← Home ← Back to /tg/

Thread 96367936

77 posts 18 images /tg/
Anonymous No.96367936 >>96367994 >>96368032 >>96368169 >>96368672 >>96369205 >>96369539 >>96369806 >>96370520 >>96371857 >>96372387 >>96374433 >>96374706 >>96374904 >>96375063
At times i think to myself how stupid shit like this looks.
And i know it's an exaggeration but at the same time DND feels like its a platform for Tumbril crowd to RP their fantasy self insert OCs in.
And then i think is this actually the main demographic of DND now?
Do i have the right to complain if people who buy DND stuff nowadays are exclusively the tumblir crowd.
Anonymous No.96367994 >>96369345
>>96367936 (OP)
The 2024 gay pride image specifically designed to cater to the pride community for June of that year?

Yeah that’s a targeted image designed for a demographic. Why are you looking for old pride images of d&d? You a gay guy?
Anonymous No.96368032 >>96368066 >>96368403 >>96368440 >>96368647 >>96370756
>>96367936 (OP)
You have the "right" to complain about anything you please, anon. But no one is ever going to care. Those of us who grew up playing D&D in the 80s and 90s were bullied to shit for being outcasts, with "gay" and "fag" being the most common insults. So most of us feel just fine about our hobby being welcoming and inclusive.
Anonymous No.96368066 >>96368109
>>96368032
Hey, do me a favor. Speak for yourself, don't try to speak for others, or better yet, just shut the fuck up. Faggot.
Anonymous No.96368109 >>96368149
>>96368066
Sorry that reality is intruding on your safe space, anon. It's gonna keep doing that.
Anonymous No.96368149 >>96368180 >>96369392
>>96368109
You thinking like that is how you got Trump elected.
Seriously though. Stick to just saying your own opinions; don't try to put your words in other people's mouths. Because, your grasp on "reality' is far from firm.
Anonymous No.96368169 >>96369840
>>96367936 (OP)
Here's how I think of it.

This image will not happen in a D&D session. It will not happen in mine, in yours, or in anyone else's. It has never happened and never will.
If this is the case, why are we using it to represent what D&D is like? It is not a picture of D&D.
Anonymous No.96368180 >>96369107
>>96368149
>Nuh-uh!
>Muh identity politics!
Great counter-point, anon. Really inspiring.
Anonymous No.96368403 >>96368416
>>96368032
Please fuck off back to wherever you came from, holy shit.
Anonymous No.96368416 >>96368458
>>96368403
Suggestion: do something positive with your life, rather than clinging to an identity defined by how much you hate people and things.
Anonymous No.96368440 >>96370520
>>96368032
People are more openly hating gays these days than any amount of hatred I ever saw before they got their wishes and gay marriage was legalized. Go back in the closet and don't come out, it's better for you.
Anonymous No.96368458 >>96368502 >>96368503
>>96368416
By that logic, why be gay? All you faggots ever do is hate on straight people
Anonymous No.96368502
>>96368458
You’re a guy looking for pictures of gay people in dungeons and dragons, saving them to your computer to look at in the future, then sharing it with your friends online nearly a year later .

You gay as hell bro
Anonymous No.96368503
>>96368458
Anon I don't even hate you. :)
Anonymous No.96368647
>>96368032
Wonderful ragebaiting sir
Anonymous No.96368672
>>96367936 (OP)
>And i know it's an exaggeration but at the same time DND feels like its a platform for Tumbril crowd to RP their fantasy self insert OCs in
You mean reddit. Even tumblr hates D&D.
Anonymous No.96369107 >>96369180
>>96368180
Your "allies" will kick you out of your hobby, no matter how nice you are, like they always do you smarmy piece of dog shit.
Anonymous No.96369180
>>96369107
I've been playing D&D since 1989, anon. There's no one to "kick me out of" anything. They're books. Read 'em. Play a game. Or read different ones and play that game, instead. But stop getting mad about your identity politics on the internet. It's just so banal.
Anonymous No.96369205 >>96369381 >>96374462
>>96367936 (OP)
Do you retards ever get bothered by the fact that you have to handpick these images and take them out of their original context to pretend like they represent "what D&D is now"?

This image is not in any D&D book ever published. It was made for merch that Wizards sold for Pride 2024. All the profits went/go to a gay charity (The Trevor Project). No shit it has a bunch of fags and colors.
Anonymous No.96369345 >>96369391
>>96367994
Where are the advertising and product campaigns to cater to every other "community" on every one of their special months/days?
Anonymous No.96369381 >>96369391
>>96369205
Do you ever get tired of having WotC's dick in your throat?
Anonymous No.96369391 >>96369686
>>96369345
You don't see them because these are cherrypicked to mindfuck you, and you don't enjoy getting riled up by other groups as much, but here's a couple:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8EGUeCEtDQ <- Official D&D channel, "#BlackAF"

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/himmy-t-b047161a1_when-dd-meets-japan-were-thrilled-to-ugcPost-7355578139823001601-1tIW/ <- Japan

>>96369381
No, since I don't play or pay for their shit products and can say confidently 5e is the worst TTRPG I have ever had the misfortune of playing. However, my brain functions at a level above that of an infant so I do not enjoy being deceived and manipulated by those who try to pretend like OP pic is more than what it is.
Anonymous No.96369392
>>96368149
>You thinking like that is how you got Trump elected.
He got elected because the prices were up and now the prices are still up
Anonymous No.96369539
>>96367936 (OP)
Long time fans have every right to complain about the direction the franchise they dedicated much of their lives too. Without the original players it never would have gotten this far to start with. I frankly have a lot to say about a lot of it too. But frankly I'd also suggest that past a certain point it's just not worth caring about. I still have my old editions and I'm content to play those or a different game. Feel free to hate but find something else to like.
Anonymous No.96369612
What annoys me isn't the idea of gayness but the prevalence of absolute faggotry. Which may not seem like it but it is a important distinction. Because for whatever reason gays these days can't ever just simply exist. Nobody is ever JUST gay and that's it. Nobody ever just wants to rescue a prince instead of a princess. OP image is a prime example. This isn't fantasy. Oh they're dressed up as such but they're not. It's just a gay pride parade where everyone has nothing to say about how much a giga queer they are. The fantasy element should always be the primary focus. And this isn't say you should hide it or anything but what if instead of the OP image you instead had an image of a hero saving their [insert loved one] here from some kind of peril. Or they expressed it front of a slain dragon. Or if want something more picturesque and quite do it front of an impossible scenery, a world with three moons cast over a desert wasteland and towering castle walls. Instead we get a world of warcraft pride parade. Because this is the problem. It's boring.
Anonymous No.96369686 >>96369820 >>96375947
>>96369391
>However, my brain functions at a level above that of an infant so I do not enjoy being deceived and manipulated by those who try to pretend like OP pic is more than what it is.
How is WotC's overt, constant, and unambiguous promotion of faggotry anything less than what it has been for over a decade now?
Anonymous No.96369806 >>96371071 >>96374483
>>96367936 (OP)
You'd prefer it looks like this?
Anonymous No.96369820 >>96369850
>>96369686
Because people pretend like it is something printed into every book when it's confined to a single soc media post online.
Anonymous No.96369833
Why would anyone buy D&D stuff nowadays? Their output is so ass it's not even worth stealing.
Anonymous No.96369840
>>96368169
I'm going to add this exact scene to my next D&D session just to prove you wrong.
Anonymous No.96369850 >>96370692
>>96369820
I feel like you are exaggerating to convince yourself that you have a solid argument. It's not in every book and no one has implied that it is. That does not mean that WotC products are devoid of pozz.
Anonymous No.96370146 >>96370459
Supporting gay characters is hardly stupid. It's... trite? Obvious? But not anymore stupid than, I don't know, having a blockbuster about the military being on the right side in your usual battle against evil.

That being said this pic is pretty terrible, and not for the two guys. Why the fuck is there a... good? Beholder with heart-shaped pupils? Aren't those supposed to be fucking evil mastermind monsters 99.999999999%? THIS is what I don't get with this style of promotion, it's very detached from what the game is about, which is well, killing monsters. By all means do a piece about adventurers celebrating, even if too bright like this, but I can't get the "everyone gets along" idea, it looks like a parody.

Well, this and the bard (?) imitating 70s rock band on stage. You don't have an amplifier nor an electric guitar, girl.

Kinda like the kobolds tough.
Anonymous No.96370459 >>96370560
>>96370146
Nothing is allowed to be pure evil anymore. Everything is just differently coded.
Anonymous No.96370520 >>96374504
>>96367936 (OP)
As a gay man i want it on record that the only D&D book ive ever owned was for 4e and it was stolen

>>96368440
>People are more openly hating gays these days than any amount of hatred I ever saw before
Bro my city used to be the world capital for gay bashing. We went from "get punched in the head and die" to "marriage equality" within my lifetime, i literally could not care less that bitter cunts are being loud on the internet
Anonymous No.96370522 >>96374508
>kvetching about homos in dnd thread #28937412847923471298471234
Why don't you play something better and not spend your life begging a company to cater to your tastes? I swear you faggots think TTRPGs are like video games where you can't edit out the t hings you don't like. Sad!
Anonymous No.96370560 >>96370787
>>96370459

I don't even care about uh, orcish moral relativism, is just that DND seems like possibly the worst system to implement the idea that what you are wantonly killing for gold and moral reasons might be actually not that evil at all.

(I mean, I can theoretically concede that the monster for the PCs might or not be "evil" and so right to exterminate, but fucking beholders? DND history aside, they... are lawful evil in the manual)
Anonymous No.96370672 >>96370702 >>96374523
It's strange and disheartening to see so many people across all of /tg/ caustically and angrily insisting what's put before their eyes is not at all what it looks like.

I understand being tired of faggots complaining about faggots, but why pretend that what's obviously happening isn't happening?
Anonymous No.96370692 >>96370931 >>96371156 >>96374535
>>96369850
>pozz
fucking tourists are so fucking gay.
Anonymous No.96370702
>>96370672
>Generic culture war shit
Anonymous No.96370756
>>96368032
Unironically based response to an obvious bait thread.
Anonymous No.96370787 >>96370875 >>96370896 >>96374548
>>96370560
Theres a neutral good demon in averness and a goblin you're not supposed to kill in phandelver. Strahd is full of non-hostile monsters that are typically evil alligned, exceptions to the rule are everywhere

Actually i think its an interesting quirk of allignments in general- if you have objective moral allignments the only interesting thing you can do with it in a story is subvert it.
Is a beholder supposed to be good? No. But if you come across an evil beholder is its evilness actually interesting? The "truer" the beholder the more it loses its character and degenerates to a stat block
Anonymous No.96370875 >>96371708
>>96370787
It's more that Beholders in text tend to be aggressive, xenophobic, and rather insane by default, so it takes much more to explain away how a beholder can be "good" than it does for it to be "evil". Not saying a table can't do it, but it's more of an uphill battle than for most other monster species.
Anonymous No.96370896 >>96370903 >>96371708
>>96370787

Kinda gay if there's not a good reason for them to clearly be so (and PCs to get it before using their swords).

A beholder being evil is... like a fox wanting to kill chickens. You, the farmer, don't question that, you take measures to stop it if there is not the clearest suggestion that it's not a menace.
Anonymous No.96370903
>>96370896

(also, actually having generically evil monsters being queer-friendly kinda sends the wrong message, doesn't it?)
Anonymous No.96370931
>>96370692
>fucking tourists are so fucking gay.
"Nooooo they've got a term for faggotry in tabletop games, ugh."
Anonymous No.96370962 >>96374671 >>96374678
Play games you like. Don't play games you hate. We're getting too old to bicker about pronouns when nobody can afford rent and your job's getting outsourced to Panjesh. Bitching about this stuff is how these people thrive. It's the only currency they're still rich in. Ignore them. Just ignore the faggotry and play something that brings you joy. DnD hasn't been your system for over a decade now. Whining about all the pozz in it when we went through an entire, "hehe so whacky" phase with Rick and Morty is pathetic. The game's for the lowest common denominator and it's just not cool.

Play Pendragon. Play Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay 4e. Play Legend of the Five Rings. Play Trespasser. Play Hackmaster. Play Conan 2d20. Play something other than DnD.
Anonymous No.96370965 >>96374696
>oh no, gay people play the same game as me
Anonymous No.96371071
>>96369806
...that.... is actually an improvement.
it seems more relevant and less contrived.
it has 0.8 percent more soul.
Anonymous No.96371156
>>96370692
That term is 10 years old, zoomzoom.
Anonymous No.96371708 >>96374718
>>96370875
Lets be real, Its there because of brand recognition. I just think its interesting that rigid allignment is contradicted by most published modules

>>96370896
I think you're assuming an ultra-hardline position and environment that usually doesnt exist. Take averness for example. Its wall to wall with evil creatures, but the vast majority are willing to negotiate. Over the course of the campaign a diplomatic neutral character will achieve more good than a homocidal LG character who's too busy actively purging their own allies.

Allignment isnt perscriptive after all.
Anonymous No.96371802
The problem is, that like it or not DnD does represent the face of the whole industry. And because of this, whatever DnD does do does in some way reflect on the hobby as a whole. You can say go play another game or another edition, and yes people should if they don't like the current one but DnD is the headliner and what people expect out of this is going to change what they expect out of other games and its going to change how outsiders look in.
Anonymous No.96371857
>>96367936 (OP)
>And i know it's an exaggeration but at the same time DND feels like its a platform for Tumbril crowd to RP their fantasy self insert OCs in.
This is how I know you've only interacted with these people via neckbeardia videos and r/greentext posts, but I'm also glad that you're self aware about it. One of my best memories in this hobby was a 5e game where there was one girl with blue hair. People knew what their characters were for and played accordingly. A good game can come from anywhere and I hope you transition into becoming a yesgames.
Anonymous No.96372387 >>96372434 >>96372755 >>96374470
>>96367936 (OP)
it's funny how this gay leather daddy art is somehow less gay than the image created by fujoshits in the op
Anonymous No.96372434
>>96372387
That just looks like a Nitzer Ebb show.
Anonymous No.96372755
>>96372387
the overton window has shifted
the straight men are now gay
the gays are now transvestites
the transvestites are now women
the women are now straight men
Anonymous No.96374433
>>96367936 (OP)
You'll be dead soon.
Anonymous No.96374462
>>96369205
Yes, the whole point is that the morally proper thing for wotc to do is produce art of fags and troons being slaughtered. Try to keep up.
Anonymous No.96374470
>>96372387
no, anon. That's very, very gay as well.
Anonymous No.96374483
>>96369806
Yes.
Anonymous No.96374504 >>96375704
>>96370520
then your city was better in the past.
Anonymous No.96374508 >>96375704
>>96370522
Why don't you get genocided?
Anonymous No.96374523 >>96375704 >>96375704
>>96370672
it's not happening and it's good that it is sweetie :)
Anonymous No.96374535 >>96375704
>>96370692
then you should fit right in with them, pozzed FAGGOT
Anonymous No.96374548
>>96370787
No, the interesting thing you do with alignments is kill evil monsters to protect the morally righteous noble kingdom you stupid fucking communist
Anonymous No.96374671
>>96370962
Speak for yourself. My house is nearly paid off and my job can't be outsourced.
Anonymous No.96374678 >>96375704
>>96370962
nice false flag btw, tranny
Anonymous No.96374696
>>96370965
Yeah. You're not welcome.
Anonymous No.96374706 >>96374736
>>96367936 (OP)
It may look stupid to you, but the vast majority of /tg/, support this. They are progressives
Anonymous No.96374718
>>96371708
Alignment is prescriptive.
Anonymous No.96374736
>>96374706
Wrong.
Anonymous No.96374904
>>96367936 (OP)
D&D has been fagslop for years, play a better game already.
Anonymous No.96375063 >>96375603 >>96375692
>>96367936 (OP)
You types are always the ones that blame fags and fujos for your market being small. Guess what, it's not their job to support your interest, that's your job. Stop crying like a bitch about pandering and blaming them for the fact that other people's buying power outpaces yours and don't care about your shit.
Anonymous No.96375603 >>96375704
>>96375063
fags don't buy or play games nice try false flagging communist troon
Anonymous No.96375692 >>96376080
>>96375063
They don't pander to fags because fags are a loyal market. They pander to fags in spite of the damage it does to their reputation because they are convinced that, over a long enough span of time, their virtue signalling and dedication to an ill-defined "greater good" (taking the form of hiring some faggot off bluesky to draw the gayest shit anyone has ever seen) will pay dividends that will make up for the short-term, year to year losses they face with products that aren't crossovers with more successful IPs, like Final Fantasy, which have never done this pride parade clownshit routine.
Anonymous No.96375704
>>96374504
>>96374508
>>96374523
>>96374523
>>96374535
>>96374678
>>96375603
All posted by the same person.
Anonymous No.96375947
>>96369686
Everyone in that picture has since been fired from WotC as of Dec 2024. It was like an early Christmas present from our president, Donald Trump
Anonymous No.96376080
>>96375692
God you people are just so tiresome with your identity-politics paranoia.

These are public corporations. Public corporations are owned by investment groups who care about one thing, and one thing only: quarterly profits. The people in charge are financial analysts who give zero fucks about what a product is, ethics, social justice or whatever the hell else you've deluded yourself into believing is some grand conspiracy. They make decisions for money.