Thread 211704020 - /tv/ [Archived: 1292 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/20/2025, 12:46:24 AM No.211704020
IMG_20250619_154514
IMG_20250619_154514
md5: 726b76fc2c1355207813b10b384ddd77🔍
THE INTENTIONALLY BAD MOVIE IS.... LE BAD?
AHHHH SAVE ME I'M GOING INSAAAAANE
Replies: >>211704335 >>211704407 >>211705047 >>211705156 >>211705192 >>211705213 >>211707283
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 12:52:43 AM No.211704335
>>211704020 (OP)
it's intentionally epic
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 12:53:38 AM No.211704376
Yeah he was really mean and stupid in this one. I think that means it was one that Rob wrote most of it. That bit about pretending not to know who K Fed was is Rob all over.
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 12:54:09 AM No.211704407
>>211704020 (OP)
This review was just as good as the old days. He's still got it every now and then
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 12:57:18 AM No.211704548
ok, this is epic!
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 12:59:53 AM No.211704670
I can't believe cringe faggots like him used to run youtube
Replies: >>211704866 >>211706801
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:04:21 AM No.211704866
>>211704670
I can't believe it's possible not to believe that.
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:06:01 AM No.211704950
anyone who ever liked doug is retarded
even if you were 12, you're still retarded to this day
Replies: >>211704998
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:06:58 AM No.211704998
>>211704950
It's comfy for autismos
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:07:51 AM No.211705031
A BAT
CREDIT CARD?
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:08:14 AM No.211705047
>>211704020 (OP)
It's not supposed to be intentionally bad, retard. It's supposed to be funny, which it isn't unless you have the I.Q. of OP.
Replies: >>211705118 >>211705196 >>211707381
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:08:15 AM No.211705048
D0GYiiDX0AAPaA4
D0GYiiDX0AAPaA4
md5: a61a4b53637d78b57431f411085521f6🔍
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:09:34 AM No.211705118
>>211705047
you also just described everything doug has ever made
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:10:19 AM No.211705156
>>211704020 (OP)
>it was bad on purpose, which is good
Shut the fuck up.
Replies: >>211705254 >>211707276
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:11:05 AM No.211705192
1564692765241
1564692765241
md5: 26b1a0a730267571dddada61632327e9🔍
>>211704020 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPSaOgx6-6s
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:11:19 AM No.211705196
>>211705047
It grossed $86M against a $20M budget.
Get fucked.
Replies: >>211705426
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:11:47 AM No.211705213
>>211704020 (OP)
By that logic his own movie is above criticism.
Replies: >>211705266 >>211705316 >>211705364
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:12:32 AM No.211705254
>>211705156
Explain what you think "bad on purpose" means
Replies: >>211705878
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:12:48 AM No.211705266
>>211705213
>By that logic his own movie is above criticism.

Correct
Replies: >>211705364
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:13:33 AM No.211705316
>>211705213
He literally criticized all of the trilogy.
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:14:34 AM No.211705364
>>211705213
>>211705266
>by that logic
>no logic used just hallucinations
EST
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:15:54 AM No.211705426
>>211705196
normies got fooled! That means MOVIE GOOD! Do you think any movie that makes money is good? NGMI
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:24:24 AM No.211705878
>>211705254
The whole "bad on purpose" as a defense for its apparent poor quality is untenable when the work appears unironically substandard. You're implying deliberate crafting of a film to be flawed, often for ironic or comedic effect (AKA Plan 9). However, intentional shittiness requires clear, consistent signals (i.e. exaggerated performances, absurd dialogue, or overt technical incompetence) convey the filmmaker’s self-aware intent. Without these, the argument falls apart, as it assumes a level of creative control absent in genuinely poor execution.
Anyone who uses "bad on purpose" to justify a film’s flaws is likely misreading incompetence as irony, an intellectually lazy as fuck stance that avoids critical engagement with the work’s actual quality. Films with incoherent narratives, weak acting, or shoddy production are typically products of limited skill or resources, not calculated camp. To believe otherwise without evidence is, frankly, idiotic, as it dismisses the need for art to stand on its own merits. Audiences judge films based on tangible outcomes (story, visuals, emotional impact) not speculative intent. Thus, this "bad on purpose" faggotry is a hollow rationalization unless the film explicitly supports such a reading, and clinging to it reflects one's brown-skinned IQ.
Never fucking breed.
Replies: >>211706004 >>211706262
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:26:23 AM No.211706004
>>211705878
kek, now do "irony".
Replies: >>211706233
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:31:13 AM No.211706233
>>211706004
The real irony here is that you had the mental fortitude to respond, retard.
Replies: >>211706340
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:31:46 AM No.211706262
>>211705878
>Audiences judge films based on tangible outcomes (story, visuals, emotional impact) not speculative intent.
Basedbasedbased
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:33:41 AM No.211706340
>>211706233
lmao, for the hat trick "zero self-awareness"
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:41:57 AM No.211706801
>>211704670
Cringe faggots still run youtube
Replies: >>211707294
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:51:27 AM No.211707276
>>211705156
How would you describe Kickassia?
Replies: >>211707349 >>211707411
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:51:34 AM No.211707283
>>211704020 (OP)
This was one of his better videos. Maybe it's my sponsor block on YouTube, but I didn't see any stupid skits or hear any egregiously bad jokes
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:51:48 AM No.211707294
>>211706801
Fuck you buddy, content creators like Norg Zlorp Florp and Grizzy Fangle Quuuzzi are timeless masters of their craft!
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:53:01 AM No.211707349
>>211707276
A superhero crossover action adventure movie.
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:53:49 AM No.211707381
>>211705047
You're a retard.
Anonymous
6/20/2025, 1:54:20 AM No.211707411
>>211707276
How would a faggot who watches video essays and actually fucking believes them describe Kickassia?