>is supposed to be one of the best if not the best blade runner in the city
>gets absolutely outsmarted, outplayed, and manhandled by every replicant he comes across throughout the movie
Seriously, I was getting secondhand embarrassment watching his last confrontation with Roy. Here was the two threads of the narratives colliding, and instead of being excited, I was cringing the entire way. Deckard looked like he was about to cry and call for his mummy any minute.

>>211357955 (OP)
>plotfag got filtered
This isn’t that kind of movie. This is the type of movie you watch when you just wanna feel something. It looks pretty and has a good style. You fags who complain
>style over substance
Are just retarded zoomers who have been over socialized and can’t grasp anything beyond tik tok shorts that go on for 10 seconds.

Every single thread on /tv/ right now is bait.

>>211357955 (OP)
Yeah Deckard is a pathetic lonely man while the replicants are ubermenschen, it's intentional. They even cast a Dutch actor and dyed his hair platinum blond like a nazi caricature for Roy Batty

>>211357955 (OP)
Yeah I think that was the point. He is a human man, not a replicant who was bioengineered to work or fight.

>>211358027
First post best post.
>>211357955 (OP)
It’s not really about the fight corgraphics, it’s about being in a certain detached mood. By that point in the movie I’m barely registering the details on screen.
It’s like criticizing Monet by saying his flowers are not realistic lay detailed, way to miss the painting bro.

>>211357955 (OP)
>by every replicant
they were nexus 6's

>>211357955 (OP)
Bladefags have a stock rationalization for every single critique you could possibly make of this film. It's one of those things you have to keep to yourself if you want to use this board with your sanity intact.

>>211357955 (OP)
Everything after Blade Runner has turned them into le super hero ninja assassins, but in the original they are just dudes and their special skill is being very detailed detectives. They are good at looking around, finding clues, whittling things down and finding the culprit. And the replicants they dealt with 99% of the time were pretty damn easy to spot. They had zero empathy, were dumb and fairly easy to discover, and would pretty much give up when they were caught. The VK machine worked really well on them. Deckard visits Holden in the hospital and they discuss the current replicants. Holden is freaked out because these NEW Nexus 6 Replicants are very unusual. They very difficult to tell apart from humans and way better at passing the test and fighting back. Rachel is even better at passing the test. Bryant and Deckard were worried the VK test might not even work anymore soon. So point is, Deckard had never dealt with this kind before and based on the old models had been expecting pretty much robots that were easy to discover and just took a pistol shot to bring down, rather than super strong deadly terminators that were indistinguishable from humans.

>>211358027
>>211358441
Despite being heavy on atmosphere, plot is very much supposed to be important in the film, even if it's just a generic detective potboiler. It's not some vibey impressionistic arthouse movie where structural logic don't matter. It's not even accidentally that.

>>211358873
Blade Runner's plot is great though. Very engrossing. The worst part of the film is the "romance" between Deckard and Rachel. But the rest of it is fantastic

>>211358995
>The worst part of the film is the "romance" between Deckard and Rachel.
I like it

>>211357955 (OP)
Blade Runners are detectives, not commandos. Deckard was one of the best because of his ability to identify and track down replicants, and also his ability to switch off his own humanity. And technically he wins every confrontation in the movie.

>>211359006
Them running away together was good. The "love" scene was terrible and Sean Young hated it. It literally made her cry on set. The follow up in 2049 was a terrible direction to take it. A replicant made for breeding dies delivering the first baby? Lame.

>>211359369
Why did Deckard rape her?

>>211359356
All four of them should have killed him kek. Zora stopped for no reason just because some other dancers came in, but she had the kill shot lined up. Leon tossed him around a lot when he could have killed him, until Rachel showed up. Pris had him completely dead to rights then decided to run off and do acrobatics. Roy gave up and spared him because he was seconds from dying. No wonder Deckard retired again.

Blade Runner isnt even his career. He was probably shit hot back in the day until killing replica humans gave him PTSD and alcoholism to deal with the shakes. He got his ass kicked by all of them because he was shitfaced drunk the whole movie.

>>211359394
Ford has a thing for underage, vulnerable girls

Anybody played the game?

>>211359430
I like this take

>>211357955 (OP)
is supposed to be one of the best Resistance soldier and is why he was sent back to protect Sara Conner
>gets absolutely outsmarted, outplayed, and manhandled by one single Terminator
>Dies

>>211359394
Because Ridley Scott was pissed off at Sean Young and told Ford to force himself on her without telling her he was gonna do it.

>>211359868
>successfully saves Sarah from Terminator attack three times
>blows terminator in half with pipe bomb
Nigger he did much, much better against the Terminator than Deckard did against the Replicants.

>>211359369
>Sean Young hated it. It literally made her cry on set.
who cares lol

>>211359557
the 1997 game? Yes, I played it in March

ama

>>211359961
is it good

>>211358617
That's because none of your "critiques" have any substance. They are easily dismissed because you are an intellectual lightweight

>>211359966
Yes, but I also enjoy old school point and click games like Monkey Island.

If you're a modern gamer with no patience, you might find it boring and get annoyed.

use
https://www.uhs-hints.com/
if you need hints on where to go next


It has amazing atmosphere, and does some very interesting things with the story. The pixel background art is gorgeous IMO. I would recommend it, I just played the GoG version and I don't think it even needed any fixes to get working, pretty much just opened it and it worked right away.

>>211360032
very cool

>>211358617
Bladefag here, the only critique I don't have a stock rationalization for was when I tried to show the movie to my friend and he fell asleep.

>>211359966
Gonna second this >>211360032
You can try to play it several times the same way but you'll still get different endings. It's rad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-iwkkk6El0

>>211357955 (OP)
>is supposed to be one of the best if not the best blade runner in the city
He's not.
The whole point is he's a shitty human being - even the robot he was chasing after (Roy) had more soul and humanity than he did, hence the tag line MORE HUMAN THAN HUMAN.

>>211360162
it's a vibe movie, you need a specific mindset to enjoy Blade Runner and it's becoming less common because people have shorter attention spans

>>211357955 (OP)
The Ultimate rep who fools him is not called Roy but Rachel, you fag.

>>211359430
more interesting than the usual Deckard=Replicant useless threads.
we perfectly know he is not.

>>211357955 (OP)
How the FUCK did they keep making more
Didn't it flop on literally ALL iterations?

>>211357955 (OP)
They fluctuate his fumbling/stoic levels because what is the final speech with a dead-eyed determined deckard. He/you won't listen to it.

The charm of the actor to make you forget all that shopwork is why they earn the big bucks, u r the gay to feel embarrassed about anything btw.

Is he a robot or not? I’m too stupid for the movies. Also are they robots or like androids or what? I I don’t it.

>>211358027
>>211360243
wait is this true? I have always enjoyed this film and its atmosphere but never knew the plot was supposed to be irrelevant. Does this apply to other 70s-80s ridley scott films?

>>211360475
the plot isn't irrelevant, it's just slow and methodic and a lot of normies can't handle the film noir stuff and go in expecting an action movie

>>211359394
women owe him robosex

>>211360472
>Is he a robot or not?
no
>Also are they robots or like androids or what?
they're artificial humanoids grown in a lab with preset genes and attributes, like a clone

>>211359950
Right? Lmao.

I always thought Ford was just kind of shit in this film.

>>211358172
>Every single thread on /tv/ right now is
40% bots
20% shills
20% demoralization propaganda
10% shitposts
10% legit /tv/ threads

>>211360988
>10% legit /tv/ threads
lol nope

>supposed to feel bad for the replicants dying
>they dindu nuffin
>not only are they not human but they kill innocent on the shuttle, kill and hurt more people on earth and kill their creator

>>211357955 (OP)
Deckard's profound fear in the final sequence is the point of the entire movie, OP. Come on.
>i don't know how old the average /tv/ poster is but admittedly bladerunner didn't fully click for me until i was 30

>>211359415
I figured that was intentional. They didn't WANT to kill him - They just wanted to be left alone to live their lives. All that Roy wanted in the end was for someone (Deckard) to feel what he felt in that moment; Profound fear of inevitable death. He was never going to actually kill him.

>>211360472
Yes he is a replicant
The original theater version takes out the Unicorn scene, so Gaff leaving the origami unicorn for Deckard at the end seems arbitrary, but Ridley put the Unicorn scene back in the Directors cut, showing Gaff knows Deckard is a replicant, also Gaff says at the end "You have done a man's job, sir".

Deckard is a replicant. So was Tyrell. Batty was originally going to find the dead body of the human Tyrell in a burial chamber in the Tyrell building after he killed the replicant Tyrell, but Ridley was unable to film it.

>>211361722
Retard
The entire film is literally about him being human and confronting that against the replicants

>>211360920
He's very good in the film and channelling a more pathetic version of Bogart

>>211357955 (OP)
He's a replicant with memories of best blade runner

>>211361750
The entire film is literally about it not mattering whether any of them are human or otherwise. Jesus christ, is this 'us vs them' mentality so deeply ingrained in modern USamerican culture that people can't comprehend an incredibly straightforward 50-year-old movie?

>everyone is American
This is how redditors discuss movies? Jesus

>>211357955 (OP)
But that's the point. His job is to go against literal superhumans. There arent many that can even do it at all, and even the best get their asses kicked.
It's why the scene in 2049 where he takes down Bautista is important - to show that replicants can be better Blade runners as well.

Also, Decker getting his ass kicked and generally being shit is a VERY BIG CLUE to whether he is human or not.
One that cant just be retconned into director's cuts.

>>211361750
>Ridley has said for the past 30 years Deckard is a replicant
You are the true retard here, congrats.

>>211362361
Ridley is just one person who worked on the movie, pretty much everyone else who worked on it disagrees

>>211361867
>Also, Decker getting his ass kicked and generally being shit is a VERY BIG CLUE to whether he is human or not.
I cannot believe people still mentally stumble on this every fucking time.

If Tyrell gave Deckard super strength like a regular replicant, HE WOULD NEVER HUNT THE ESCAPED REPLICANTS BECAUSE HE KNOWS THEY WOULD KILL HIM TOO. How the fuck do people still not understand this? They gave Deckard A FUCKING GUN. Gun >super strength.

>>211360032
>>211360196
You can play it for free on scummvm. I had a lot of fun with it. It's like a sidequel of the movie, and also recreation of events from the book. So neat to go to all the movie locations plus many that fit the theme

>>211362439
>why dont people get my idiotic headcanon to excuse a very very wrong understanding of film
People are just too intelligent to get you.

>>211362439
>If Tyrell gave Deckard super strength like a regular replicant, HE WOULD NEVER HUNT THE ESCAPED REPLICANTS BECAUSE HE KNOWS THEY WOULD KILL HIM TOO. How the fuck do people still not understand this?
That is honestly the dumbest circular logic I've seen posted here for awhile, I'd honestly reccomend you shut the fuck up and leave the thread because you have no credibility after posting something so stupid.

>>211362412
Ridley is the director of the fucking movie, I would say what he says trumps what every elses says about it.

Stop giving me this weak ass shit, if this is all you have for your argument, fuck off.

>uhh uhhhh the 2nd assistant to the lighting director says he's human, so....HE'S HUMAN!

>>211362465
>Your post is dumb...because...um it just is, ok
Great logic there.

>>211357955 (OP)
>Deckard looked like he was about to cry and call for his mummy any minute.

Local cop suddenly not so tough when dangled from the top of a skyscraper.

>>211362485
Ridley was just a guy hired to do a job, he's not an auteur, he did not write the script or come up with the story. Blade Runner is not "his" movie, it's a studio project he had very little creative input on. Most of the iconic status of Blade Runner can be credited to the screenwriters, the set design, the special effect crew, the Vangelis soundtrack and the cast.

>>211357955 (OP)
>"I was SUPPOSED to FEEL LIKE THE BIG HERO watching this! I was supposed to BE THE BLADERUNNER! And they RUINED IT for me!!"

Consoomers like you are so fucking gay. Go play a faggy paladin in WoW or some shit nerd lol

>>211357955 (OP)
It's mentioned in Electric Sheep that he set a new record in catching so many in one day, and he catches four in the movie, which is still a lot of criminals in one case. (Rachel helped for one though.) Keep in mind he is basically a regular bum facing off against four superhuman impersonators and he found them all in a city of tens of millions.

>>211362485
Ridley literally changed the entire movie to suit another narrative. Deckard was 100% unequivocally a human in the movie. There's scenes of him and Holden talking and they've been friends for years and retired replicants for years. Deckard did not just show up out of the blue. Then years later, after the movie was so popular, Ridley decided to go back in and change it all to add le retarded twist because he's stupid like that. He wanted Ripley to get her head torn off and the alien to speak in her voice too, because it's le shocking twist.

>>211357955 (OP)
Probably being the "best" bladerunner doesnt mean youre physically strong it would mean he has a hiigh kill count and willingness to kill realistic replicants whereas its probably an issue and emotionally pressing for a lot of them. Retard.

>>211362963
It just means they're a good detective. Finding clues, interviewing people, telling if someone is lying, gathering evidence, finding the perp, etc. He's not some kungfu master

>>211361807
>The entire film is literally about it not mattering whether any of them are human or otherwise
Which is precisely why it matters. If everyone is a replicant, then you haven't actually demonstrated that there is no difference.

>>211361722
Its still intentionally ambiguous, there is a deeper subtext about dreams you are leaving out, when the credits music drops at the end and its hard synth its him dealing with the notion that either his mind was fucked with and he had implanted dreams, or yes hes a replicant. But the sequel definitely clarifies he was a human and because of that his child was hunted to be studied, and thats the official canon. I can see from how you are insulting and attacking the people who replied to you that youre going to violently disagree with me too for no reason at all, you seem like a happy and charming person.

>>211363042
His consumption for of liquor in the movie indicates the killing takes an emotional toll. The scene where he meets rachel in the rainy streets is right after a kill when he has to go get a bottle of booze to ease his mind. So Im not wrong, its a combination of both things we're saying. The point is combat ability is not why hes considered proficient which is what OP was bitching about.

>>211357955 (OP)
>"What's your favorite movie of all time anon?"
>"Blade Runner."
>"Instantly responds with, "Cringe"

What the fuck is cringe about it?

>>211362963
>it would mean he has a hiigh kill count and willingness to kill realistic replicants whereas its probably an issue and emotionally pressing for a lot of them.
yes, this is my interpretation of Deckard's character, it's an unpleasant job that he used to be really got at but has become weary and alcoholic

>>211359430
This. OP is retarded. The whole point of the introduction is that Deckard moved on from being a blade runner long ago and is only brought back because his replacement died doing the Voight-Kampff test.

>>211363278
He's not dead. Holden is in the hospital and Deckard even goes to see him. Holden is very shaken up because the new replicants are so different. Hard to spot, they want to live, and they fight back so hard

>>211360472
>Is he a robot or not?
the point of it is.. it doesn't matter. if it feels and looks real, why question it? if a being, replicant or not seems real and "human" the connection is there. why else do you think they kept it super vague about it

>>211358321
Rutger Hauer isn't a fucking Nazi, he's a based resistancechad

>>211364096
Forgot pic, watch Soldaat van Oranje

>>211363088
Well Deckard and the audience don't know he's a replicant anyway until the end of the film

>>211363100
>But the sequel definitely clarifies he was a human
I don't think it does

>>211360032
>game has replicants catering to pedophiles

Movie:
That's the point of replicants, they ARE better
Roy especially was a commando model so he was smarter too
They're perfect slaves, but to make sure these better humans you've created don't destroy you you have to limit their lifespan to 5 years
Plus deckard isn't the best, the best got shot and deckard's who they've got lying around

Book: the question is asked, are replicants human?
No, they're sociopaths who deserve to be killed

>>211364288
>Plus deckard isn't the best, the best got shot and deckard's who they've got lying around
Deckard says to use Holden since they were friends and he thinks he's good. Bryant says he wasn't good enough, not as good as Deckard. He needs the old blade runner.

>>211357955 (OP)
I'm starting to think these "Blade Runners" might not have our best interests in mind.

>>211362902
>Ridley literally changed the entire movie to suit another narrative. Deckard was 100% unequivocally a human in the movie.
Bullshit.

>>211364586
Watch the original then, dumbass. All the unicorn shit was added later, scenes were added and things removed to make him appear more replicant.

>>211359950
Why would she cry? It was a romance scene and kissing is part of an actors job. It's not like she actually had to fuck anyone

>>211360920
He's shit in most of his films desu. Lazy actor

>>211364681
most actors are spoiled divas with personality disorders, and Sean Young is considered an especially bad case according to people who worked with her

>>211362485
Imagine going along with retcons

>>211363158
Nothing he's just a contrarian hipster faggot

what the goddamn hell is wrong with zoomers here, on letterboxd, and everywhere being baffled by BR's plot? it's one thing to not pick up on the unicorn origami, but failing to comprehend the linear sequences of this film is some sort of epidemic.
>>211364631
>[non-unicorn] scenes were added and things removed to make him appear more replicant [in the theatrical cut]
everything you just wrote is a lie and you choose to write this in every BR thread. kill yourself.

>>211364681
Have you actually watched the scene? He's grabbing her, slamming her against the wall, staring at her intently and being aggressive. It's not romantic. And just because there's a kiss doesn't make it pleasant. It's one of the worst filmed scenes of the time. Completely 180 degrees opposite of the supposedly intended purpose.

>>211364885
it's called being a man, you little pussy

>>211364913
Shut the fuck up, moron.

>>211364951
man up and fuck a bitch

>>211360196

Natty Portman in Blade Runner 2 Edge of Sophistication. An A.I. movie.

>>211357955 (OP)
The entire point is that deckard is a human fighting things that prove humans are obsolete. And the end proves that they even have some sort of humanity inside of them.

This is specifically why anyone claiming deckard was an Android is retarded.

They put spinners in Back to the Future 2

>>211357955 (OP)
Its true to life. Humans are pretty incompetent. Join the master race anon.

>>211365529
Looks like shit. AI is cooked.

>>211357955 (OP)
>gets absolutely outsmarted, outplayed, and manhandled by every replicant he comes across throughout the movie
I haven't watched it for awhile but I think the group of replicants that Deckard has to track down are much stronger and more intelligent than your average replicant

>>211359966
>is it good
So good. One of my all time favorites. If you like the point/click style and are okay with more of an interactive movie experience, check it out
>Original cast members from the 1982 film who make cameo appearances in the game are Sean Young as Rachael, Brion James as Leon, James Hong as Hannibal Chew, Joe Turkel as Dr. Eldon Tyrell, and William Sanderson as J.F. Sebastian.

>>211360472
He is definitively not. In the book that is. Ridley, being an egotistical fuck, wanted to leave it open to interpretation but again, he is not, because of what James Bond said here: >>211366007

>>211366124
I wonder why they couldn't get Harrison Ford or Captain Bryant

>>211359986
>That's because none of your "critiques" have any substance
Bladefags should be a big fan of them then.

They literally tell you at the beginning of the movie that Nexus 6 replicants are better than him.

>>211366120
All of them aside from Roy are retarded. Leon's dumb and gets shot by Rachel, Zora has the chance to kill Deckard but runs and gets shot in the back, Pris has the chance to kill Deckard but does acrobatics and also gets shot

>>211366208
>Harrison Ford or Captain Bryant
Wasn't surprised by no Harrison Ford, i'm sure he isn't cheap

>>211357955 (OP)
>gets absolutely outsmarted, outplayed, and manhandled by every replicant he comes across throughout the movie

They're Nexus 6 series replicants the most advanced model Tyrel makes more advanced than anything Decker has had to deal with before. Roy in particular is designed to be a master strategist and a killing machine.

>>211364259
Most likely based on Mary, the 5th replicant that was supposed to be in the movie and then later cut due to lack of money. The actress playing her was petite and fragile.

>>211361722
>The original theater version takes out the Unicorn scene
It wasn't taken out, there was no unicorn scene. It was footage from another film that Ridley Scott added to later cuts because he doesn't understand what makes his own films good,

>>211366338
>All of them aside from Roy are retarded.
They come across as autistic and socially stunted but not really retarded

>>211364187
And? You're saying the message isn't actually undermined until it is?

>>211365529
somebody get this guy out of here

>>211357955 (OP)
You can thank the retards who made the movie for completely ruining the story. The took out key characters, they took out all of the conflict and reversed everything they left in. Ended up with a jumbled meandering mess that ends with a retarded driving off into the sunset
>his last confrontation with Roy
Just another thing they fucked up. There isn't supposed to be any confrontation, he explicitly states that is something he hates about androids that they don't fight back they just give up. The important part is JR experiencing the spider being resurrected and Rick getting home to find his goat dead leading to a spiral into his own religious experience but they cut both of those out of the movie to make room for more pew pew action bullshit
>>211358027
And retards like this praise it for being shit
>This is the type of movie you watch when you just wanna feel something
But it is completely devoid of emotion
>It looks pretty and has a good style
No, it doesn't, it looks like shit. That isn't style, it's just awful

>>211357955 (OP)
>is supposed to be one of the best if not the best blade runner in the city
>gets absolutely outsmarted, outplayed, and manhandled by every replicant he comes across throughout the movie
Wasn't that the point tho, chud? Replicants are better than humans in everything, including morality and for sure intelligence and physical prowess.

>>211358995
>Blade Runner's plot is great though
It is the worst sort of "a robot learns to love" garbage
>>211363158
It's a really bad movie
>>211364880
>being baffled by BR's plot?
It's nonsense because they cut the actual conflict out. It is barely a plot

>>211368464
What the fuck are you smoking? Take your medicine

>>211364885
>>211359369
Another thing they completely reversed for no clear reason. Why have him force himself on her instead of her seducing him to get him out of the game like she has to many before him? It would be such a better scene the way it was supposed to be
What reason do they even have to meet up in the movie? Neither of them had any reason for this meeting, she isn't planning to seduce him and he doesn't need her help because Pris is not played by the same actress as Rachel. Another meaningless scene in an awful meaningless movie

>>211368622
What?

>>211357955 (OP)
Ford is a shabbos goy thief, a kind of bacha bazi hooker only with less honor.

>>211368622
He's talking about the book that Blade Runner was adapted from; Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
It's crazy how different the movie is to the book. The characters retain their names but everything else about them is radically different.

Is being a rapist a requirement to be a blade runner?

>>211368477
>including morality
When is this demonstrated besides one instance of Roy Batty showing mercy?

>>211368797
>rape
You can't rape a robot you silly. Same way as you can't rape a toaster.

>>211357955 (OP)
I'm perhaps out to lunch here on this one but wasn't the new replicants models getting better and better?

>>211360475
zoomer, people don't have to be 100% honest online nor do you have to believe everything you read

>>211369301
I think so. Thats why I think they're robots or androids. They can't be clone people or they would be to too weak to do space mining and all the other insane feats of strength, speed, and, stamina they can do.

>>211368844
Need more, chud? That scene is remembered bc of a reason, replicants are better in everyway. That gets shown at lenght during the movie, but by the end turns out they're even more righteous than humans lmao, it's the ultimate blow that makes Deckard run away with Rachel, it's pointless to try and kill those damn things.
Deckard is not an invincible hard boiled classic noir detective, he is presented like that at first, but he's just a lanky human that gets constantly pussy whipped by his prey, the closest he gets to being a classic noir main man is when he forces himself on Rachel cuz he sees her as a talking fleshlight. The mercy of Batty convinces Deckard that replicants are kind of more human than humans and makes him see Rachel as something not so disposable. Fuck, Rachel herself is presented as a classic "noir femme fatale", archetype that breaks soon after she finds out she's not a real girl.
Point being, intentional or not, BR is not a noir film, it's neo-noir, or revisited noir, or whatever, it takes noir archetypes and twists them, plus it's too slow, both reasons why people hated it back on the day.

>>211357955 (OP)
why are replicant hunters called blade runners? where does that name come from in universe, what the fuck does running blades have to do with anything

>>211364096
It's common knowledge that the Dutch are what the Prussians always wanted to be in terms of phenotype.

>>211357955 (OP)
In 2049, Wallace says he was specifically referred to the case so he could meet Rachael and bring him a human/skin-job hybrid

>>211371007
>Back when Replicants were first made illegal on earth anyone could bring their remains in for reward. Only the head was needed as proof though, which is why many hunters took to carrying large blades for decapitation of Replicants. This earned them the name Blade Runner. Later when Replicant hunting became a regulated activity and the police took over the task exclusively, without an alternate title the name Blade Runner stuck even though the practice of decapitation was no longer a thing.
There is your explanation, are you happy? Or do you need a better one? Can we finally move on from this dumbass criticism?

>>211368863
The whole point of her being implanted with memories was to make her more than a robot
Tyrell making a replicant that could have children was a massive leap in science. Keep in mind, this is set in the same universe as Alien. The Engineers couldn’t figure out how to do that, but Tyrell did.

>>211364259
>Portrayed by Pauley Perrette
Abby Sciutto?!

>>211361722
ridley scott is a retard trying to redact his own work to be more pretentious

>>211360032
Do you play any wadjet eye games? Gemini Rue, Primordia, Technobabylon, etc