>Harry Potter reboot
>no actor who looks even remotely like the illustrations of Harry we see in the book
It's over.
>>211614384 (OP)You haven't seen him in the fit.
I'm actually more interested in how the production design and costumes are going to look.
Because they can't just be derivative of movies but also can't stray away from familiar design.
>>211614384 (OP)I can already tell he's going to get less attractive as he ages into the role.
You guys kept saying you're not going to watch anyways due to black Snape so who cares then?
>>211614384 (OP)Couldn’t they cast a less gay looking kid? His balls haven’t even dropped and he already looks like a flaming homo.
This is a show for children
why are you watching it? are you a /co/ tranny or something?
It's never over. At least, that's how it seems every trudging second of this, the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>Harry Potter reboot
>no actor who looks even remotely like the illustrations of Harry we see in the book
>It's over.
>>211614790Atlas Shrugged sucks. If you have to read Rand, read We The Living.
close enough as long as he has glasses
>>211614384 (OP)He's white. That's all that matters turd
>>211617048he looks abit weird, this is the only image of him ive seen, hes got a very teethy grin for a kid
>>211616709I had no idea Harry was Indian
>>211617281There's another image of him where he looks a bit more like a chad.
>Harry Potter reboot
>no actor who looks even remotely like the illustrations of Harry we see in the book
>It's over.
>>211614631>Couldn’t they cast a less gay looking kid? His balls haven’t even dropped and he already looks like a flaming homo.But enough about your personal fantasies.
>>211614384 (OP)>no actor who looks even remotely like the illustrations of Harry we see in the bookWdym harry is literally a generic brown haired green eyed brit kid
>>211618244Harry has jet black hair.
