← Home ← Back to /tg/

Thread 96744160

16 posts 8 images /tg/
Anonymous No.96744160 >>96744293 >>96745727 >>96747755 >>96748121
How is the new edition?
Is it at least playable?
I remember original being only marginally better than f.a.t.a.l. gameplay wise...
Anonymous No.96744171
The new version is extremely playable. The old version is very playable.
I have no idea what made you struggle with it.
It's just basic d&d with a better economic framework.
It's a game system designed for 12 year olds, how do you struggle??
Anonymous No.96744293 >>96744366 >>96744858 >>96745426 >>96745532 >>96747582
>>96744160 (OP)
>woman warrior on the cover art
let me save you the time
it's woke trash
Anonymous No.96744366 >>96744604
>>96744293
Why are you even in /tg/?
Woman on cover is literally classic of tabletop
Anonymous No.96744604 >>96745426
>>96744366
ywnbaw
kys tranny
Anonymous No.96744858 >>96745418
>>96744293
You should leave /tg/ as you are clearly too stupid to play tabletop games
Anonymous No.96745418 >>96745453
>>96744858
fuck off libtard soiboi
Anonymous No.96745426
>>96744293
>>96744604
Saaar
Anonymous No.96745453
>>96745418
No u, retarded nogames /pol/tard.
Anonymous No.96745532 >>96746564
>>96744293
Even Varg's new system has an armed human (?) female on a cover.
Anonymous No.96745727
>>96744160 (OP)
>How is the new edition?
Same same, but different, but still same
>Is it at least playable?
Sure, the core elements work. The problem is that this is still ACKS, so it working =/= being good
>I remember original being only marginally better
This is marginally better than original. It's still extremely bloated and very poorly edited at the same time. It could easily drop third of the page count without any impact on the mechanics.
Macris badly needs an editor

All in all, it's a thoroughly average and milquetoast 5/10 heartbreaker that tries to appeal both to normalfags and OSR crowd at once, failing to be good for either. But at this point, it doesn't matter, ACKS own fandom is cult-like, so it's a product for the acolytes.
Anonymous No.96746564 >>96747030
>>96745532
he is literally the "I know those sjws are pretty bad but you know who is also bad..." meme ever since he did his time
ps
libtards coping hard on their woke game
Anonymous No.96747030
>>96746564
Or maybe people like you are just retarded.
Anonymous No.96747582
>>96744293
... are you seriously this starved for attention?
Anonymous No.96747755
>>96744160 (OP)
it's no masterpiece
Anonymous No.96748121
>>96744160 (OP)
Meh/10.
It's not bad. It's not good. It's not even average.
It's simply meh