>96142568 >>96152684
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 10:16:11 PM No.96140699
>>96138186
>>96140420
I always find it funny when retards like this spout off about historical accuracy. When in reality men have been lusting and depicting warrior women since forever.
Replies: >>96140943 >>96146242
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 10:21:12 PM No.96140732
>>96140420
>Dragons and wizards existing is reflected in the setting and its societies in a reasonable way most of the time.
LMAO
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 10:26:15 PM No.96140765
>>96140354
That only pertains to the original NES game. 80s 8-bit sprites weren't really detailed enough to look like anything but blocky blobs with limbs. Even the 16-bit comparatively well-resolved sprite for Samus in armor for Super Metroid was still not really tightly sculpted.

(This isn't even broaching the freakish, multi-dimensional folding of the morph ball. One can only assume that the Chozo also made her part cat.)
Replies: >>96140800
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 10:31:30 PM No.96140800
>>96140765
You used the cover art to understand the blobs and Samus' armor hasn't changed much. I'd include Super Metroid in this because it came out for an audience that probably didn't play the original but before the internet spoiled that the triangular armor wasn't to hold huge pecs.

We don't talk about the morphball logistics.
Replies: >>96140933
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 10:36:21 PM No.96140836
gigachad
gigachad
md5: ba4a5315490d1e3473b9db2cb61d7e3f🔍
all-covering full plate with helmet, but the bottom layer is a lace guepierre and she takes down the updo
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 10:49:29 PM No.96140933
>>96140800
The cover art of the original NES Metroid? Seriously? It was practically just the sprites blown up a bit with blur effects to emphasize that it was a video game. Were you alive during the 80s, anon? Graphics were rough, box art could be like the original Mega Man US market cover (so reviled that Capcom made a version of the character for Street Fighter x Tekken to taunt people).
Replies: >>96140951
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 10:51:14 PM No.96140943
>>96140699
Yeah but they've been fake forever.
Replies: >>96141096 >>96141609
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 10:52:03 PM No.96140951
>>96140933
There's the european, japanese and US re-release covers with armor, plus art in the manual.
Replies: >>96141325
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 11:09:24 PM No.96141096
>>96140943
Which is perfectly acceptable in a fake game. Faggot.
Replies: >>96141505 >>96141609
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 11:36:37 PM No.96141325
>>96140951
The re-releases don't really enter into it, because the spoiler was common knowledge by then.

The manual is a strange case, because in English is intentionally misdirects you to set up said spoiler as a complete shock. The 80s were kind of a different time; this was seen as novel and interesting instead of inconsistent writing.

As for reactions to the original design? If you play literally any Metroid game, yes, you probably think that Samus's suit is cool power armor and also something that you'd want (lore issues notwithstanding*). If you're artistically inclined, it probably even formed the basis for how you saw what battle armor suits in scifi should be like.

* IIRC the lore has gone out of its way over the years to establish that Samus is not quite human and that wearing the suit would kill someone who was entirely human. Or perhaps I'm just writing over stuff from a more severe version of BA in BattleTech.
Anonymous
7/20/2025, 11:53:33 PM No.96141463
>>96139991
Unless you reinforce the shit out of the sternum area.
Replies: >>96141702
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 12:00:13 AM No.96141498
>>96136146 (OP)
Same rules as all armor: realism is ignored, and the coolest or sexiest armor is always better.
It's the exact same reason elven maille, helmet, and breastplate in warhammer are a 6+ save light armor, like empire state trooper codpieces, ogre gut plates, or minotaur belt buckles.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 12:01:44 AM No.96141505
>>96141096
Not if the game is meant to make sense.
Replies: >>96141609 >>96141739
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 12:19:29 AM No.96141609
>>96140943
>>96141096
You having a brain or knowing anything is fake.
>>96141505
You would not know sense or facts if it hit your stupid face.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 12:29:51 AM No.96141702
>>96141463
Deflection > Absorption.
You'd know this if you'd ever been in a fight.
Replies: >>96142025
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 12:35:07 AM No.96141739
>>96141505
Make sense like people shooting lightning out of their hands or fuckhuge dragons somehow being able to fly? It's fucking fantasy, anon.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 1:14:03 AM No.96141980
>>96140420
No, you are just biased. Realistically, humans are getting absolutely destroyed by stuff like dragons no matter what gender they are.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 1:19:56 AM No.96142025
>>96141702
Some extra material between the tits which you can take away from other areas due to the new shape + a stop rib so it doesn't slide up would almost certainly function just fine
>inb4
I've been doing full harness hema probably since before you were born fagtron :^)
Replies: >>96142068
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 1:27:17 AM No.96142068
>>96142025
Cool story bro, doesn't change the fact that deflection is superior to absorption when it comes to getting hit. Again, you'd know that if you'd ever been in a fight
>muh hema!
That is playing, sweet summer child.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 2:28:10 AM No.96142374
Red-Sonja
Red-Sonja
md5: 0a638eb536e0e1a6ede352b111d22e58🔍
God the ignorant, misogynistic incel shit on this website is the absolute worst part of it. Female warriors, including entirely female military units, absolutely existed historically. There are all-female military units currently in service today. We have concrete evidence of them going back over two thousand years. Learn history because this shit ain't up for debate. It's just a fact of human history.

Cheescake is fun, too.
Replies: >>96142439 >>96142499 >>96142574 >>96142618 >>96146109 >>96146732
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 2:41:31 AM No.96142439
>>96142374
>There are all-female military units currently in service today.
Like what? Those Kurdish communists? Sure, firearms can compensate for physical and mental weakness, that's why we also have battalions of child soldiers today. Even with all the assistance of modern technology they are still the exception.
>We have concrete evidence of them going back over two thousand years.
Yeah, and everyone of them was essentially a joke or larp.
Replies: >>96142445 >>96142482
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 2:42:50 AM No.96142445
>>96142439
This is such stupid nonsense that it's not worth arguing. Google it and find literally hundreds of examples.
Replies: >>96142507
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 2:48:14 AM No.96142481
snook-8-marina-karakatsani-sera-final-covered
snook-8-marina-karakatsani-sera-final-covered
md5: 5e826149dbff1e622f9b9f9267ed1265🔍
>>96136146 (OP)
They change clothes before and after each fight and also on different occasions and situations, just like real girls.
https://files.catbox.moe/y6o5qm.jpg
Replies: >>96152024
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 2:48:27 AM No.96142482
>>96142439
You are a joke, retard.
Replies: >>96142507
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 2:51:06 AM No.96142499
>>96142374
If you talk about the Amazon warriors, then you are in for a big disappointment, they weren't real, they are just an invented myth.
Replies: >>96142542
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 2:52:45 AM No.96142507
>>96142482
>>96142445
The irony is palpable
Replies: >>96142524 >>96142542 >>96142589
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 2:54:49 AM No.96142524
>>96142507
*plapable
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 2:57:25 AM No.96142542
>>96142499
>>96142507
Your wilful ignorance is why it's embarassing to admit to using this website.
Replies: >>96146109
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:04:37 AM No.96142568
>>96140676
That was all just boomer coomer shit.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:06:59 AM No.96142574
>>96142374
>he genuinely believes there were warrior women

lmao lol
Replies: >>96142589 >>96142608
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:10:47 AM No.96142589
>>96142507
Said the retard who understanding of history is at best grade school level.
>>96142574
Yes, that anon has a brain unlike you.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:15:20 AM No.96142608
>>96142574
There are only 3 possibilities:
1. This is rage bait
2. You're in active denial of reality
3. You're genuinely too dumb to use google

None of those 3 are worth engaging.
Replies: >>96142624 >>96142665 >>96142678 >>96143388 >>96146109 >>96146258
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:16:31 AM No.96142618
>>96142374
>female military units, absolutely existed historically
Proof?
Replies: >>96142624
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:18:04 AM No.96142624
>>96142618
See >>96142608
Honestly the wide availability and undeniable, overwhelming evidence just makes me assume you're rage baiting.
Replies: >>96142628 >>96146109
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:18:39 AM No.96142628
>>96142624
I just googled it and google said "Grave goods can reflect status or ritual rather than active combat roles, and no records describe women forming distinct military units"
Replies: >>96142637 >>96142658
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:19:56 AM No.96142637
>>96142628
>Claims of women-led armies or female military units lack corroboration and are likely mythical
Ah, no evidence. Thank you Google.
Replies: >>96142658
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:23:14 AM No.96142658
>>96142628
>>96142637
On the off chance that it's #3, and you're genuinely too stupid to google a questions, you can start right here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:All-female_military_units_and_formations
Replies: >>96142663 >>96142962
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:23:53 AM No.96142663
>>96142658
>reserve modern military units
Ah, thank you. I thought we were talking historically.
Replies: >>96142668 >>96150594
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:24:07 AM No.96142665
>>96142608
>if a bunch of left leaning professors say it online it must be true!

Literally any man who isn't a dyel faggot knows the idea of warrior women is a retarded larp. The stories are either made up or are describing Marc Antony tier shit like lords having symbolic units of larp women who had fake fights or were used to execute captured enemies to demoralize and mock them. At the absolute most, any warrior woman who saw actual combat would've been an individual or two that belonged to skirmishers that chased after routed men. The only actual historical evidence we have of women serving in combat lies entirely in the modern period, where firearms helped alleviate the massive physical gulf between men and women, and even then women in uniform has been extremely rare and outside of exceptions like Russian or Vietnamese women, they've always underperformed and required exceptional accommodations. No tribe discovered in the era of reliable historical documentation, whether in North or South America or the Polynesians, recorded a single reliable instance of women fighting with the men.

You're genuinely fucking stupid if you belief for a moment that women were actual warriors at any time in human history before the invention of firearms.
Replies: >>96142678 >>96142714 >>96142810 >>96143096
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:24:39 AM No.96142668
>>96142663
>Among others
Replies: >>96142700 >>96164124
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:26:22 AM No.96142678
>>96142665
>Literally any man who isn't a dyel faggot knows the idea of warrior women is a retarded larp.

>Facts don't matter because muh feelings


Please see >>96142608
>None of those 3 are worth engaging.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:30:09 AM No.96142700
>>96142668
So you don't have a single source
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:31:59 AM No.96142714
>>96142665
tl;dr wwwwaaahhh! people who know what they are talking about disagree with my retarded views so it must be some plot from the "left"
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:46:12 AM No.96142806
The dudes who believe warrior women existed, are the only dudes that women would be capable of defeating in combat.
Replies: >>96142818
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:46:32 AM No.96142810
>>96142665
The idea that every single army from 500 AD to 1900 AD wanted to lose by not using super powerful women warriors is so fucking retarded, and there is not a SINGLE source of military women outside of grave goods, which can reflect status or ritual. They have to be mentally ill to believe women warriors existed.
Replies: >>96142828
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:47:11 AM No.96142818
>>96142806
Well you're right that historians and archeologists are rarely professional MMA fighters, I suppose.
Replies: >>96142885
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:48:41 AM No.96142828
>>96142810
Or maybe you are just stupid and don't know anything.
Replies: >>96142830
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:49:08 AM No.96142830
>>96142828
>no sources
I accept your concession
Replies: >>96142849 >>96142857
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:51:16 AM No.96142849
>>96142830
Seriously you won't rage bait me into arguing about something so widely documented and easily discoverable.
Replies: >>96142854
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:52:04 AM No.96142854
>>96142849
You can't post a single source.
I accept your concession
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:52:08 AM No.96142855
>>96138773
Why is there always one white knight guy getting insanely mad whenever an anon points out that female warriors are unrealistic?
Replies: >>96142863 >>96142866 >>96142899 >>96145976
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:52:18 AM No.96142857
>>96142830
The only thing you accept is cocks in your butt.
Replies: >>96142859 >>96142880
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:53:05 AM No.96142859
>>96142857
Sorry anon, not gay (like you)
But I will accept your concession since you are crying now.
Replies: >>96142870
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:53:46 AM No.96142863
>>96142855
No one knows why retards think crying about white knights helps them in anyway. Also more than one person sees you as a moron.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:53:58 AM No.96142866
>>96142855
Because history exists and you incels are what make it embarassing to admit to using 4chan.
Replies: >>96142890 >>96144830
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:54:47 AM No.96142870
>>96142859
You say yet you post like a retarded faggot.
Replies: >>96142880
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:56:00 AM No.96142880
>>96142870
Oops, misspost.
Meant for >>96142857
Replies: >>96142965
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:56:19 AM No.96142885
>>96142818
Women are capable of killing people. However, they stand no match versus men ceteris paribus. There is no advantage of women over men in combat, excepting if there is an element of surprise or entrapment.

Female warriors are cringe. You are cringe. I guarantee you are the anon who always comes out of the woodwork any time this topic comes up. Your go to is say something akin to "you are a moron; you are a retard; everyone thinks you are stupid" etc. Your posting language is familiar to me. You resort to name calling and gas lighting.
Replies: >>96142892 >>96142970 >>96163738
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:57:37 AM No.96142890
>>96142866
>Because history exists
>no credible evidence of women warriors
Huh, weird.
Replies: >>96142908
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:57:53 AM No.96142892
>>96142885
History is irrelevant to your theory crafting, anon.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:58:45 AM No.96142899
>>96142855
I also noted this in my post. It is definitely the same anon every time.

Again, they always resort to "you are a retard, moron, etc." And "everyone thinks you are stupid, etc."

Tagged, bagged, someone put his ass on a wiki. Fucking faggot is always malding when this topic gets brought up.
Replies: >>96142989
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 3:59:45 AM No.96142908
>>96142890
Already linked you a whole list of 'em, which you pretended was only "modern" military because you didn't look. Which is the only way you can continue to believe your incel fantasy.
Replies: >>96142924
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:01:54 AM No.96142924
>>96142908
>Already linked you a whole list of 'em
The wikipedia list of modern reservists?
Replies: >>96144817
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:08:22 AM No.96142962
>>96142658
Did you even bother to look at the links? The Dahomey Amazons are the only thing on that page that is at all relevant to what people here are talking about. Even then, they are post-firearms and in 1892 were ultimately "were wiped out in a matter of hours in hand-to-hand combat after the French engaged them with a bayonet charge.[17] The Dahomey lost 86 regulars and 417 Dahomey Mino, with nearly all of those deaths being inflicted by bayonets; the French lost six soldiers.[18]"
Replies: >>96150594
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:09:15 AM No.96142965
>>96142880
Nope sorry faglord of the stupid lands.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:10:17 AM No.96142970
>>96142885
The only thing you seem to be capable of is saying stupid things.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:11:57 AM No.96142989
>>96142899
>keeps saying retarded things
>why am I being called a retard?
>it must be one anon and not that people find what I am saying to be stupid.
Replies: >>96143005
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:14:53 AM No.96143005
>>96142989
Are you a janny? Is that why you are ALWAYS malding in these threads? Drop the act, we know its you. Just come clean. Tell us your life story.
Replies: >>96143011
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:16:26 AM No.96143011
>>96143005
The only thing you know is reeeing about women existing if this thread is anything to go by.
Replies: >>96143023
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:18:14 AM No.96143023
>>96143011
>you are mad about _______ existing
Plebbitor language. Come clean. Now. Give us your lore.
Replies: >>96143032
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:19:49 AM No.96143032
>>96143023
>Plebbitor language
You are the one here who knows about that not me.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:30:32 AM No.96143096
>>96142665
counterpoint: Tomyris of the Massagatae
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 5:02:54 AM No.96143246
Imagine getting mad because some people enjoy the idea that half of your entire race isn't worthless in combat within the realm of escapist fantasy.
Replies: >>96144129
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 5:28:44 AM No.96143388
>>96142608
You have the Scythian women sometimes fighting in mixed units and that's about the closest semi-successful group to do it.

There's the Dahomey amazons, but they were complete failures

Soviets had ladies with guns mostly in defensive actions where marching burdens aren't as severe.
Replies: >>96143403 >>96144016
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 5:32:11 AM No.96143403
>>96143388
Didn't soviet also deploy some female pilots? The technology available at the time didn't make G-forces of the flight too crazy.
Replies: >>96143431
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 5:37:30 AM No.96143431
>>96143403
Ah yeah I meant to say that but forgot.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 7:47:04 AM No.96144016
>>96143388
>the Scythian women
There are firmly in "myth/legend" territory, there are no reliable historical record of them participating in a battle, only "I heard from some other guy who probably read it in Herodotus or some equally reliable text that the women of the Scythians fight in battles".
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 7:49:09 AM No.96144031
...Huh. The assmangled guy in this thread trying to seethe people into believing in historical women warriors despite his total lack of evidence writes *exactly* like an extremely mad troll who shits up /osrg/ from time to time. Humongous retarded sperglord, or bot?
Replies: >>96144058 >>96144069
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 7:53:16 AM No.96144058
>>96144031
whole board is like 80 people nowadays, it's no surprise some are pulling double duty across several threads
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 7:55:05 AM No.96144069
>>96144031
There is at least three anons in this thread who know history pass grade school so your boogeyman is clearly more than one person.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 8:08:11 AM No.96144129
>>96143246
It's also interesting to note that none of them get mad at the idea of old people in combat.
Replies: >>96144163 >>96144602 >>96144774
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 8:17:33 AM No.96144163
>>96144129
I don't think I've ever seen ttrpg property with genuinely old withered and grey person in active combat role. I guess those senile deadnaught pilots in 40k?
Replies: >>96144207
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 8:28:49 AM No.96144200
>>96138962
>as long as it's vaguely form fitting.

In fairness, IRL male plate armor was often pretty form-fitting - or at least, made to resemble an idealized male form.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 8:30:42 AM No.96144206
>>96139053
No one has a problem with the bulge; the problem is the dip in the middle which is said to direct blows to the sternum.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 8:30:42 AM No.96144207
>>96144163
what do you mean by ttrpg property?
Like, a game with an old man class? There has to be a wuxia game with that since it's a classic trope.
Replies: >>96144238
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 8:41:30 AM No.96144238
>>96144207
Actual gameplay, rulebook sample character, NPC in a module, anything. I guess there's occasional special someone like Elminster, but regular non-magical old man that isn't either demi-god himself or backed by one doing active fighting is pretty rare.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 9:19:19 AM No.96144339
>>96136146 (OP)
I came across two 3.5 supplement called Chainmail Bikini and Sisters of Rapture, all female PCs are required to use them, my group has never been happier.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 10:12:59 AM No.96144487
3f77e04a42e47a4a082b2cb211140d3d
3f77e04a42e47a4a082b2cb211140d3d
md5: bbcd7d72884fb09f3151bf46ffbb8cfa🔍
Metal skirts. No pants.
Replies: >>96144497 >>96155684
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 10:16:16 AM No.96144497
>>96144487
Make the skirts mid-thigh to knee-length and that's what the Romans did.
Replies: >>96147055
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 10:51:17 AM No.96144575
image-2
image-2
md5: fbdf7135fa03bfe50c2a3b5d539d3f1c🔍
>>96136146 (OP)
Women get armor bonuses depending on how frilly or skimpy the armor is (yes, these two traits can be stacked) and maluses the more it covers.

These modifiers are reversed if the woman in question is ugly, but being an ugly female locks you into an evil character so it doesn't come up often.
Replies: >>96144761
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 10:53:23 AM No.96144582
>>96139991
Didn't some youtuber deboonk the MUH FORCE DIVERSION cope you anti-aesthetics queers always cling to?
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 10:59:02 AM No.96144602
>>96144129
Modern militaries expect a 65+ year old man to perform at the same fitness standards as an under-25 woman. Or to rephrase that in a way you won't like, the average woman at her peak fitness is the same as an elderly man.
Replies: >>96144624
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 10:59:05 AM No.96144603
videoframe_6083
videoframe_6083
md5: 83595b09a6f827ec6ce6f52b0357b733🔍
>>96136146 (OP)
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 11:04:58 AM No.96144624
>>96144602
Which is fair, standards should be the same regardless of age or gender.
Replies: >>96144657 >>96144685
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 11:13:27 AM No.96144657
>>96144624
That's how a few countries do it, leaving you with 5-10% women in the infantry.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 11:22:29 AM No.96144685
>>96144624
>Which is fair
>standards should be the same regardless of age or gender
These two statements completely contradict one another AND the information provided. Did you even read my post?
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 11:48:39 AM No.96144761
>>96144575
so burkhas are power limiters?
Replies: >>96144847
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 11:51:34 AM No.96144774
>>96144129
I don't "get mad about it," but i would not mind age-related modifiers too.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 12:05:07 PM No.96144817
>>96142924
NTA, but women are shithouse soldiers. literally worse than conscripting retarded men. they are ONLY an active detriment.
and ZERO women have EVER legitimately passed any SOF training. they ALWAYS fail it and are 'passed' under utterly retarded conditions because MUH VAGINAS.

you are better off going into combat with a fucking BLANK file than even 'the best' female 'warrior'.
Replies: >>96145054 >>96146537 >>96146562
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 12:10:58 PM No.96144830
>>96142866
>incels
thank you for outing yourself as a blue pilled faggot retard pussy worshipping loser who is incapable of living in objective reality.

the william's sisters,the 'best' tennis players women had, lost in straight sets, one after another, to the men's world # 500+. an over the hilll pudgy bloke who had spent his morning drinking booze and smoking and playing golf with his friends. the tennis match wassuch a fucking nuking for him, he didn't bother to stop drinking booze or smoking throughout the match. and he brutally fucking destroyed them.

the best women's basketballers cannot dunk, they cannot do three pointers.

the worlds women's number 1 football team routinely loses to u15 and u17 boys teams.

and those are just contests of athleticism.
you add actual stress and danger to things.

>female firefighters being incapable of handle the hoses etc.
>female ambos
over and over, women prove they CANNOT do any actual REAL, dangerous jobs.

go forth and fuck thine own face, you fucking SIMP.
Replies: >>96144854 >>96144871 >>96146537
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 12:20:25 PM No.96144847
>>96144761
Unless she's wearing just the hood, yes. Masks of any variety are erotic so a girl wearing a mask/helmet but skimpy/frilly armor gets a full on multiplier instead of just an additive modifier
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 12:22:11 PM No.96144854
>>96144830
Don't forget female cops being unable to control a scene and resorting to magdumping a perp the momemt they feel the slightest twinge of panic
Replies: >>96144904 >>96146537
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 12:27:21 PM No.96144871
>>96144830
>all of this in a thread about a fantasy trope in a board about fantasy games
lmao
Replies: >>96144903
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 12:32:54 PM No.96144903
>>96144871
This is exactly what OP wanted, thoever
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 12:33:19 PM No.96144904
>>96144854
and TASER TASER TASER retard bitch.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 1:20:19 PM No.96145054
>>96144817
>and ZERO women have EVER legitimately passed any SOF training. they ALWAYS fail it and are 'passed' under utterly retarded conditions because MUH VAGINAS.

It's a good thing that Special Forces ate like 1% of the military then. Even if we eliminate all infantry, we're still looking well over 90% of jobs.

Hell, what percentage of the military is just desk jobs where there's really no strength requirement?
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:43:03 PM No.96145976
>>96142855
This entire thread has devolved into a giant bait magnet where some discord tranny(s?) are "farming lols" by trying to say warrior women actually existed. Just accept this and move on and stop giving them (You)s.
Replies: >>96146338 >>96146585
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 4:53:14 PM No.96146053
1579530978993
1579530978993
md5: 562799e820377e7d64058f6482a8cd3d🔍
>>96138974
Please, enlightened feminist Anon, explain to how us how women are totally able to compete with men in physical disciplines up to the highest level of prowess. I need a laugh today.
Replies: >>96146333 >>96146546
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 5:03:07 PM No.96146109
829d8550f5168df514d1a8ec5042af0b_sm
829d8550f5168df514d1a8ec5042af0b_sm
md5: 24aa280ea223d298de17c1a1a2c47843🔍
>>96142374
>>96142542
>>96142608
>>96142624
>Not a SINGLE source to back up his 'easily verifiable' claims
Huh. Really makes one ponder.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 5:13:20 PM No.96146157
4bf16771caeea74185b5991c1fa1e70d
4bf16771caeea74185b5991c1fa1e70d
md5: 468de24d71a93eb94240cc473d08095e🔍
>>96136146 (OP)
I don't permit females to be depicted at all in the first place, so I never have problems.
Replies: >>96146597 >>96151282
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 5:28:48 PM No.96146242
>>96140699
...and your point is?
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 5:31:27 PM No.96146258
>>96142608
All google spits out is extreme fringe cases of women taking up arms as a last resort or because they're part of a society where you literally have to be able to fend for yourself at all times to not be left behind, neither of which is really relevant to the discussion because neither fit what you want.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 5:40:12 PM No.96146319
Kafi
Kafi
md5: ed6366b42794a1bca0d0e1391f6a0e33🔍
Aesthetics > Function
Attacks that are below AC, completely resisted/tanked/nullified or somesuch are either absorbed by the material if the character wears realistic/plausible armour, or dodged if the character is a feast for the eyes
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 5:42:11 PM No.96146333
>>96146053
>GIF
>it's not the whole sequence
I am disappoint.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 5:43:23 PM No.96146338
>>96145976
Damn, that's even sadder than if they believe that shit. Posting contentless bait and getting their assholes blown out are what passes as comedy to them? Trangic.
Replies: >>96146585
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 5:56:15 PM No.96146428
1748532561900509
1748532561900509
md5: 1a0bce74967add7d3b24cd186b89776b🔍
>>96136146 (OP)
Women in my games don't get to wear armor or be in any position of power or responsibility.
Sorry holes, I just prefer realism in my fantasy heh.
Replies: >>96146492 >>96146496 >>96150843
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:02:48 PM No.96146484
>>96136146 (OP)
Every time damage goes through an article of clothing or piece of armor rips off. It doesn't really lower armor class, but I describe bare breast slipping out or whatever.
Replies: >>96146502
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:04:29 PM No.96146492
>>96146428
Yes. realismfags don't know anything and are too retarded to play tabletop games.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:05:26 PM No.96146496
>>96146428
That's not realism, it's just morals.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:06:48 PM No.96146502
1424652356386
1424652356386
md5: 9329c518afc946fab55310589e5569e9🔍
>>96146484
Replies: >>96146689
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:10:21 PM No.96146537
>>96144817
Source: my retarded ass.
>>96144830
>>96144854
t. brain dead children who have trouble going up stairs going durr durr women are weak derp
Replies: >>96146564 >>96146616
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:11:34 PM No.96146546
>>96146053
Your stupid existence is a laugh.
Replies: >>96146564 >>96146616
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:13:24 PM No.96146562
>>96144817
I am pretty sure they would rather take a out of shape woman than someone like you.
Replies: >>96146616
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:13:55 PM No.96146564
>>96146537
>>96146546
What do you gain from low effort ragebait such as that? Do you just enjoy actively driving down the board's quality of posts? Go fuck yourself.
Replies: >>96146624
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:15:43 PM No.96146585
>>96145976
>>96146338
>If you know anything other than taking cocks you are a discord tranny
Replies: >>96146616
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:16:44 PM No.96146597
>>96146157
Sure, being nogames does let you avoid games stuff.
Replies: >>96146621
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:18:25 PM No.96146616
>>96146537
>>96146546
>>96146562
>>96146585
>avalance of assblasted samefagging
L M A O
Replies: >>96146657
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:19:02 PM No.96146621
>>96146597
I'll tell my Friday group that we've apparently not been meeting for thirteen years.
Replies: >>96146657
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:19:22 PM No.96146624
>>96146564
>t, the retard who is driving down the board's quality of posts
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:20:56 PM No.96146637
1749132869256515
1749132869256515
md5: 481fcb4241eb97be9bb6ff9a1ce4eb9a🔍
Heavy armor is good.
Bikini armor is good.
Women fighters are good no matter how much people argue about whether it's "realistic" or not.
Shut up and post more women in armor.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:23:37 PM No.96146657
>>96146616
Yes, you are a retard who has no idea what samefagging is.
>>96146621
You fucking men in the butt is not playing tabletop games. Or at least the kind /tg/ talks about.
Replies: >>96146667
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:25:41 PM No.96146667
>>96146657
I'm sure they'll also be excited to hear that you fantasize about anal sex with them.
Replies: >>96146760
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:27:42 PM No.96146689
>>96146502
If that was her starting point she'd be naked after stubbing her toe.
Replies: >>96146706
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:29:27 PM No.96146706
>>96146689
She'd have a negative integer overflow and wrap back around to full winter parka midway during breeding.
Replies: >>96146726
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:32:02 PM No.96146726
>>96146706
I'm gonna steal that for gags. Next time some broad who's already down to her knickers gets doubletapped a full EOD suit plops into existence around her.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:32:29 PM No.96146732
>>96142374
Ok redditor
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:34:33 PM No.96146754
No more (You)s, Will. Fuck off and die.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 6:35:09 PM No.96146760
>>96146667
Yes, I am sure they will love to hear your fantasies about anons in /tg/
Replies: >>96148886
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 7:12:12 PM No.96147055
6f73d43ffb0b0e92e95a2bf90a00c45a
6f73d43ffb0b0e92e95a2bf90a00c45a
md5: 51d05ee61c9974f4e1246898171c8124🔍
>>96144497
Maybe, but first we need some pantie shots.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 10:35:14 PM No.96148886
>>96146760
No one is fantasizing about you, anon. That's why fantasizing in public about men having anal sex is all you have.
Replies: >>96149046
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 10:54:12 PM No.96149046
>>96148886
It's okay. You can fantasize about me if you want. You can be yourself.
Replies: >>96149376
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 11:19:09 PM No.96149273
Okay, my humans are now realistic and also extinct because there's no way they could realistically outcompete all the other fantasy creatures without being shielded by plot armor.
Replies: >>96149387 >>96149404
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 11:30:49 PM No.96149376
1749496678169110
1749496678169110
md5: 4231fa00c1a325aa2726c85e09ddda6b🔍
>>96149046
It would not be ok. I'm not into bestiality. So I'm fine being myself.
Replies: >>96149737
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 11:31:50 PM No.96149387
>>96149273
Thank god. Finally we can get away from Tolkienian races.
Anonymous
7/21/2025, 11:34:58 PM No.96149404
>>96149273
But anon, don't you know that we breathe oxygen which is, like, poisonous and part fire?
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 12:36:54 AM No.96149737
>>96149376
You say yet you keep having sex with yourself.
Replies: >>96150625
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 2:47:31 AM No.96150594
>>96142663
See >>96142962
READ the links.
For example, the anti air USSR female unit held for two days without support against German infantry and armor with AA guns they used as direct fire platforms.
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 2:51:43 AM No.96150625
>>96149737
God damn, child, you should not be here. You are in the wrooooong part of the internet for that shit.
Replies: >>96150794
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 3:19:15 AM No.96150794
>>96150625
Then get going Faggotry Pants
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 3:27:16 AM No.96150843
>>96146428
This but unironically
Replies: >>96150954
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 3:45:12 AM No.96150954
>>96150843
Sorry to hear that you are unironically too stupid to play tabletop games.
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 4:38:00 AM No.96151282
>>96146157
I look like this and smell like this
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 6:07:14 AM No.96151617
>>96136171
thought this was fallout from the thumbnail
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 8:37:39 AM No.96152024
>>96142481
I am yet to meet a real girl who would use that as formal attire.
Replies: >>96152153 >>96152352
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 10:07:59 AM No.96152153
>>96152024
I thought you MUH FEMALE FIGHTERZ types loved to bray on and on about how it's just fantasy
Replies: >>96152235
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 10:37:02 AM No.96152235
>>96152153
If you are fantasising about women dressing like whores you can head over to Lewd rpg general >>96065553 and stay the fuck away from my table.
Replies: >>96152264
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 10:46:30 AM No.96152264
>>96152235
You don't have a table, pearl-clutching culture warrior
Replies: >>96152289
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 10:50:15 AM No.96152273
>>96136146 (OP)
Is that a puss?!
Replies: >>96152312 >>96153216
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 10:54:55 AM No.96152289
>>96152264
>Thinks men sit around a table imagining half naked women for 3 hours a week.
Whatever you say buddy.
Replies: >>96152488 >>96163797
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 11:01:45 AM No.96152312
>>96152273
doubt that, it' some sort of pelt for sure, but more likely from goat or some such cattle, not a housepet
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 11:16:22 AM No.96152352
>>96152024
leave your house, you won't see many girls inside.
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 12:03:05 PM No.96152488
>>96152289
>Thinks men sit around a table imagining ugly women for 3 hours a week.
Every game I've been apart of has had attractive women in it. I'm sorry you either don't know what it's like to have friends or are so ideologically captured that even imagining pretty ladies is thoughtcrime of the highest order to you.
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 1:12:11 PM No.96152684
>>96140676
Keep AIslop in AIslop threads. No genuine pictures of historical female warriors exist.
Replies: >>96153915 >>96156400 >>96157152
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 3:40:20 PM No.96153216
>>96152273
Yes. A nice bushy one.
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 5:43:31 PM No.96153915
103927809235
103927809235
md5: ba0133512f5a1fbe64369e666aec83a1🔍
>>96152684
It is from a Nuremberg Chronicle, anon. Made in 1493. Men used to imagine female warriors in middle-ages too. It is among the most traditionalist male fantasies ever and inherently belongs in western fantasy fiction.
Pic related is another example, it is from Le Secret De L'histoire Naturelle from the 15th century.
Replies: >>96157885
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 9:31:06 PM No.96155684
Artesia-comic-84
Artesia-comic-84
md5: e7b70b9c3fb22406df4bef154dd00dab🔍
>>96144487
a man of taste and culture
Anonymous
7/22/2025, 11:27:31 PM No.96156400
>>96152684
You are a fucking loser lmao
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 1:12:09 AM No.96157152
1723518090694
1723518090694
md5: 38fc05ad77be0e30ddcfb43fac3490c8🔍
>>96152684
How are some people still to dumb to differentiate between AI and real art?
Replies: >>96157805
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 2:58:32 AM No.96157805
likepottery
likepottery
md5: 871da5810563efd4d22dcce89807da1d🔍
>>96157152
He isn't, he's just shitposting.
Replies: >>96157930
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 3:11:35 AM No.96157885
>>96153915
Looks like they also fantasized about female orc trumpeters, as well.
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 3:20:13 AM No.96157930
1733098132484
1733098132484
md5: 92b9176dde529919bf912179a8069026🔍
>>96157805
That doesn't make him any less of a retard.
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 5:28:34 AM No.96158649
>>96136146 (OP)
same as men, i dont give a fuck about those details
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 10:55:25 PM No.96163738
>>96142885
why are you so invested in these threads?
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 11:04:15 PM No.96163797
>>96152289
heterosexual men do indeed
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 11:05:55 PM No.96163809
>bumping after 17 hours
>accusing people of being overly invested in the thread
Anonymous
7/23/2025, 11:50:16 PM No.96164124
>>96142668
What others?