This was obviously Catholic propaganda but it's still a pretty good movie.

>>211621252 (OP)

Thomas More is a saint, you cocksucking heathen.

I would give the thread the benefit of a post, for my amusement sake

yawn, another (((D&C))) thread

>>211621310
It wasn't necessary for the only character in the movie who praises Luther to basically also say "I am a goofy retard with no principles and am comic relief".

>>211622248
Yeah I feel like a Lutheran sympathizer would be more skeptical of King Henry since he was a pretty hardcore Catholic prior to the whole divorce drama

>>211622248

If you're referring to More potential son-in-law, More makes it clear that he is not "retarded" but a young, ambitious man who is vulnerable to fashionable new ideas.

BOBBY BOLT KINO!!!

>>211623099
>More makes it clear that he is not "retarded" but a young, ambitious man who is vulnerable to fashionable new ideas.
And what do you think the consequence of that is? He's literally the only outspokenly Protestant character in the movie and More has a le ebin dunk on Luther and later in the movie the son in law stops being a Protestant, iirc.

>>211621252 (OP)
Oh yeah it is. Costuming alone is top tier.

>>211621252 (OP)
where can i watch this kino? is it on netflix?

>>211623460

Yeah well, fuck protestantism and fuck that failed Augustinian monk.

>>211624101
Daily reminder that
>No evidence exists that Peter was ever Bishop of Rome
>Peter never exercised his authority as leader of the church through the office of the Bishop of Rome
>Peter never attached his authority to any particular administrative position, much less a particular regional Bishopric
>Peter nor Jesus never laid down a mechanism through which the authority granted to Peter could be transferred to another individual.
>Peter never stated that his position as head of the church was a permanent fixture meant to be replicated.
>The Bishops of Rome did not claim Peter was the first Bishop of Rome until they conveniently "remembered" it more than two centuries after the fact.
>The Bishops of Rome somehow "forgot" they were in charge of the church for hundreds of years while being appointed and dismissed by an Emperor they pledged spiritual subservience to, or even following the orders of The Bishop of Milan as a “higher ranking” Bishop.

>>211624781

Daily reminder that you're gay and your dick is small.

>>211626402
Cope

>MC winds every argument
>Opponents all stupid/evil, and secretly know it
>More's own history of torturing and burning heretics whitewashed
How can a pro Catholic movie be so reddit?

>>211626730
>oh no my raging homosexuals and rabid lesbians being burned because they didn't even bother running away even after people warned them

>>211621252 (OP)
>>211621310
Thomas Moore was a wishy-washy loser who copped out by constantly going "Mmmmm tecknicallyyyy......."

>>211628024
yet anglicans have female priests officiating LGBT marriages
technically he was right, sharty
>basedjack.jpg

>>211628024
forgot the pic
>>211628276
I'm not arguing the state of the religions that followed I'm just saying he wasn't this heroic man taking a stand he was a dork

>>211621552
Based sophisticate.

>>211621252 (OP)
>This was obviously Catholic propaganda but it's still a pretty good movie.
The Mission also, but the plot is bad and the writing is mid.

>>211624781
>>No evidence exists that Peter was ever Bishop of Rome
Also reminder that there isn't evidence for Jesus having been a real person either, same with Moses.
Christcucks criticizing Christcucks are right. Christcucks defending their own brand of Christianity are wrong.

Here we go with another weak christbait thread with some devil worshipping christcuck larping as a christcuck.