Thread 96465333

"Crisis on Infinite Threads" Edition

>Bans
https://magic.wizards.com/en/news/announcements/banned-and-restricted-june-30-2025

>News
The 2025 MagicCon and Pro Tour Schedule:
https://www.magic.gg/news/the-2025-magiccon-and-pro-tour-schedule

>Metagame Mentor: The Winners and Losers from Standard's 2025 Rotation
https://www.magic.gg/news/metagame-mentor-the-winners-and-losers-from-standards-2025-rotation

>Spoilers
http://www.magicspoiler.com/
https://mythicspoiler.com/

CONSTRUCTED RESOURCES
>Current meta, complete with deck lists
https://www.mtgtop8.com/
https://www.mtggoldfish.com/metagame/
>Build and share casual decks
https://deckstats.net/
https://tappedout.net/

CUBE RESOURCES
>Build and share Cubes
https://cubecobra.com/landing

CARD RESOURCES
>Search engines
https://scryfall.com/
https://mtg.wtf/
>Proxy a deck or a cube for cheap
https://www.makeplayingcards.com/
https://pastebin.com/9Xj1xLdM
>Play online for free
https://untap.in/
https://dr4ft.info/

>What is EDH?
https://vocaroo.com/1ihc21gJLBh1

>WotC's War Crimes
https://pastebin.com/JRYDiAjq (OLD)
https://pastebin.com/nEcKGAys (NEW)

>Previously
>>96365430

>TQ
How many /mtg/ Generals are allowed in the Spiderverse?

>>96465333 (OP)
>333

>TQ
Some would say the possible number of real /mtg/ Generals is... infinite.

>How many /mtg/ Generals are allowed in the Spiderverse?
yes

this set sucks

I wouldn't mind UB if it was tastefully done...not like this set.

>>96465393
But the threads are fantastic, which one is the real thread?

Niggers Niggers Niggers

>>96465333 (OP)
Dang, didn't make the OP. nice trips tho

GET THIS FUCKING THREAD SPLITTER OFF ME

>>96465401
I feel like we should have a full on shitshow ub for every few reasonable ones, like if we got WH fantasy and TES followed by El Chapulin Colorado
I would prefer if they were once a year or like every eight months so we'd only occasionally have multiples though

>>96465393
Only two OM1 cards have been revealed so far.

>>96465435
I thought they showed off ur-spider (and some guy) too though

>>96465445
Ur-spider and the UW Spider-punk. Two cards.

>>96465461
They also showed off The Terminus Stone (Soul Stone expy), which makes it three cards.

>>96465445
That's what I just said!
>>96465461
Although the Terminus Stone also, so three.

6 sets, 6 threads, 6th color!

>>96465580
This is what happens when shills break the rules with no consequences, we will break them right back to express our displeasure with SPOODERMAN

>>96465547
They really dont like AI

>>96465430
I think you just might get your wish anon, SPOODERMAN looks like an outright disaster

>>96465580
/ccg/

>>96465476
I was gaffing about urspider including a human in the art for the typing

>>96465826
I forgot the sacrifice. It's not like I was trying to fix Black Lotus.

the good news is that horny is back
the bad news is that you'll be having this conversation for the rest of time
>I cast spiderman
>which one?
>uhhh

This needs to be made standard legal

>>96465962
Read the card

>>96466049
Why?

>>96466062
Fuck you that's why.

>>96466060
>it's uh the black blue spiderman
>the one that scry's?
>no, this one's a clone
>oh
forever and ever and ever until the end of time

>>96466081
>>it's uh the black blue spiderman
pray to god you're never with a new player who thinks that describes the costume rather than the card itself

>>96466432
>a new player
luckily SPOODERMAN is bringing in exactly zero new players

>>96466067
I'm here for commentary this real

>no moebius secret lair like frank frazetta got
>instead we get a single spiderman card with his art on it
this is like a damn monkey's paw situation for me. FUCK.

>>96465580
I'm surprised we haven't gotten a gold "can only be paid for with mana that could have been mana of any color" type mana symbol yet, like how we got butthole mana for "exclusively colorless"

>>96465826
mana burn hasn't been a thing for years anon, wtf are you doing?

>>96470539
would require an entire reworking of the rules with tons of errata OR making it a lame, parasitic mechanic. it would start by adding in "rainbow mana", a type of mana that can be spent as any colour. then, they would either errata all cards like city of brass and mana confluence to produce rainbow mana (which then makes those cards worse when it comes to interacting with cards like omnath, locus of mana for example or cards that care about mana of specific colours being spent on them) OR they make a bunch of NEW versions of mana confluence/city of brass that add rainbow mana specifically for this "can only be paid for with mana that could have been mana of any color" idea that you have. the juice isn't worth the squeeze, boyo.

>>96470546
Maybe not but it didn't stop them from doing butthole mana and that was a boondoggle too

>>96470549
far less obtrusive than adding something like rainbow mana. colourless mana already existed in the game. all they really did was make a distinction between "generic costs" and "colourless mana". before, generic costs and colourless mana generation used the same symbols, but they changed it so that there was specific use cases for colourless mana while still keeping generic costs as a thing. the distinction was actually a great thing in my opinion. generic costs can be paid by any type of mana, colourless mana is just another specific type of mana like any of the colours.

>>96470542
Playing with the concept of purple mana to make it work differently.

>>96465333 (OP)
I'm laughing a little too hard at this Magic the Gathering card.

>>96472188
Crisis on Infinite Threads, Day II

>>96470561
>rainbow mana
Wizards is already working on this