>>96394591
>>most underated show is Picard or Voyager discovery is actually based SNW is also based
>>I'm worried I'll get it wrong
Hey man, relax, no need to worry about getting it wrong. Hanging out with people like that says they wouldn't know wrong if it came up and bit them on the rear. They don't want to play Star Trek, they want nutrek. Worse visuals, recycled names, none of what made Trek good.
For years Voyager was the worst Trek-like show with a C grade crew at best where TOS and TNG and DSN were A grade. Picard lacks something even as basic as a coherent plot line or characters and they assassinated the greatness that was Capt. Picard. Maybe you could try watching the third series. You might as well shoot yourself rather than try to watch Discovery. That mutineering war-criming bitch should have been court-martialled. The death penalty was an option in the Federation and so the first episode should have ended with her execution. Brave New Worlds throws out almost all semblance Star Trek and instead is a soap opera made of high schoolers ruled by teenage emotions not by a sense of duty and the desire to explore strange new worlds, despite that being in the title. Like Voyager, you've got C grade crew despite Pike being A grade in TOS.
>the 2 new movies
2? Into Darkness and Beyond? Luckily you missed the 2009 film. The last film was tolerable, the first two were vapid and hollow incoherent messes where the "characters" were caricatures of the characters they were based on. Khan in particular was a mess. There was absolutely no reason to call that character Khan other than
>Hey, that's a word I know
Since what they want is nutrek, you can throw the worst PBTA at them and they'll suck it up like Luke swallows the blue milk.
The two who show good taste and intelligence, keep them and play Last Unicorn Game either the TOS or TNG since it did both eras well. With genuine Star Trek you can't easily hybridise the two eras unless you know them well.
