I don’t care for fantasy after 5th edition. I can appreciate the concepts Aos has. I can’t appreciate gw though. If they weren’t so ass about its copy right I’d love to make some fan content for it.
>>96903238
anon you dont even have to post the old metals, post the bretonian foot knights instead. quite possibly the worst battleline unit to grace the warhammer ip.
>>96901290 (OP)
AoS is really great. captured me in a way WHFB never did. I don't have any opinion about TOW, but I do love Beastmen. Company is retarded for taking them off the AoS menu
>>96901290 (OP)
No debate at all when you offer either a shit sandwich or a kick in the nuts. How about I decline both and instead continue to play with better and cheaper figures from other manufacturers, using better game systems than those two childish abortions?
>>96903238
I actually like both old garbage AND new garbage. I dont think that either TOW or 4e AoS are particularly great. TOW is mechanically undercooked and AoS has too little content for each faction.
The both aren't very good. TOW managed be a worse version of WHFB and Age of Sigmar is a bland and directionless game with huge power scale he-man type models.
>>96901290 (OP)
Both are good in their niches, only thing common between them is branding and both being fantasy games
But my vote goes to AoS, it has Big Pig, I am yet to see one in Fantasy
>>96901290 (OP)
Both are trash, the difference is AoS players acept it; meanwhile TOW players are delusional and tryhard convincing himself that their game is good and has a big playerbase.