>>211368422 (OP) To be fair modern Hollywood just can't do big battles any justice so what's the point. Did you see how fucking awful the battles were in Ridley Scott's "Napoleon"? Fucking terrible. And that's just early 19th/late 18th century warfare.
Imagine how awful them trying to do a huge WW2 battle would look. Even when Hollywood was semi competent and you look at movies like "Saving Private Ryan" and "Stalingrad" most the action you see is small scale at best.
>>211369295 Cool dipshit let's see you do better then. Or do you only get your rocks off making fun of other people's hard work? Honest question bozo how does it feel knowing you're going to die nameless while Ridley Scott will be immortalized because of the internet?
>>211369319 go to bed Ridley >>211369295 They dont even do small scale combat very well, but i thought the new all quiet movie achieved pretty good battle scenes
>>211369295 >>211369295 >Imagine how awful them trying to do a huge WW2 battle would look. Even when Hollywood was semi competent and you look at movies like "Saving Private Ryan" and "Stalingrad" most the action you see is small scale at best.
Bring back the directing we saw in Patton with the battle of El Guettar. All these real tanks and planes. No CGI slop.
>>211369353 There were a lot more working real planes and tanks from WW2 when that was filmed though.
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 6:46:58 AM No.211369407
There was nothing tactically interesting about the actual battle. Just an open plain of Germans driving all of their tank reserves into extremely well-prepared defenses until they ran out of shit and had to give up.
>>211369407 Movies have never cared about tactics anyway they just want some shoot of a guy screaming and running to his glorious death
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 6:53:22 AM No.211369535
>>211369407 >until they ran out of shit and had to give up. they gave up for two reasons 1. Sicily invasion had just happened by the Anglo-Americans leading to diverting forces to that 2. The offensive stalled, mostly in the north and it could have continued, but it would have been costly.
>hand to hand combat sold this could make a great dramatized action film, its not like most WW2 films are john wick
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 6:56:24 AM No.211369588
>>211369295 Waterloo will never be topped, insane that you can't beat casting hundreds of men in period appropriate outfits, i'd have thought CGI would be indistinguishable by now but its almost declined except in rare instances
>>211369396 The Soviet Union had a lot of Jewish leaders so there's obviously room for Hollywood to put in a self-insert.
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 7:00:03 AM No.211369674
>>211369396 russians represent communists and they were fighting against the country that genocided the precious jews, not hard to see how russians could be the good guys, its not like it'd be praising modern russians
>>211369674 >the Soviet Union is just le Russia What to know how I know you are an idiot?
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 7:04:49 AM No.211369746
>>211369295 The Russians had a few good WWII movies, but mostly because they still had all the equipment leftover/captured from WWII to use.
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 7:06:38 AM No.211369783
>>211369433 Why is there a picture of a negro on her table?
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 7:07:52 AM No.211369816
>>211368422 (OP) because it would show the evil krauts as heroic underdogs with a 5:1 kd ratio
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 8:13:28 AM No.211370960
>>211368422 (OP) and there never will, whole this will be memoryholed so hard
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 8:16:18 AM No.211370991
>>211368422 (OP) >battle >actully several different encounters over a month. Not the biggest single battle, sorry. A battle ends when the got bots go to sleep, thatโs the rule. I suppose if they are on drugs it can go over 24 hours, but thatโs it
Has there ever been a more wild period in terms of development, politics and historical events than Russia in the 1900's? Went from being a literal peasent serfdom and losing a bazillion people in the biggest war ever to launching the first human into space in like 2 decades
>>211372175 >Russia, 1900 >poor shithole but controlled by greedy incompetent morons >Russia, 1999 >poor shithole but controlled by even more greedy incompetent morons
>>211372203 Genuinely can't tell if you're fucking retarded or a seething pajeet. What in the fuck was India doing in the 1900's that was even remotely comparable to the shit that went down in Russia?
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 10:38:02 AM No.211372617
because no one really cares about germans or russians. its the irl equivalent of attack of the clones. who gives a shit
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 10:41:49 AM No.211372665
>>211369674 jews have built up an oppression narrative about the USSR as well.
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 10:43:17 AM No.211372688
>>211369332 You won't fool anyone here, Vasily. Go back into trenches.
>>211371000 The Americans and British stopped advancing 3 months prior because they didn't want to lose men fighting for land that was going to be given to the soviets after the war.
>>211371000 the bombs of the western allies air force
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 12:13:48 PM No.211373724
>>211369535 >It could've been continued No, it went 25 km or so at its furthest penetration They were fucked anyway because the Russian anticipated the attack
Anonymous
6/12/2025, 12:38:43 PM No.211374019
>>211368422 (OP) becuz Jewmerica wasnt involved. also largest tank battle in history. wouldve made a great movie