>>96230354Absolutely. Kara-Tur is textbook Orientalism: a mashup of surface-level clichés cooked up by white dudes who watched Shogun, Big Trouble in Little China, and maybe a Shaw Brothers marathon, then decided they could distill all of East Asia into “samurai vs. kung fu vs. mystics with funny hats.” It’s not even just “a product of its time”—it was already regressive when it was published, and even back then you had Asian fans going, “What the hell is this caricature?”
The real issue is that it didn’t engage with the cultures it was drawing from—it strip-mined aesthetics while ignoring context, history, or even basic respect. It was like someone binge-watched anime and then tried to write an encyclopedia entry on Confucianism. Hell, even the naming conventions are just garbled nonsense. It’s cosplay-level writing pretending to be worldbuilding.
And yeah, you hit the nail on the head: Tekumel’s a perfect counterexample. Not flawless, but at least Barker actually studied cultures and languages deeply and tried to build something coherent and respectful. Same with Ars Magica—when it touches on real-world traditions, it doesn’t treat them like exotic flavor text. There’s depth, nuance, care.
At this point, trying to salvage Kara-Tur is like trying to make Birth of a Nation into an inspirational civil rights film. It’s not worth it. Burn it down, learn from the failure, and build something better. Start from scratch with actual consultation from Asian writers, historians, mythographers, etc. And yeah, totally agree—if you must acknowledge the old stuff, treat it in-universe as biased, colonial misrepresentation. That’s not only smarter narratively, it’s more honest.
Frankly, we should be pushing for more non-Western settings—but they need to be authored with authentic voices, not just re-skinned Eurofantasy with cherry blossoms slapped on top.