>>2793143 (OP)
That's what happens when you fly Air Jeet.

Imagine the smell

>India sullies 787's no casualties safety record

>>2793164
air india have a surprisingly good safety record
boeing not so much
>>2793168
curry's ready

>>2793169
>boeing sullies air india's 40-year record of no air fatalities

>>2793170
Fake news. Air India has constant crashes and safety issues, thousands of fatalities. Look it up on Wikipedia.

>>2793176
ya know anon you can just stick to one thread with your desperate apologetics
>constant
the last entry on that screenshot is 40+ years ago
since then there has been one bomb and one freak accident

>>2793182
More fake news. There are several pages of crashes after that. Why lie when anyone can look it up on Wikipedia?

>>2793186
yeah, with no fatalities
ffs anon either stick to this thread or the other one with your pathetic corporate cocksucking

>>2793190
Wikipedia literally says thousands of fatalities. What's the point of lying? Anyone who knows how to use the internet will know you're lying.

>>2793193

>>2793197
The first 90% of your picrel is the fatal crashes. Do you really think anons are blind and will miss those?

>>2793198
you're really invested in trolling as much as possible today huh
anyway here is a handy guide to 43 years of air india fatalities

>>2793143 (OP)
The video makes it clear that when things go wrong, planes can fall out of the sky in the course of a few seconds. The odds of dying a plane crash have to be increasing with all these recent crashes. It's an epic way to go.

>>2793199
Thousands of Air India fatalities. These are facts.

You're also missing the Air India Express fatalities (listed on a different page).

>>2793143 (OP)
The combination of Air India and a Boeing doesn't really fill me with confidence...
Is there a league table anywhere of the deadliest airlines?

>>2793219
787 is a good plane though?
Has a pretty solid record

>>2793164
>That's what happens when you fly Air Jeet.
You would think people would learn, but no. No one listens to us.

>>2793228
Well, the passengers were mostly jeets. And no, they don't listen to us, and they don't learn. As for the 50 brits on board, they were probably jeet-simps.

>>2793222
Associated Press says this is the first fatal crash for the 787.

>>2793228
yes if only the international aviation community paid more attention to random mouthbreathers on 4chan the world would be a much safer place

>>2793230
some of them are indians with british citizenship, they're counted as british

>>2793242
It's funny when people on social media hate on their own platform. Bruh, just go somewhere else.

With the way they cram people into transportation like cattle in that country, I wouldn't be surprised if the plane was over its weight limit.

Forensic analysts say the Indian passengers defecated in the aisles. Before take-off.

Can I get by traveling with just never flying again? Maybe just travel by boat if I have to go to another country? I hate flying so much. Not only do I get incredibly nauseous and end up drenched in a cold sweat by the end of every flight, it also seems like its getting increasingly dangerous. I just never want to ride a plane again for the rest of my life.

>>2793269
Depends on where you are. Europe/Asia? Yeah, you're fine, plenty to visit within that landmass.

US/NA? Travel within the US is pretty shit right now. Sea travel's going to make you nauseous too, plus you'll be stuck in a tiny cabin for days.

>>2793269
>Can I get by traveling with just never flying again? Maybe just travel by boat if I have to go to another country?
yes sure you can do that
after all boats never sink

>>2793271
nta but I'd rather be on a sinking boat than a nose-diving plane.

>>2793270
I'm in the US. I've been on a cruise one time as a kid and don't remember getting sick. If I can ride a boat to any country I don't think I'll mind the travel time. a week of lazing around on a boat almost seems better than 12 hours of anxiety, nausea and exhaustion to me.
>>2793271
Seems more likely to survive a sinking ship.

>>2793274
Could work but there are limitations. There aren't that many cruises to most other countries. The Caribbean, Mexico, and nearby areas, sure, but not many to other continents. You could be waiting a while for a spot, and there really aren't too many cruises in the winter.

>>2793277
Royal Caribbean: no transatlantic cruises
Holland America: a few cruises, almost all in March, April, or October. Only one in July that takes 35 days.
Norwegian Cruise Lines: Only one cruise to Europe in August. Nothing else in 2025 or 2026.

>>2793143 (OP)
I guess a few dead a year is the price to pay to have a few % more of profits.
I wonder if Boeing stock owners actually fly Boeing.

>>2793291
jeets aren't people, the cost here was zero

>>2793290
There's a steady stream of transatlantic cruises up until late Autumn. A quick look on Seascanner has 121 transatlantic cruises for the rest of the year.

You're pretty much forced to use Cunard if you want a 7 day one though as they're the only company that still has proper ocean liners.

>>2793294
It's showing me 16 cruises for the rest of this year. And for some reason 3 of those are Seattle-Alaska-Seattle, which is definitely not transatlantic.

If it's Boeing i'm not going

DEPLOY FLAPS NOW
WARNING RATE OF DEPARTURE IS BEYONG KNOWN LIMIT
DEPLOY FLAPS NOW

>169 Indian nationals, 53 British nationals, seven Portuguese nationals and one Canadian

What's with the 1 Canadian?

>>2793316
>53 British nationals
I wonder how many of these are actual brits, and not just more pajeets with a UK passport.

>>2793330
Full passenger list:

https://insiderpaper.com/air-india-plane-crash-full-list-of-passengers-onboard/

>>2793331
I actually read the whole thing. Almost everyone is a jeet. I only saw two UK citizens with non-Indian sounding names.

>two entire pages that were just Patel
kek

>haha only happens to jeets, i will always fly boeing on white airlines
>NO THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING

>>2793350
imagine getting this angry over some dead jeets

>>2793353
I don't give a shit, I'm laughing at people flying boeing to own the jeets

>>2793354
pretty sure the jeets are the ones who got owned

>>2793164
That's what happens when you don't tip your pilot.

>>2793170
>air india have a surprisingly good safety record
I don't trust anything "good" out of Indians. I've worked with Indians in many different jobs across multiple industries. They're always fudging things up. They don't actually care about doing a good job, they only care about doing enough to LOOK good. Some technician is cutting corners, or some admin is cooking the books.

> wont fly boeing
as if you stupid faggots have any idea the type of plane youre boarding. i do because i'm actually a plane fag, but dont pretend you cunts know.

>>2793232
I remember everyone freaking out when it was first flown due to being mostly carbon fiber but that all turned out to be FUD
From an experience standpoint I love the dreamliners, they're comfy, probably my favorite modern plane.

>>2793459
yeah so im this plane fag nigga >>2793458

I hear the A350 is the shit but never flown on one yet. But yeah the dreamliner was a game changer. The 777-300ER is my favourite though. It looks so long, reminds me of something familiar.

>>2793269
I have a fear of flying too. Get xanax from a doctor before a flight, its been a lifesaver for me

>>2793503
Don't think I've done the A350 but heard good things about it.
787 is great for long haul which is mostly what I catch, the cabin pressure and humidity is legitimately noticable, especially overnight. I think newer models have caught up and manage it now too but at the time it was a big difference on arrival after a redeye
Flew on the 737-Max last week, made me laugh because I've always been intrigued by it but never had chance to, was accidental last minute booking due to a cancelled connection. Wasn't too bad, the double winglet thing looks fucking weird though.
t. plane nerd with two commercial pilots in the family