Thread 11614855

They will still be making Sonic merch until 2029
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/11/03/3179332/0/en/JAKKS-Pacific-and-SEGA-of-America-Renew-Global-Toy-Partnership-for-Sonic-the-Hedgehog-Merchandise.html

>>11614856
That bike is a bit shit.

I really wish Jakks treated Mario the same way they do Sonic
I want a 64 Mario, a Sunshine Mario, a Paper Mario, I want the partners, I want Tour costume characters, I want Pauline, K. Rool, Funky, Dixie and Cranky...
Geno and Mallow too.

Did anyone else pick up the Yours Truly, Princess Peach figure? I have to say, it’s pretty cool. I think the float action thing is kooky but it kind of works. Really interesting way to give her some play features.

>>11614856
grotesque.

I never ever see anything new, is it a regional thing or are you guys waiting for simething too? Should i try target instead of WM?

>>11615854
*bat shit

>>11614855 (OP)
When the fuuuuuuck are we getting the last of the Koopa Kids???

>>11616149
>Should i try target instead of WM?
If both are convenient to you, you should always try them. Offer to do grocery shopping for your Mom or someone else who lives nearby, if you don't have to do it for yourself.

>>11616001
Nintendo won't let them. Nintendo pisses away opportunities to make money(was rorse under incompetent Reggie Feel-Me though) while butching about how emulation is costing them cash(it does not). If not for Pokemon being handled by another sub-company it would probably have no merch, either.

Especially shit when they refuse to license merch for anything not getting a current game.

>>11616860
Or you can be a grown ass man and go to the store for the fucking sonic toys whenever you want

>>11614855 (OP)
Gilius and Shinobi are available at walmart. No more Roo or Weredragon, it seems. Hopefully, you were lucky enough to get either latter.

>>11616001
I suspect its a Nintendo thing at this point. Mattel Hot Wheels Mario Kart also stopped making new stuff about the same time Jakks did. There's probably a reason for that. I think this anon >>11617129 is right.