Imagine that you're in an alternate timeline where Jorge Lucas gives you the task of picking a director (or directors) for the SW prequels. The story remains largely the same as the one we all know. Who do you choose?

The story is lazy and hackneyed the director is irrelevant not even the greatest director of all time could make them tolerable

>>211522128 (OP)
No other director had the guts to do it.

>>211522128 (OP)
Jorge Lucas

Tarantino so I get more Padme feet

>>211522128 (OP)
Gonk.

>>211522128 (OP)
The story is decent, most of the worst touches in the prequels are from things a good director would fix, cinematography, choreography, dialogue.

>>211522128 (OP)
godfather offer spielberg or ron howard

>>211522128 (OP)
Probably Spielberg, but who knows, perhaps some of the guys that were around at the time, Verbinski, Singer, Cuaron, it would have been interesting i guess lol.
But yeah in the end like it or not i gotta admit Lucas has his style and there's no Star Wars without him, but yeah he would have still been there supervising everything.

Jim Cameron

>>211522128 (OP)
Robert Zemeckis - TPM
Ang Lee - CW & RotS

>>211523540
>Ang Lee
I wanted to name that too together with the ones i named above, but not sure about Zemeckis desu.

>>211522128 (OP)
George Lucas

>>211522128 (OP)
Paul W.S Anderson
Ez

>>211524247
Yeah we already had that...

Gore Verbinski

>>211522128 (OP)
Werner Herzog

>>211522128 (OP)
No one could save this script.

>>211522128 (OP)
I would go with JJ Abrams, Steven Spielberg and Quentin Tarantino...

Meh they just needed a couple more drafts to iron out some of it, and someone to write more natural dialogue

>>211522128 (OP)

Michael Apted so it doubles down on the Roman Republic allegories

Lynch

>>211525737
He genuinely did a great job with Dune