>You want compromise, how's this? Twenty years in Azkaban. I wanted pumpkin pasties, but I compromised. I ate shit flavored jelly beans from the commissary. I wanted to fuck a woman, but I compromised. I gave polyjuice potion Bernie in cell block B. You see where I'm going?

>>211741141 (OP)
how would he obtain a sample of a female's body to make the polyjuice potion?

>>211742558
Conjugal visits from Harry's ghost mom

>>211741141 (OP)
Bellatrix Lestrange was his cousin and in Azkaban at the same time as him.
Do you think she and Sirius ever... you know...

>>211742558
It's a ready made product you can buy at the commissary, like condoms or lube.

>>211741141 (OP)
Is it gay if you were forced to take polyjuice potion and turn into Hermione and get gangbanged by big Slytherin cocks? I think since you have a girl's body it would be ok if you came several times. It wouldn't even be your fault really if you got turned on by having their big thick cocks in your mouth and pussy since you had a girl's body so it wouldn't be that weird right?

>>211741141 (OP)
hey... what happens with poly juice, stays with poly juice...

>>211742904
Actually, no. The serious answer is no. Not that it would matter. But you'd have to settle that shit quick because it's a temporary potion.

When it comes to quality, compromise is the order of the day for the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>how about I take that self playing harp and ram it up your box

>He never had the makings of a Quidditch Cup athlete.

>>211742904
>Is it gay
the answer is yes. that's a gay use of the potion.

>That's right mudbloods, go back to Diagon Alley! Take those pieces of shit and get off my lake.

>>211743059
Heh