They just keep making up new rules.

>>211664985 (OP)
You can beat death with a glock.

>>211664985 (OP)
Just like every horror franchise?

A decades old penny is a weapon of mass destruction

>>211664985 (OP)
it's kind of dumb how the real reason for all the other movies is this starting event of cheating death even though the other movies generally have a clairvoyant in them who cheats death in their own event
but it doesn't necessarily contradict them either
the real question is why the original woman had the clairvoyance and if there's another older origin that this is just part of and if actually every death is going to trace back in a convoluted way with clairvoyants and death's design and collateral damage all the way back to Eve eating the apple

>>211664985 (OP)
Just like every horror franchise ever!

>>211664985 (OP)
I don't understand why the Bam Margera look alike died
>dude don't fuck with death

But what does that mean? I think he was supposed to die at the parlor but didn't and it skipped to the sister and then death came back for him, that's how it worked in the previous movies, just because you saved someone from death doesn't mean they're safe but it does skip to the next person

>>211664985 (OP)
They just made it into a series of Rube Goldberg machines that end with someone's head exploding at the end.

>>211665238
>it's kind of dumb how the real reason for all the other movies is this starting event of cheating death
Are you implying this movie connects to the other movies? I don't think it does, the other movies are all isolated accidents where there's very few survivors who end up dying anyway, unlike here where everyone in the tower survived and death took a while to get them all

>>211666623
mid bait

>>211666373
>made it into
you didn't watch the original movies

>>211666623
Yeah I have no idea why people keep making this mistake. Nothing in Bloodlines infers that all the other disasters were because of the Sky Deck. There's not connection to Flight 180 or the Rollercoaster of any of that... people seem to have just made that leap in their heads. Ironically in FD2 all the survivors realise they were in some way affiliated with the victims of Flight 180 and that their disaster was in fact connected, but no one ever questions the lore there.... even worse in FD5 we see disaster survivors become victims of Flight 180 despite one of them stealing the lifespan of another character (who just took the full life span of a different character) and the other is someone who wasn't actually killed in the opening disaster either.... it makes it a bit murky with the rules. Did Sam take Peter's extra years or were they null and void? Why was Death after Sam and Molly if Molly was never part of the design? Coincidentally just two clairvoyants on the same flight or did the visions pass from Sam to Alex?
What I think would have been good is if Peter and Molly were having an affair, so Peter's time was always up on Flight 180 when he was supposed to escape overseas. This would make Sam being there make sense at the end of the movie.

>>211666307
He wasn't supposed to die but then he came along and tried helping his brother cheat death so he was placed on the hitlist.