>>11491932
I'll reiterate, if Todd increasing the price a few dollars is enough to deter you, then you didn't want the toy that much anyway and you're better off just not getting it. I don't know why everyone got so butt flustered about that.
>>11491924
>Because you're straight up dumb.
Or maybe, I make enough money that $50 just isn't a lot to me. I'm not even what I consider rich, but the way some of you act about a $4 price increase makes me think you're at poverty level.
>You acting like quality ain't a huge problem with McFarlane figures isn't going to make the issue disappear
I don't even buy McFarlane figures since, as you said, the quality isn't there. Not detracting anyone who does, but see what I said above.
>What does that even have to do with anything? A plumbing issue isn't a hobby, you fucking moron
It was a several hundred dollar expense I didn't foresee needing to pay. I'm just saying, the price differences in these toys we're discussing is literally chump change to anyone with an actual salary.
> it's clear as day that you're ignorant and simply too unintelligent to form a coherent thought worthy of a discussion. If most people here were living with their parents, they wouldn't be bitching about the prices of these figures. The bitching is probably more due to the fact that people already have bills to pay and now figures are getting more expensive. Grow up
The assumption I made, that you all seemingly fail to grasp, is that they live with their parents because they don't have any money. If they did, they wouldn't be sobbing about a less than $20 price difference. I'm not advocating to pay scalpers, but I'm just pointing out the way some of you act over $5 is unreal, and if you're that hard on for cash, you probably shouldn't be wasting it on toys. Back when I was broke I wasn't spending money on toys or vidya, or anything like that. I only started buying stuff when I got a job that could pay all my bills, and pay for my hobbies.