IT BEGINS

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/james-gunn-superman-tracking-box-office-opening-1236295251/

>>211732418 (OP)
Errrrr snyder-saars? Our cope?

>>211732418 (OP)
>US alone
so potentially a $400 million global opening?

>>211732660
if you think $135 million is big for the summer tentpole capeshit than you're retarded. the drop-off is going to be huge

>>211732418 (OP)
>SUPERMAN tracking for $135 million opening
Sure it is.

>>211732686
750M run? idk how Jurassic World or Fantastic Four are doing, if this does more money Gunn will be in charge at least the next 5 years.

>>211732418 (OP)
I'll go see it.

>>211732418 (OP)
STOP SUCKING THE COCK OF THE 1978 FILM SO MUCH

>>211733431
Despicable and embarrassing on every level. Doubly so because the vast majority of the audience that is the target of this movie has not seen that film and will never see it. Man of Steel was its own film and enough time has gone by that by pure osmosis the young adult audience this movie needs to survive has latched on to Henry's Superman incarnation far too much for them to accept this whoever-the-fuck he is as Superman. Even worse is the complete plagiarizing of the Marvel Studios logo. How obnoxious. Also:
>A James Gunn Film
99 percent of the movie going audience has no idea who the fuck James Gunn is. Huge bomb incoming. Zazlav will roll heads like dominos.

>>211733381
$400 million globally would translate to a $800-$1b total. if the movie is good a billy should be mostly guaranteed.

guardians 3 only made 118m domestic opening and wound up with $845 total.

>>211732418 (OP)
Snyderbots on suicidewatch.

It opens 85 million domestically and a 145 million globally and limps to a meek 550 million haul.

>>211733514
That’s optimistic. It has 2 weeks until Fantastic 4 obliterates it.

>>211733575
Both will be obliterated by Jurassic World which will open lightly but have great legs due to no negative fandom baggage and oversaturation.

Yes yes goys, go eat your slop over and over again, like the good dogs you are

>>211732418 (OP)
>tracking
lol

>>211732418 (OP)
I understand thinking this looks like the worst Superman ever because it does.
I do NOT understand why Man of Steel is supposed to look good in comparison. Man of Steel is embarrassing to look at.

The reviews will kill Superman once the mixed reviews and rotten tomatoes come out its estimates will be lower. Plus two weeks ago it was tracking 145-165 million and went down already. Its not making a billion. It will do like cap 4 or Thunderbolts.

>>211733656
Gunnjeets have yet to refute this. The guerrilla marketing campaign for this movie is so blatant.

>>211733774
Also the range its tracking at is between 90-120 million, sandwiched between two other big movies. Seeing the obliteration for Mission Impossible despite the opening Supersaar will flop after a stupendous drop following opening weekend

>>211733659
The CGI at least wasn't lazy.