Reading this just makes me realize that she was the best thing about the Harry Potter series

Bump

>>211644177 (OP)
did they get the shot?

>>211644177 (OP)
Alex Watson is relentlessly handsome.

>>211647637

>>211647968
That’s see through…

It should be mandatory for all chicks' 18th birthday to have to let all guys to get a gander at their cooter. It's common courtesy.

>>211649083
That’s what porn is for anon

>>211647968
haha, nice camera work

SLYTHERIN’D

>>211649188
porn is gay

>>211651441
Did they…you know

>>211644177 (OP)
So, doing it when they're 18 is legal?

>Reading this just makes me realize that she was the best thing about the Harry Potter series

>>211644177 (OP)

>>211647968
Why did she choose to wear see-through underwear knowing full well that there would be hundreds of cameras looking for precisely this kind of shot? Did she secretly enjoy the attention and voyeurism from paparazzis?

>>211652519
She was madly in love with Tom Felton.

>>211651441
>pajeet-tier photoshop

>>211644177 (OP)
if you ever feel like roping and want something to push you over the edge, go and read through the comments on that reddit post

>>211644177 (OP)
>1) the upskirt shots were clearly taken from a standing position while she was getting into a car
>2) it was outside a nightclub, not her house
i fucking hate normies so fucking much

>>211644177 (OP)
If that really happened that would also be illegal regardless of her age lol

>>211644177 (OP)
>attempted
No, they got them

>>211647968
>>211648826
>>211650953
>>211652519
it's fake unfortunately. the bush anyway. i remember masturbating to it back in high school on 4gifs

>>211644177 (OP)
Maybe I should become a paparazzi photographer...

>>211644177 (OP)
Now if only she had a sex tape leak from around that time.

>>211647968
>We've got bush!

>>211654343
no it isn't, you fucking zoomer

>>211654343
you're a fucking retard

>and then published them
where are they then?!

It should've been illegal to release the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>211656843
this is the main one that got printed in all the tabloids >>211647968

>>211657236
Yes but if there's dudes laying on the pavement taking photos where the hell are those.

>>211654589
>honk

>>211657387
They were so good they kept them for themselves.