>>96514257
>but if they make a video about liking a video game they probably passably understand a lot of what's good about that game from a certain position of "getting it".
I actually do have a couple, some of them are older folks from the scene but my experience is they have a habit of distorting reality to re-frame it into what they want.
see Hbomb's darksouls 2 video.
Dan olsen on TGWTG
That one guy who said that horror is inherently anti-right wing.
and that other guywho spoke of modern art but didn't really understand it.
If i had time i'd bring up IS and go through my issues with his work.
any of the debate bros off the dome.
Here's the conclusion i want, i'm going to work backwards from that and then build a story whilst doing so.
I don't disagree that shad's shit but i think a little knowledge is dangerous knowing the work and twisting it to your benefits i think fucks conversation more broadly.
but i also have a particular dislike for the "media literacy" people because they're artsy but not artists if you understand me.
shad's not an artist, bro has stupid opinions on AI but that's fine. dude's not trying to be
but when you get these people in their fucking disco colours, costumes and making a drama class production for an essay where you say "cartoon/game/etc] is cool and smart and anti capitalism and here's why" is gay as site before you even get to the fact that they're twisting the facts to provide their preferred interpretation on art.
it's worse that these people pretend, shad's an enemy outside, they're aids.