What’s your favorite slasher flick?

>>211439810 (OP)
Me trying to hit the healthy option on the McDonald’s touchscreen menu slab thing, amirite?
Trying to hit the salad or something.

>>211439810 (OP)
Socio economic factors

>>211439810 (OP)
>"Hello, who's there?"

100% Scream 1.
It is such a good flick it should be in the top 10 American films ever made. Its of greater cultural and historical significance than any vietnam war film.

Bride of Chucky

So is it illegal to like surprise kill someone?
Like let's say a rapist is raping my daughter, television and filmly speaking, can I just sneak up on them and blast them in the brains?
What about through the door?
What if they're just destroying my property?
Or do I have to do some faggy shit and be like, >"AHA! HERE I AM I AM LE HONORABLE, NOW WE MAY ENGAGE IN COMBAT!"

My uncle had a DVD called slashers when I was a kid. I stole it and would replay the scene where the Asian chick shows her boobies when all the slashers keep touching her in the dark.

>>211439810 (OP)
This made my brain tingle like crazy.

>>211440088
i guess it would depend on where you live you dingbat

>>211440324
This is an American website and it's a God damned shame that Cuckpoors are allowed to use it.
Don't give me that states rights crap either. 14 to 30 God damned fifty year old woman lesbians from Vermont get to say I can't defend myself because they sat in a room and talked and wrote their names on a piece of paper? Fuck off.

>>211440088
Depends where you live. In some places the Castle Doctrine exists and is applied or held to different standards, Some places if someone as much as crosses into your threshold, like through your door or window into your home you can kill them on the spot. Other places there has to be "reasonable cause" like they're pointing a gun at you or running at you with a knife or even just screaming at you some fuck shit but if they flee your threshold you cant chase them or, say, shoot them in the back a foot off your property. They'd classify that as "excessive force" and you'd probably get slapped with manslaughter, in some places. Then there are the unmentionables where places will let people break into your home, threaten you etc and the best you can do is call the police, run or hide or else you could get sued or something if, say, you got into a fight with them, on your property when you were in danger but ended up injuring them. Yeah. So..

TL;DR Totally depends where you live and local laws, some places you're safer than others in your own home.

>>211439810 (OP)
this looks exactly like the behaviour of a man without a job. he should go to work, forget all this nonsense

>>211440538
Now I'm just getting depressed and angry about what to do about the people who made it so the criminal literally has the right to enter your home and hurt you before you can do anything.
Whether they have a knife, gun, or nothing at all. You have to guess whether or not he's going to shoot you.

>look up the source of this video
>it was posted to reddit asking for help identifying him because they were a single woman who lived alone and were terrified of this
>the mods deleted the thread
>later on those same mods posted on another board about how the original video was fake or some shit and tried to gaslight people into thinking something else entirely

This videos from the apartment complex right next to the one I used to live in Orlando

There were lots of niggers there but it was still a nice place to live. None of them seemed feral like this ape. Good thing is in Florida you can blow these retards away legally

>>211440700
>>211440088
The key is to lie to the police about your state of mind and stick to it.
Even the worst self defence laws on the planet rely largely on fear of death, not the likelihood of it, so you can legally ventilate or stab someone if you say you thought he had the means and motive to kill you.
The reason people come unstuck in the shittier places is because they inadvertently admit they knew it was “only” a subhuman burglar.

>>211440759
the post about it on the orlando sub was locked and had a warning about no racism/hate speech kek

>>211440088
>is it illegal to like surprise kill someone?

>>211440700
I'd advise you stay out of New York then. It has among the worst Stand your Ground laws. Which is basically you have to run away and if you could have avoided a problem by running away and you stood your ground YOU will be the one in trouble. You also cannot be the aggressor inside your own home so you basically have to wait until something happens. There is also no SYG law the applies to anything but a residential home in New York so if you get mugged outside, in your car or at work, well your shit out of luck. Idaho, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Iowa, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Virginia, Vermont, and Washington, D.C are also states with next to no or actual no SYG laws.
On the good end of the spectrum Texas, as one could imagine has probably the best, most robust SYG laws along with Florida. Both requiring zero retreat before you can use deadly force and their laws apply to your car and at work. Laws in Florida do not even require your threshold to have a roof, so you can feel safe in your tent. Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Montana, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, and Washington have similar or at least decently strong SYG laws as well. Choose your home location wisely.

>>211440088
you have to besmirch the rapist's honor by taking off one of your gloves and you slap them with it. then you have someone mediate a duel between you and the rapist and then both take 10 paces then turn and blast that rapist with your flintlock

>>211440088
If you get it done in one attempt, it's a 'crime of passion' in which you act out of a temporary psychosis while defending your loved one.

If you stop halfway through to turn around, go to the closet and pull out a new weapon, then go back to attacking them it becomes aggravated assault / premeditated murder.

I just found out that in the UK, they actually adjust the harshness of their sentencing based on IQ, because IQ is associated with impulse control. So someone is less culpable if their IQ is significantly lower.

>>211439810 (OP)
>dude fucks around with a knife for a few seconds
>hysterical women on 4chan: AAAAHHH THAT'S DANGEROUS!!! SOMEONE SHOULD SHOOT HIM!!!!!
What happened to this place?

>>211441110
>So someone is less culpable if their IQ is significantly lower
How convenient that IQ is a valid metric when it can be used to get niggers out of trouble.

>>211441127
>hahaha look at me!! I'm pretending that I was hatched out of an egg 24 hours ago and don't understand anything about humans

>>211441170
>haha look at me! I'm a dumb racist who reacts in hysterics every time black people do normal shit!!!

>>211439810 (OP)
Nightmare on elm street
Scream
Halloween
Behind the mask: the rise of leslie Vernon
2001 maniacs (if it counts)
Thanksgiving
GirlHouse
Stitches
Terrifier (only the first one and the original short movie)

>>211439810 (OP)
>YOU ARE BANNED