>>211743457I'm saying the concept is flawed because it suggest you need to adhere to strict rules about structure and formulating a story. "You must use a three-act structure, there must be a conflict, there must be a climax, everything must be explained, etc." There are many possibilities to explore if you don't shackle yourself to arbitrary and meaningless rules. The Ghibli movies (and Japanese entertainment having aspects like a 4-act structure, higher importance on characters than precise storytelling, etc) are examples of things that exist without these concepts. Yes you can say 'weeb' or whatever but it's what I know and I'm sure there are other structures and ideas from other places.
The truth is every word in every language is impossible to be clearly defined, and this is an actual concept in psychology that is discussed and studied (categorization, etc). Again I can only speak from what I know, so sorry if the "weeb" reference is not popular, but Japanese doesn't have this notion of "what is art" because they don't have exactly the same type of word. Likewise they don't really have different words for sex and gender.
Language is a limiting concept that keeps you from understanding greater ideas because it is inherently flawed and limited.
Which is why almost every single trite/cliche saying and proverb is stupid and pointless, and why anytime someone talks like "it's called..." I immediately dismiss them as unintelligent.
The tl;dr spark notes to understanding and intelligence is simple: just treat literally everything as a case-by-base basis. The moment you try to set rules, it breaks.