why is the fourth movie always bad?

>>211394163 (OP)
The cinema experience for the last one was so bad. The editing was horrible: a cut every 2 seconds during chases and fights. Everything wrong with modern action, it was horrible and I don’t even remember the plot or any memorable scenes.

>>211394163 (OP)
I tried watching the first and it was bad as well. Bad colors and lighting, and Damon was not likeable.

>>211394163 (OP)
because you confuse your ass with your eyes.

>>211394163 (OP)
All the Bourne movies were bad. People only thought the first one was good because the close shaky cam and quick cuts was something novel.

>>211394163 (OP)
it was alright

>>211394163 (OP)
three acts is all we need
and the usual spin-off >>211397336

>>211397336
This is actually what I thought the thread was about and yeah it wasn't bad. Felt more like a television show than a film but not bad.

>>211394163 (OP)
Rocky 4 was the best one.

>>211394163 (OP)
Because four is too many. There should never be more than three. There are very few exceptions. One I can think of is the Mission: Impossible series though.

John Wick 4 is good, or at least it's not any worse than 2 or 3.

>>211397336
>there was never just one
How many are left now?