>>11454411
the base game has enough content to last a long time even without a live service, and definitely more content than the Paradise will ever get
>>11454421
alright.
>90s nostalgia pandering
literal buzzwords. Even if you were referring to the roaster, the game has a good amount of representation from every tamagotchi generation
>FOMO shit
the only things you could be missing out on are the tama arena rewards which nobody gives a shit about, and it's not like there's an encyclopedia with a checklist or anything like that so why do you care
>online
it's serviceable, I'm sorry you set yourself up for disappointment but they never meant it to be anything other than what they delivered, and it's not even that awful, although they definitely could have improved upon it
>everything is trivialized
so like every other virtual pet ever aside from maybe the ocean one? If anything it actually makes it hard to get care mistakes, so it should be a good thing if we go by your criticism
>dogshit minigames
that's subjective, dance being the only objectively bad one. I personally like some of the dlc minigames, like the very berry land one
>cosmetics
yes? It's not the first time they did it, and they're cute at best and 100% optional at worst
>personalities
again, they're inoffensive and subjective, I like seeing the reactions the same tama can have when their personality is different, why would you hate it so much? They didn't cut down on development time for such a basic function man
>tablets
what? The phone thing?
>DoorDash
so you're just complaining about buying food
The points I didn't address I agree with, but it's insane how angry the Uni gets you. It's not even my favorite device, hell I like the Connection more, but I just don't get this weird hate for it when it's not worse than most other virtual pets that got released at the same price tag