Thread 11584543

>"this toy/hobby/subculture is dying, why?"
>look inside
>overpriced
>nostalgia baiting older generations
>nothing provided to newer generations aside from low effort slop
it's happening everywhere, Lego, Mattel, Hasbro, even the toy train companies seem to care more about pandering to manchildren and resellers than they do actually making toys for freaking children

>>11584543 (OP)
>>11584543 (OP)
Newer generations collect Labubu, Pokemon, and various anime figures. That's what western toy-makers have to deal with.

>>11584543 (OP)
children don't like toys anymore how many times do we have to tell you this

>>11584543 (OP)
There really are no real toy stores any longer. The few that are around are independent places that mostly stick to funkos and hot wheels, which some really random import stuff from Korea and China. But no big named franchises or tie-ins at all.

Meanwhile the bigger American companies keep remaking, re-remaking, and re-re-remaking the same shit from the 80s to sell to the exact same group of people for the last 40 years. Great! More He-Man, Ghostbusters, and TMNT toys. Either the exact same molds from 1987, or a slight update of the 1987 figure but with a few extra joints!!!


No shit kids aren't collecting a goddamn thing. no one is making anything for them and retards around here are falling back on
>Hur durr, kids don't play with toys
Yeah again no shit, no one is making toys for them or has in more than a decade.

>>11584548
They only collect those things because Youtubers, influencers, and eCelebs tell them to.

>>11584591
Most of the (new) "franchises" that get created these days, can't seem to rope kids in to buy them. Even if it's stuff that should theoretically be sellable (like FNAF, Minecraft, etc) don't seem to really sell, because kids really don't seem to care about the toys for those, despite how lucrative the actual IPs are.

And the efforts to actually "revive" 80s and 90s franchises (like Ghostbusters, TMNT, etc) don't seem to land very well. Most modern revivals are at the mercy of political correctness, and the idea that weapons and fighting are offensive, so you kind of get these neutered versions what was going on in the 80s and 90s. So, it doesn't appeal to kids, and the adult collectors have no connection to the new versions, and just want the old versions.

Action figures can't beat electronic devices. Physical action figures just are not for younger generations and will eventually cease to exist. Actual kids toys will be reduced in prevalence, but continue in a small role when parents buy them.

>>11584590
>children don't like toys anymore how many times do we have to tell you this

Just because your single mother sister is a bad parent, doesnt mean this is true

>>11584609
The fuck do kids not liking toys have to do with how his sister raises her children?

>>11584543 (OP)
Couple things going on

1. Death of cable and animation blocks. Kids used to watch a block of animation with ads. At their worst, the ads would be nothing but toys, candy, and good. This was around 85 at its peak. That kind of advertising was phased out but the animation blocks remained. The magic price to enter most of these cartoon worlds was $5. Sure, the bigger toys were 15, 25, 35 and so on. But most shows had popular characters you could get for $5. Heman, all your transformers minibots, insecticons, combiner limbs, tmnt, real ghostbusters, GI Joe, etc, all $5 and often less. Maybe 3.99.

What does a kid get now for $5? A 2.5 inch sonic? Those surprise balls? $20 gets you one figure when it used to get you 4!

Parents grown and moan about having to spend all this money. And who can blame them? Toy prices go up while wages have been stagnant for a while.

So what do parents do? They give them an old IPad or tv and put on free YouTube and just dont take them to buy toys.

Anons that think kids dont like toys are nuts. When I go thrifting, kids always look at the toys. All my nieces and nephews love toys.

Parents just dont take their kids to the toy area of walmart and target, and instead give them the old iPad because there is a perception that iPad are free entertainment.

It goes back to Parents, then to wages. Kids will always like toys.

>>11584618
>The fuck do kids not liking toys have to do with how his sister raises her children?

Kids no toy, only touch pad is a meme repeated by guys who's only exposure to kids and how they are raised are those with shitty mothers in their own family.

If they actually spent time around children, they'd know kids love toys when they are provided

>>11584624
Parents can't afford toys anymore unless they're rich

>>11584594
They're still shelling out cash to buy it to where Labubu now makes more money than Hasbro and Mattel do.

>>11584622
Anyway, yeah

1. Kids dont warch animation blocks because parents cant afford or so not want cable. They get free shit like YouTube. Maybe the parents spring for disneh +, but most Disney shows and movies do not have peosuct on the shelf. If they do, like the princesses, theh still move product.

2. Most entry level toys were $5. Now theh are $20 to $25 or even $30. All this while wages have remained almost the same.
2.

>>11584598
>Most of the (new) "franchises" that get created these days, can't seem to rope kids in to buy them.
that's because most new franchises are either tumblr-bait, manchild-bait, or in the vast majority of cases created by independent artists with no budget for creating their own merchandise. Like look at all the new franchises of the past ten years that are quite popular with kids nowadays
>Friday Night Funkin
>Undertale/Deltarune
>Five Nights at Freddy's
>Among Us
>Fortnite
>fucking skibidi toilet
All of these were unexpected hits, but all of them (except fortnite) were made by indie studios, and fucking skibidi toilet was originally a sfm shitpost.
>Even if it's stuff that should theoretically be sellable (like FNAF, Minecraft, etc) don't seem to really sell, because kids really don't seem to care about the toys for those, despite how lucrative the actual IPs
the problem with them is that most of their "toys" are just funkos or shitty chink merch you see sold at Target or on shitty kiosks run by third-worlders, most of them bootlegs with no playability whatsoever.
>>11584622
>Toy prices go up while wages have been stagnant for a while.
wages haven't been stagnant, the dollar itself is just becoming worthless, thank congress and the Fed for that, but all your other points are solid

>>11584631
>Labubu

Dont worry about labubu. Really, dont worry about anything adult women purchase as part of a hype train. That shir comes and goes and doesnt matter. Its essentially companies playing a slot machine. All it takes is like a mid day rv show that mom's watch and 3 famous women to hype up some random thing and then fomo makes women buy it in droves.

Then they realize it was stupid and it ends up in the garbage oe at the good will.

The unfortunate part is that everything for kids today is utter slop and the toys reflect it

>Pokemon is at least moderately still popular with somewhat reasonable toys and prices
>Fortnite is popular with kids but had like 3 failed toy lines
>Skibidi Toilet shit is shelf rotting right now
>Mr Beast figures that i don't think he even advertised are starting to be shipped off to Ollies

There's literally no other shows that are popular with kids right now that have toys except for anime shit which is mostly blind bag toys.

>>11584643
I guess to add to this, nicktoons kind of killed toys? Or at least wounded them.

Its no secret john K hated toy driven cartoons and that thought impacted how a lot of animators thought. A lot of creatives thought action figures were selling out. Not all mind you. I guess Eastman and lard loved them and saw how the toys could be a level of expression too and made all sorts of wild ones.

Anyway, yeah, it was popular after the success of nicktoons and later cartoon network to not make shows that would sell toys. And as a result, stations also stopped green lighting action cartoons. Part of the popularity of Avatar was that it was an action / adventure cartoon after going so many years without one.

There are of course exceptions like the disneh afternoon but Disney rarely made action figures and play sets for Disney afternoon or Saturday morning shows and by gooftroop, they were also leaning away from adventure series.

Also, to back up, if you're gen z or a, back in the day you would read a comic or watch a show and then go to the store and you could spend 4 to 5 $ for a character from that show and you and your friends would get together and make up your own stories with the characters. Sometimes you'd make up your own stories at home and act them out with the characters. The related tv show would play usually after school or on Saturday.

That entire eco system started to erode when Pokémon and dragon Ball Z hit and would be over entirely around 2014 when the last Saturday morning cartoon aired

The pricing, the cartoon blocks, playing with friends down the street, its been gone for 11 years now

>>11584666
>I guess to add to this, nicktoons kind of killed toys? Or at least wounded them.

Also video games.

Transformers, heman and GI Joe all hit it big after the video game bubble popped and we're able to sponge up a lot of money.

Some how, around the tail end of the 16 bit period and the start of the 32 bit era, gaming some how convinced young boys that gaming was for teenagers a d toys were for small children and man babies. Which is kind of funny given just how many gamers are man babies and how many of their favorite games are still for children or based on children's IPs.

Some how games were able to make a branding shift that toys have never been able to do, despite video games still being, we'll, games.

Games coming back from the grave during the middle of the 8 bit period pulled a lot of money out of toys. The real damage was done around the release of 32 bit games where consumers would drop toys entirely for multiple $60 purchases.

In some ways this just wise consuming. Games have stayed relatively the same price wise. In 1985, for $60 you could buy like 15 figures. So you could pretty much buy multiple seasons of characters. Thats a lot of play value. Now? 3. You can buy maybe 3. Maybe just 2.

>>11584646
Not really. I've noticed the variety of "blind box" toys offered in toy aisles. That's the fad, and it's been around for a while. The stuff's cheap and easy to make, and has a high-sellability if done right. Labubu will fizzle out, but blind-box collecting won't. That's something Hasbro and Mattel need to capitalize on instead of licensing out to others.

>>11584685
>Not really. I've noticed the variety of "blind box" toys offered in toy aisles. That's the fad, and it's been around for a while. The stuff's cheap and easy to make, and has a high-sellability if done right. Labubu will fizzle out, but blind-box collecting won't. That's something Hasbro and Mattel need to capitalize on instead of licensing out to others.

Are tou arguing with yourself?

This is a fad, but then its not a fad? Go reread what tou said

>>11584666
wasted satanic trips
>Its no secret john K hated toy driven cartoons and that thought impacted how a lot of animators thought.
who cares about John K? He was a narcissistic hack and a pedo
>And as a result, stations also stopped green lighting action cartoons. Part of the popularity of Avatar was that it was an action / adventure cartoon after going so many years without one.
what the hell are you talking about? there was a ton of Action and Adventure cartoons back in the 90s and 00s on nick and cartoon network especially, Teen titans, Ben 10, Samurai Jack, TNMT, not to mention batman and the freaking DCAU.

As someone who works with children, they seem to still like toys. But mostly it’s little collectibles and Knick knacks, oh and stuffed animals, the girls love soft things. Everyone was really into tiny ducks for a bit last year, they were like the silly bandz of today. Boys still get the nerf guns. Action figures/dolls specifically are sparse though, I rarely see any kids packing those or even talking about them.

>>11584690
Labubus are a fad, but the underlying gimmick that's driving them is not a fad. It's not hard to understand. WHEN Labubu falls, another blind-box brand will take over.

>>11584646
>Then they realize it was stupid and it ends up in the garbage oe at the good will.
Good news, everyone. It's already happening.
https://www.dailydot.com/news/goodwill-store-flooded-with-labubu-donations/

>>11584694
>what the hell are you talking about? there was a ton of Action and Adventure cartoons back in the 90s and 00s on nick and cartoon network especially, Teen titans, Ben 10, Samurai Jack, TNMT, not to mention batman and the freaking DCAU.

Im sorry you take things as a binary and dont understand spectrums and gradual declines

>>11584711
>Im sorry you take things as a binary and dont understand spectrums and gradual declines
you specifically stated that that they actively stopped greenlighting action cartoons and Avatar was the first action adventure cartoon in years, both of those things you said were objectively false. Avatar wasn't even a Saturday morning cartoon ffs, it was only on nickelodeon

>>11584721
You're free to look at rhe schedules for each year and look at the numbers of total shows dropping

>>11584543 (OP)
/toy/ is so shit right now because you have a large subset of users that have been priced out of the hobby this year and for some reason they've decided to take it out on all of us. The endless whining over $4 is outrageous to me. If a $3 price increase was enough to get you to not buy something, you didn't really even want it in the first place.

>went from pretending that Avatar was the first action show for years even though at the time ben ten and Teen Titans were highly popular because John K had a temper tantrum to "muh total numbers"
CN and Nickelodeon's decline was well after ATLA hit the picture, you delusional redditor

>>11584768
>$3-4 price increases
>meanwhile Lego casually selling sets that are $20-30 marked up purely to profit off of collectors
>pic related costs $160 and there's not a single set under $10 outside of polybags and tiny vehicles

>>11584772
Lego was a whole other animal even back in the 90s, I remember thinking Lego was overpriced compared to other toys THEN. I can only imagine how bad it is now (I don't look at Lego stuff now).

>>11584768
Dan, Marvel Legends were $20 in 2020. They are now $28 in 2025. That's not just a $3 price increase. That's $8 in 5 years. $20 to $28 a 40% price increase in 5 years. I can tell you right now I didn't get a 40% total raise over those 5 years and my metrics are close to as high as you can get -- I get raises almost double the company average. I can only imagine what people who got lower are feeling.

>>11584786
*$20 to $28 IS a 40% price increase

>>11584786
Anon $8 is literally nothing to me. I'll be alright, especially since I've been slowing down on MLs and other toy purchases as I feel my collection is as good as I am going to get it.

>>11584768
>/toy/ is so shit right now because you have a large subset of users that have been priced out of the hobby this year and for some reason they've decided to take it out on all of us. The endless whining over $4 is outrageous to me. If a $3 price increase was enough to get you to not buy something, you didn't really even want it in the first place

Its been an addiction for many for a while. It was always about the hunt and getting things cheaper than others.

Same soet of people who bitch about ankle rockers and then display 50 figures on a walmart shelf all just standing there, like trophies

>>11584769
>you delusional redditor

>everyone i dont like is neatly packaged into one group

>>11584772
Lego has been expensive for 40÷ years

>>11584794
If you weren't slowing down on MLs, you would feel that $8 as an extra $48+ per wave depending on how big the wave is.

>>11584768
At retail there's $75 spent in this picture. You can't tell me that's OK.

>>11584781
>>11584802
back in the day, by average price of the most expensive sets per theme around $90-100, and that included GOATS like the OG star destroyer, hogwarts, bat cave, and City police station. the average price of sets back then were JUST around $10-30, fifty if you wanted a big set (pic related costed only $50). Nowadays it's rare to have an entire theme to have a set under a set under $20 with sets having double (sometimes triple) the price of what the objectively should be valued, even after inflation.

diet of salt, rage bait, and spam clogged the /toy/let
we don't need a janny
we need a plumber

>>11584894
I wouldn't really call that a big set. I'm talking more like this as a big set and as you said these were approaching $100. The big sets were the only ones that gave me the wide enough freedom to build what I wanted, medium ones were very constraining and the small packs really weren't even worth getting besides as supplements.

>>11584594
Yeah, when I was a kid, there were never any trends. Fuckin' woke DEI garbage.

I've been an active user here for 10+ years and only come here now to check out the Lego/Playmobil/kids toy threads, because I have kids now. I used to collect primarily imports but having so many toys that kids can't play with is starting to feel gay and dumb. I'm getting rid of most of my shit to make room.

Even if I wanted to buy figma or whatever I can't even get that shit shipped to the states right now. For the quality of the product which I would argue has declined significantly it's just not worth it anymore.

>>11584949
The the very thing with Lego is that you could quite literally build whatever you wanted, yeah the big set was expensive but you're getting more bang for your buck back then, beside even if your didn't have the money for the big set you could've always used those smaller sets and rebuild them into whatever, especially if you had those dirt cheap brick boxes. for instance, this set from that exact same wave only costed $30...

>>11584988
by contrast, this set is what TLG considers to be worth $50 now. $50! oh and if your wondering why I chose a harry potter set and not a Castle set, it's because Castle has been dead for the past 12 years.

>>11584839
As a non-American it's even worse, I'm basically priced out because international shipping prices are also out of control.
It'd be like $150+ of my dollarydoos for those 3 little figures. I know nobody here cares about literally who countries but the point I'm making is the on top of how bad you think it is, everywhere else is even worse. The USD is very strong.

/toy/ is dying and the timer for captchas isnt helping either

>>11584591
I collect, or more correctly, I buy 1:18 or 3.75in almost exclusively of stuff that looks cool, not line exclusive just characters i like how they look or catch my attention .
If there were even half the awesome figures there are today back then when I was a kid, you bet your ass I would ask my parents to buy them for me.

So yeah kids today are fucking stupid, they hate toys so fuck them.

>>11584707
i love it when the famous person who blew it up hates it after all the femdrones overspend on it all

>>11584598
As a FNAF fan, I think the main problem was that no companies really cared to give it good toys in the first place. They treated it like a crappy kids toy without putting in the effort to make them sellable. Which is kind of ironic because if companies made them.better then they'd probably sell well. Instead Funko was the only one making figured and the figures were fairly poor. I suspect a similar sentiment is pushed to kids todays. Instead of making products of higher quality they go with bare minimum for kids and then turn to the 80s and 90s people going 'thatll be $40' for a better quality figure. Horrible long term planning, but thats how it is sadly. Short term gains, long term... did I mention short term gains?

>>11585132
I TRY to collect as best as I can, but prices are a factor. My most recent aquisition two days ago is a Black Major Cobra Commander. Yeah the shade of blue is off but I don't care. The original in good condition is simply priced out of the market for me.

And my biggest problem is I don't collect one single line to focus on, and collect multiple lines. That makes it take longer to build up any given collection as well as more costly.

>>11584594
...just like cable ads showed you your toys in previous generations

>>11584543 (OP)
Tarrifs happened

>>11586002
Bullshit. Toy prices have done nothing but creep up for a solid decade now.

>>11584772
What's the gif's problem? That Lego sets are made from bricks? Buy a model kit, not only it's more accurate to the source material, is cheaper and sturdier. I will never understand people who buy Lego sets to display them as model kits.

>>11586060
First off
>gif
it's a webm
>I will never understand people who buy Lego sets to display them as model kits.
it's meant to be a PLAY SET. a PLAY SET. as in meant to be PLAYED by KIDS. previous versions never had builds both this small and this flimsy, and for double the price. it fails at both being a model and a toy

>>11586065
Lego is overpriced nowadays but you clearly never played with Lego. No kid on this god forsaken world play with their bricks like that. Tank needs to explode anyways.

>>11586079
>build integrity doesn't matter because "muh tanks explode"
I'd like to remind everyone the previous version was bigger, sturdier, and had a side build, all for $50 less
>but you clearly never played with Lego. No kid on this god forsaken world play with their bricks like that.
people like you are the reason why the Toy industry's gone to shit, of course kids are going to play with it like that, they've been playing that for years, I've can say that personally.

>>11586103
Looking at that picture that set should cost $40 max.

>>11586103
>expecting something that's smaller and made of fewer pieces to hold up better than one that's bigger and made of more pieces
.....................................

And second, Legos have always been inherently shittier than models and actual toys.
While i understand why people want to have stylized lego kits of that shit, they're all fragile anyway, and never ever found them that playable in the first place. I have quite a few LEGO and wannabe legos sets, but i really don't expect them to hold up to any play... unless you purposely want to "destroy" them, with exposed innards and characters being blow out of chunks or fighting in the wreckage. This is quite fun.

Not that anon, btw, but i felt the need to chime in on why i avoid legos and buy model kits or buy overpriced statueshit/miniatures instead. Way more zoomable and playable, despite also being fragile.

>people like you are the reason why the Toy industry's gone to shit, of course kids are going to play with it like that
Maybe it's the opposite? Maybe kids stopped buying as many Legos because their shit did fall apart on them, because apart from bionicles, legos can't really hold up to kids treating them like an action figure or diecast car.

>dying

Nope

Just the brands you play are getting replaced

Western companies are going through a hard time competing against new comers and by their own policy.

Western toys can't make anything new when they don't own the production line and have to pay there investor dividends left and right at the same time.

There is a reason blokee can crank out dozen of lines of toys while being cheaper than anything Hasbro made.

Bandai can continue to live on its gunpla just by the fact you can't have enough zakus and they own the factory

Same should be for Lego but they intentionally removing any set that is aim at kids- Remember those mini creator set that parent can but like 3 of them for less than 20?

>>11586021
and more drastically in the past few months, which is why this thread is here yet again. and everyone is just so confused

>>11584548
>collect Labubu
Collected by childless hags in their 30s that use them to fill the gap of not having their own baby.

>Pokemon, and various anime figures
Manchildren collect these

You're not debunking his point, you're proving it.

>>11587729
>Just the brands you play are getting replaced
lol LEGO is still king, and they're growing

>>11587729
>Muh "East/west" diatribe
go back to >>>/pol/ or >>>/v/

>>11584543 (OP)
Because we’re in a recession with most on low wages, ever rising grocery/necessity prices and turborent people are either buying into “this hobby as an investment” hype or choosing to buy secondhand or just not caring about new things because they can’t afford scalpers and overpriced nostalgiabait like action figures, Lego and even stuff like Bratz dolls. Normal people are just buying super cheap stuff to give their kids when they’re not being babysat by a screen since both parents have to work full time.
The hobby lifestyle can only come back if wages go up and life necessities go down in price.

>>11591381
>wages go up
>cost of goods go up as employers need to pay their employees more
>companies take advantage of wages going up
>everything now 7-18% more expensive despite wages going up
Everyone will surely be able to afford $33.99 Marvel Legends, right?

>>11591436
If you listen to the rich tough guys here you'd think everyone on /toy/ could

>>11591436
>$33.99 Marvel Legends
Think bigger.

>>11591535
>no swivel thighs

Marvel ckûks on svicide watch.

>>11591535
All these Mafexes really just look the same. People say they reengineer every figure but I can't tell the difference. Why all the blank bodies? Why can't there be sculpted detail? I guess at least there is shading

>>11591523
To be fair, a lot of us can, but it's no longer something you can buy as a lark.

I'd buy characters just because "hey, remember that one shitty character who did something stupid? That'd be funny if i could get him into my collection to replay that one meme"
Since toys cost so much now, people are less likely to waste money on secondary and tertiary characters like that. Instead, they're opting just to buy their favorites.

>>11591657
The detail is sculpted in you dummy. The white spider isn't just painted on, it's actually sculpted. At least look into the things you bitch about before bitching about them.

>>11591681
they should've posted a picture bigger than 40kb and not made for ants I guess so I could see the sculpted symbol

>>11591682
No, just don't be a faggot who complains about something he doesn't know anything about. Stupid little bitch. That Venom came out in black like five years ago. No excuses.

>>11591686
Ok so it is body reuse. Sad.

>>11591689
This is a repaint. They've been reissuing older figures as repaints lately. They've also been doing con exclusive repaints too. From figure to figure though, the sculpted detailing is different. Spider Man has different sculpted webbing and chest spider than Ben Reilly Spidey does, even if their build is the same (as it should be). The several different Wolverines they've done are all pretty different, sculpt wise from one another. You're being deliberately obtuse because you realized you were wrong and stupid.

>>11584894
>pic related costed only $50
That's insane. I could imagine paying $20 for that today. Such simple parts.

>>11584643
Animation blocks no longer exist you inbred third world mongrel

>>11585523
“Let’s spend a ton of money on making excellent FNAF toys, an IP WE DO NOT OWN, so when the fad dies out we made a lot less money than if we just made the cheapest crap possible!”
Fucking retard

>>11591674
Aw man I remember when I bought a Halloween Billy Herrington for the aniki memes

>>11599873
Yeah, /toy/ used to have a shit ton of meme buyers back in the day.

REmember when /toy/ used to enjoy toys, instead of shitposting about people enjoying their toys?

/toy/ is too focused on figurines. There are other toys...

>>11591674
Probably the biggest killer of this hobby right now is the lack of firesales. Toys are inherently an unnecessary expense, so people will always try to get deals on them. It was very easy to pick up cheap imports and domestics during Thanksgiving weekend or summer sales when they'd get heavy discounts just to clear inventory, but stores now are more stingy with discounts and have bigger warehouses to store stock for much longer periods of time. They're willing to sit on figures from 2018 since eventually people will Crack and slowly buy them out one by one.

>>11591523
My God, the level of contempt from this post is unreal. Stop being such a fag, goddamn.

Millennials are history’s greatest paypig. Even more so than Boomers and Zoomers. In 60 years when Millennials are all dead, only then will toys, games, computers, consoles, cars, etc return to reasonable prices. Of course, if we even make it that far without nuclear holocaust and so on.

>>11584630
Maybe if corporations didn't price parents out by pandering to the highest paying turbo faggot, maybe they could?

>>11600939
You're mistaken.

Stores aren't keeping prices at MSRP more often and for longer periods of time because they have bigger warehouses.
Stores are keeping MSRP for longer and more often because they still haven't made their money back

Sales are usually done because they are profitable. Clearances, for small retailers, are reserved for when they they already made their money back /and/ just want to sell off the last bit of stock (usually just above break even).
Only stores like Walmart can afford to do just get rid of stock at deep clearance prices, whether they made a profit or not.

So if stores aren't having firesales, it's because toys aren't selling as well as they used to. The stores aren't being stingy, they're actually having trouble justifying stocking a toyline if they aren't making their money back that they can no longer afford to put old stock on clearance.

Also, you can find firesale prices at places like Ross or Burlington Coat Factory. PEople find lines like GI Joe Classified and Star Wars for $6 a figure. You might find a movie line from Marvel LEgends or DC Multiverse from time to time too.

See pic? You can buy this army builder pack that comes with 3 figures for $15 , when they originally cost ~$70.

>>11601660
cute pic