>Gobekli Tepe
>Spring Equinox
>Younger Dry Ass
>Ayahuasca
>Sahara Desert
>True North
>Olmec Heads
Truly one of the greatest thinkers of our time
>>211651407 (OP)He kinda looks like Jim Carrey, if you squint.
YOUNGER Dry ass? You sick fuck!
hq720
md5: 62f6be6957d5d525c6882e9b4952bacb
🔍
Graham unironically got mindbroken by Dibble. You could tell he was seething so much only an hour in
>>211652742>>211652748>Muh raysismThe absolute state of modern archeology.
1keanu
md5: 19296359d3a461c9ae602ef905c1d400
🔍
>Dude I could always sense something was wrong with the history they were telling us.
>>211652748Yeah and it's sad that Hancock couldn't debate him face to face but instead cowardly made a follow up video on his youtube trying to damage control. Dibble won. Bigly.
>we can't know for a fact something didn't exist, therefore we must with absolute certainty proclaim it can exist
Is this sound reasoning?
>what if this ancient civilization didn't figure things out on their own, and instead there was an even more ancient civilization that taught them everything they know... that figured everything out on their own
>what if all of the evidence across many fields and disciplines researching history over different parts of the world is all wrong, and I'm right
>what if this rudimentary symbol of a snake (wavy line) in one temple is related to a rudimentary symbol of a snake (wavy line) in another temple, which means a globe-spanning civilization existed
>what if there was a civilization that spread throughout the entire planet, but left no trace whatsoever because they built everything out of paper mache only on the coastline, leaving on inland trace, roads, mines, artifacts, no trace whatsoever
>what if the proof for this ancient civilization is super well hidden just outside of view and to prove it you have to inspect every grain of sand in the sahara, otherwise you just can't tell
What do you mean proof? I'm just asking questions...